On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Francois-Rene Rideau wrote:
>
> I've reviewed this in the context of httpd-2.1, and it looks good to me
> with essentially the same patch. It works on your testcase, and I'm
> 99% satisfied that it doesn't break anything. Ready to com
Hi,
I notice that the last release of the "flood" utility was in 2002. I had to make some
trivial changes to get it to compile with my installation of apache 2.0.49 (include
apr_poll.h, add an argument to the call to apr_poll).
Now, it compiles but segfaults immediately, even with the example
s
Nick Kew wrote:
(2) Bug #29554 - URL munging
I've ported Francois-Rene Rideau's patch to 2.1, subject to the
question over proxy_fixup discussed in my last post.
Looking at this issue, I think the real solution is to
a) canonicalise all URLS (reverse and forward) for internal Apache use.
b) use the
Nick Kew wrote:
Can anyone see why proxy_fixup should not be removed altogether?
Proxy fixup seems to do the job of making sure the URL "/%41%42%43"
matches "ProxyPass /ABC http://xxx/ABC";, so I don't think it should be
removed altogether.
The URL that is sent to the backend server however has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#if APR_HAS_SHARED_MEMORY
+/* If the cache file already exists then delete it. Otherwise we are
+ * going to run into problems creating the shared memory. */
+apr_file_remove(st->cache_file, ptemp);
+if (st->cache_file) {
+
No, I didn't change anything that would allow for anonymous shared
memory. This should probably check for a NULL before calling
apr_file_remove().
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROTECT
Brad Nicholes wrote:
No, I didn't change anything that would allow for anonymous shared
memory. This should probably check for a NULL before calling
apr_file_remove().
+apr_file_remove(st->cache_file, ptemp);
Will this line segfault if ptempt is NULL? If not, then it should be
fine. I
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > Can anyone see why proxy_fixup should not be removed altogether?
>
> Proxy fixup seems to do the job of making sure the URL "/%41%42%43"
> matches "ProxyPass /ABC http://xxx/ABC";, so I don't think it should be
> removed altogether
ptemp shouldn't ever be NULL on a post_config, right? I just fixed
the code so that it checks for a NULL file name before calling
apr_file_remove().
Brad
Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
>>> [EMAIL PROT
This patch should fix the shared memory issues on Linux and Solaris.
But this code could use some more review and testing. I would like to
get mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap out of experimental if this proves to
stabilize the module. On a related issue, I would also like to backport
these patches
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Nick Kew wrote:
> OK, that's what I needed to know. I'll still have to modify my patch
> slightly to work with yours, but at least it's now clear what's going on.
DO make sure that it is still possible for, say, mod_perl or mod_jk to
remove/kill a coppy with an expired Set
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > Can anyone see why proxy_fixup should not be removed altogether?
>
> Proxy fixup seems to do the job of making sure the URL "/%41%42%43"
> matches "ProxyPass /ABC http://xxx/ABC";, so I don't think it should be
> removed altogether
12 matches
Mail list logo
