Re: svn commit: r111892 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_dumpio.html /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_dumpio.html.en /

2004-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > adjust properties: > - svn:eol-style = native > - svn:keywords = LastChangedRevision for mod_dumpio.xml > Are these documented somewhere? Not what they mean, but what our standards are as far as these are concerned, etc...? I hate looking like an idiot :) -- ===

Re: svn commit: r111895 - in httpd/httpd/trunk: modules/cache modules/debug modules/experimental support

2004-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Author: nd > Date: Tue Dec 14 15:01:47 2004 > New Revision: 111895 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=111895 > Log: > svn:eol-style = native > Thanks!! -- === Jim Jagielsk

Re: WebDAV and reading / writing files as system users

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Yes. I don't know of anyone successfully using perchild. There is another > group working on a successor called something like mpmmux, but they've > been rather quite too. metuxmpm has been reported to be running successfully in production enviro

Re: WebDAV and reading / writing files as system users

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if this proper filesharing concept is to work properly, then at some > point the DAV server will have to support some kind of interaction with > the filesystem along far better lines than the current "one user owns all". Another point: why not

Re: WebDAV and reading / writing files as system users

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you mount the DAV filesystem on the local box, so that all access > would go through DAV? That way all access would go through Apache and > it could have its own sandbox. a) are there *working* DAV filesystem drivers for several OS'es b) perfo

Re: svn commit: r111837 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: debug test

2004-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Paul Querna wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/.deps > > >httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/Makefile > > > > I thought these should both be generated, not checked into svn? > > > > Yep, but how does one tell SVN to i

Re: Towards a generic database connection API

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Aehm, what kind of database access are we talking about ? Full SQL quering or just something like sendmail's map-API ? If we really need full SQL, I would suggest something like unixodbc or perl DBI. But I'm not in favour of reinventing the wheel and having yet another SQL framework which redu

Re: WebDAV and reading / writing files as system users

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I am busy researching the idea of an Apache + DAV server that would do > the job of what a typical Samba server does now - file sharing. An > Apache server would have the advantage of native SSL support, flexible > authentication configuration,

Re: svn commit: r111837 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: debug test

2004-12-14 Thread Garrett Rooney
Jim Jagielski wrote: Paul Querna wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/.deps httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/Makefile I thought these should both be generated, not checked into svn? Yep, but how does one tell SVN to ignore them?? :/ svn pedit svn:ignore modules/debug

Re: mod_actions 1.32 patch never made it to 2.0

2004-12-14 Thread André Malo
* Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:13:23 +0100, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I have a couple of pretty big issues with this response. > > > > > > 1) You have a configuration in Apache 1.3 that doesn't wo

Re: Why bundling 3rd-party packages anyway ? [WAS: A zLib Update....?]

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > * André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Enrico Weigelt wrote: > > > > Why is pcre bundled anyway ? Other packages (ie zlib or expat) are > > > > also not bundled, so why pcre ? > > > > > > vendor branch. > > > > how do

Re: svn commit: r111837 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: debug test

2004-12-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Paul Querna wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/.deps > >httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/Makefile > > I thought these should both be generated, not checked into svn? > Yep, but how does one tell SVN to ignore them?? :/ -- =

Re: 2.1.2-alpha http/ftp proxy/cache problems

2004-12-14 Thread Andreas Steinmetz
Mladen Turk wrote: Since the fix is trivial, I'll commit the changes ASAP. Will you be able to retest upon the commit? No problem, if you let me know the svn id(s), as I currently don't have svn installed and thus will need to extract the changes through the web interface.

Re: yet another autoconf torture

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is possible to support cross compilation with autoconf-based build > systems. configure supports this by use of cache variables; standard > practice is to build up a "config.site" file with the correct test > results for the target (e.g. "ac_cv_func_se

Re: autoshit addiction [WAS: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem]

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this mean the following macro should appear somewhere in > httpd's configury? > > -- Macro: AC_PROG_EGREP > Check whether `$GREP -E' works, or else search the user's `PATH' > for `egrep', and `gegrep', in that order, and set output v

Re: svn commit: r111837 - in httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: debug test

2004-12-14 Thread Paul Querna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/.deps httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/debug/Makefile I thought these should both be generated, not checked into svn? -Paul

Re: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem

2004-12-14 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that was fixed in 1.5.10. For an autoconf 2.59-generated > configure script the only reference to "grep -E" is in the test to see > whether grep -E works or not, so that looks fixed to me too. well, i've tried to regenerate configure with the newest

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl)

2004-12-14 Thread TAYLOR, TIM \(CONTRACTOR\)
Thanks for the explanation, Joe. Here is the modified patch. Should I open a bug report and/or create doc? Whatever will facilitate incorporation into the soonest possible release, please advise. regards, tt -Original Message- From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, Dec

Re: Proposal: sections

2004-12-14 Thread Rich Bowen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For some reason I bounced enough email to get booted off of the list. Bah. Anyways, I was looking at Rici's proposal, and I think I really like it. It seems more to match the way that people think about vhosts, and it seems to be in the spirit of what t

Re: Hackathon during Q1 2005?

2004-12-14 Thread Ben Laurie
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 06:19 AM 12/11/2004, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: During ApacheCon, a number of us had talked about holding more frequent face-to-face meetings (or summits or whatever). Fred is willing to find a place for us at Apple w

Re: Hackathon during Q1 2005?

2004-12-14 Thread Ben Laurie
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: Sounds a lot more feasible than travelling to .us for a hack. But I'm wondering what this actually achieves? Sure, it gets people to focus on Getting Things Done, but a *scheduled* IRC+pastebin-based hackathon could do that

Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.1.2 tagged...

2004-12-14 Thread Brad Nicholes
+1, lets get something out there for the community to test. If we have to go through a bunch of 2.1.x-betas before we feel comfortable with branching, so be it. Brad >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, December 13, 2004 4:30:29 PM >>> --On Monday, December 13, 2004 2:40 PM -0700 Paul Querna <[EMAIL P

Re: svn commit: r111830 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_ajp.c /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_http

2004-12-14 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ap_rputs(apr_strfsize(worker->s->transfered, fbuf), r); > "WrNumber of bytes transfered\n" Furthermore, it's "transferred". --Cliff

Re: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem

2004-12-14 Thread Glenn Strauss
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:58:42AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I would like to see ALOT of feedback to current-testers or dev > or even apache-modules of the alpha before declaring first beta. > Once beta - we should be very adverse to API changes - our module > authors will want to fix on

Re: mod_actions 1.32 patch never made it to 2.0

2004-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
André Malo wrote: * Cliff Woolley wrote: So why is this same general behavior unconditional in httpd 1.3 but non-existant in 2.0 and requires a "virtual" flag on 2.1? Andre? Thoughts? The "virtual" thing was your doing... see STATUS file. It's already voted for backport, just didn't make it yet

Re: mod_actions 1.32 patch never made it to 2.0

2004-12-14 Thread André Malo
* Cliff Woolley wrote: > So why is this same general behavior unconditional in httpd 1.3 but > non-existant in 2.0 and requires a "virtual" flag on 2.1? Andre? > Thoughts? The "virtual" thing was your doing... see STATUS file. It's already voted for backport, just didn't make it yet... The rea

Re: autoshit addiction [WAS: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem]

2004-12-14 Thread Patrick Welche
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:33:26AM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > It is of these macros which are doing regex test. My build system runs > the GNU grep v. 2.4.1. A short look the grep --help exposes, that the > -E option has to be passed when using extendet regex. Simply calling > egrep does not

Re: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem

2004-12-14 Thread Andrew Stribblehill
Quoting Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2004-12-14 04:50:36 GMT): > * Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is part of the problem automake avoidance? AFAIR httpd just uses > No, autoconf is bad enough, automake will make it even worse. > > Dont expect apache to remain in so many

Re: [PATCH] fixing broken gnu ld (mis)detection problem

2004-12-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 03:20:26AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Of course we could do that. > > However, it's entirely against the first principal of httpd, > which is that this project builds against more old and crufty > operating systems installs than most utilities, sans 'cat' :) > >

Re: 2.1.2-alpha http/ftp proxy/cache problems

2004-12-14 Thread Mladen Turk
Andreas Steinmetz wrote: Both problems described below relate to the http and the ftp proxy with cache enabled. URLs and proxy setup are given at the end of this mail. Hi, As Justin said it has nothing to do with the cache. The problem is with the single forward/reverse proxy worker that is not t