Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread André Malo
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. > I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, > etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page > for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Garrett Rooney
André Malo wrote: * Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to

Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2004/11/14]

2004-11-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Apache httpd-2.0 [2004/11/14]

2004-11-14 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: [users@httpd] apache-1.3.33: mod_log_forensic module use of assert() vs. ap_assert() introduces __eprintf() gcc-ism? (fwd)

2004-11-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Forwarded message: > > On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 17:23:34 -0800, Wilson Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > apache-1.3.33: mod_log_forensic module use of assert() vs. ap_assert() > > introduces __eprintf() gcc-ism? > > Thanks for the detailed diagnosis. There may not be people on the > users list q

[PATCH] 1.3.34-dev mod_log_forensic.c to use ap_assert

2004-11-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Anyone have any comments on the below? Index: src/modules/standard/mod_log_forensic.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/modules/standard/mod_log_forensic.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 mod_log_forensic.c --- src/modul

Re: [PATCH] 1.3.34-dev mod_log_forensic.c to use ap_assert

2004-11-14 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:47:32 -0500, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any comments on the below? +1

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:39 AM +0100 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In case that nobody has already thought about it: Does it sound like a good idea, to use svn:externals to retrieve the proper apr(-util) versions? I talked that over with Ben Collins-Sussman on #apachecon yesterday

[PATCH 13453] Bug 24331: SSLPassPhraseDialog exec: always default port in argv

2004-11-14 Thread Leif W
Summary: SSLPassPhraseDialog exec: always default port in argv BUG 24331 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24331 PATCH 13453 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=13453 The bug still exists in 2.0.52. I first noticed this bug in 2.0.49, tested with 2.0.4

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Geoffrey Young
Sander Striker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. > I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, > etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page > for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the > source

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Let's not forget the 1.3 docs, unless we can somehow combine the 2. When you checkout/export apache-1.3, a subset of htdocs in httpd-docs-1.3 comes along for the ride -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] h

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the s

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: > It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to > subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by at the Hackathon and w

[PATCH 13429] Bug 7862: suexec never log a group name.

2004-11-14 Thread Leif W
Summary: SSLPassPhraseDialog exec: always default port in argv BUG 7862 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7862 PATCH 13429 http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=13429 The bug still exists in 2.0.52. I first noticed this bug in 2.0.52, but the original re

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by at

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Geoffrey Young
> It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to > subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into > modperl-2.0 check out. As long as this is all done at once there should > be no problem. None of these projects had any branching so it shouldn't > be a pr

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into modperl-2.0 check out. As long as this is all done at once there should be no problem. None of these projects had any branching so it should

2.2 roadmap meeting tomorrow

2004-11-14 Thread Cliff Woolley
For any committers interested: we're going to do a lunch meeting tomorrow (Monday) over lunch. Place TBA. I propose Hamburger Mary's since it's close and I haven't been there yet this year. --Cliff