Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/t/protocol nntp-like.t

2004-09-29 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:53:42AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jerenkrantz2004/09/28 23:53:42 Modified:perl-framework/c-modules/nntp_like mod_nntp_like.c perl-framework/t/apache contentlength.t perl-framework/t/protocol nntp-like.t Log: Fix

Re: cvs commit: httpd-test/perl-framework/c-modules/test_pass_brigade mod_test_pass_brigade.c

2004-09-29 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:19:24PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: jorton 2004/09/29 08:03:59 Modified:perl-framework/c-modules/test_pass_brigade mod_test_pass_brigade.c Log: Prevent death by memory

Re: segfault patch for util_ldap (was:Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS)

2004-09-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:59 PM 9/28/2004, you wrote: On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:00:12 -0600, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting the download page: Official Patches When we have patches to a minor bug or two, or features which we haven't yet included in a new release, we will put them in the patches

Re: [PATCH 21492 30278 30419 31385] Several bugs in mod_cache / mod_disk_cache

2004-09-29 Thread Rüdiger Plüm
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 Rüdiger Plüm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..cut..] Many thanks for the quick response. As I was curious I had a look to the cvs. Sorry for the maybe stupid question. Do I understand this correctly: You commit the changes to the

Re: [PATCH 21492 30278 30419 31385] Several bugs in mod_cache / mod_disk_cache

2004-09-29 Thread Bill Stoddard
Rüdiger Plüm wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 Rüdiger Plüm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [..cut..] Many thanks for the quick response. As I was curious I had a look to the cvs. Sorry for the maybe stupid question. Do I understand this correctly: You

Re: Proposal to create testers@httpd

2004-09-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 28, 2004, at 4:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I have an ongoing fight with the amount of spam at the two testers lists, and because there is not a useful distinction, I'm thinking that for those who want to participate, one list is sufficient. +1 Would anyone object to merging the

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Sep 29 23:45:05 EDT 2004

2004-09-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/22 13:01:17 $] Release: 1.3.32-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release top of Sept. 1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004. 1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Sep 29 23:45:13 EDT 2004

2004-09-29 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/03 02:47:19 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related