Re: SSL error trapping

2005-05-10 Thread sternmarc
The command apr_table_setn(r-notes, "ssl-access-forbidden", "1");is incorrect, as we don't have access to the request (request_rec struct). I suppose we could find it, but do we really need this line ? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org

Re: [PATCH] SSL patch for ab (ApacheBench)

2005-05-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:13:47PM +0900, Masaoki Kobayashi wrote: This patch modifies the support/ab.c to handle SSL/TLS properly. This looks really wonderful, thanks a lot for submitting this. Is there any chance that you can rediff this against the version of ab on the trunk?

Re: Single-threaded/non-blocking frontend and multi-threaded/processed backend

2005-05-10 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 4/13/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, I originally posted this feature request to the bug tracker, but Joe Orton suggested it'd post it here instead, so here it is. I'd like to see a new 'MPM' that basically works like this: A single or

Re: [PATCH] SSL patch for ab (ApacheBench)

2005-05-10 Thread Masaoki Kobayashi
OK. It seems not so hard to apply those changes to the one on trunk. I will make the patch in a few days. When I give SSL stress to apache httpd 2.0.54 with the new ab, the SSL connections at the httpd will be unstable. I believe there should be a problem around the SSL session cache as dbm.

Re: Single-threaded/non-blocking frontend and multi-threaded/processed backend

2005-05-10 Thread Phillip Susi
Why have a separate 'frontend' and 'backend'? One of these days when I get some spare time, I plan on rewriting mpm_winnt to use a small pool of threads which will use unbuffered zero copy overlapped IO and an IO completion port as the notification mechanism. The pool of worker threads will

Re: Single-threaded/non-blocking frontend and multi-threaded/processed backend

2005-05-10 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On 5/10/05, Phillip Susi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why have a separate 'frontend' and 'backend'? Because for example PHP is not thread-safe and PHP may (easily) crash (and you don't wish to allow that to crash the entire server). Or because you wish to run one backend as user A and another

RE: need a custom verify_resp function

2005-05-10 Thread Sergey Ten
Hello all, I have a change which implements a generic function comparing returned code against specified as an attribute of the url. The diff is enclosed. Is there a document how to check-in into the flood source tree? Best regards, Sergey Ten, SourceLabs Dependable Open Source Systems Index:

ap_save_brigade = apr_save_brigade?

2005-05-10 Thread Stas Bekman
Hi, what's the status of ap_save_brigade()? why it is not in the libapr? Thanks. -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL

Re: setup.py.in fixes

2005-05-10 Thread Jim Gallacher
The patch submitted last night had a typo (missing comma) in it. The corrected version is attached. Jim Jim Gallacher wrote: I found a couple of errors in dist/setup.py.in. The attached patch should fix the problems. Changes: 1. The regular expression used by the getconfigure_option function

Re: svn commit: r169535 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/modules/standard/mod_log_forensic.c

2005-05-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:36 PM 5/10/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Win32-enable, unix threaded-enable the mod_log_forensic module. * adds a get_forensic_id() function, differing between win32, threaded, and non-threaded platforms (threaded and win32 platforms get instead an pid:tid:time:seq

TRACE considered harmfull (B***S$$$)

2005-05-10 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Well, reviewing Nessus reports this week has left me *very* pissed off. Has anyone assembled a list of all of the various client browser identifiers that are too moronic to handle a TRACE request properly? It seems the rational thing to do is trip those browsers which can't handle a simple

Re: TRACE considered harmfull (B***S$$$)

2005-05-10 Thread Paul Querna
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Well, reviewing Nessus reports this week has left me *very* pissed off. Has anyone assembled a list of all of the various client browser identifiers that are too moronic to handle a TRACE request properly? No, I just ignore these silly Nessus reports. Every

Re: svn commit: r169535 - /httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/src/modules/standard/mod_log_forensic.c

2005-05-10 Thread André Malo
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Thanks for catching that, but... I'm very interested for someone(s) to verify that . it works on netware? . builds and the old tid:time:pid format is good still on unix. What happend to the good ol' RTC? nd -- Wenn nur Ingenieure mit Diplom programmieren