Le Mardi 2 Août 2005 22:39, Jess Holle a écrit :
I suggest you to disable shm. There is some problems into apr around shm &
mmap. Because apache use prefork you can have some serious problem with
global lock (for example when a signal is sent). There is two ways for apache
folks to fix this pro
Hi, all,
I'm new in this area. Could anyone please tell me how to start? I
want to use Apache XML security library (c version) with httpd to
filter XML traffic.
Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Zhenxiao Liu
That's what it was, thanks. Say, the name says 'Sendfile' but that
doesn't exist on win32. Does apache call TransmitFile() instead or does
it use some very poor library emulation of sendfile()? If it were using
TransmitFile() I would expect it to not have any trouble saturating the
network.
Try setting
EnableSendfile off
in your apache config file and rerunning the tests. There have been
other reports of surprisingly slow transfer speeds with sendfile
enabled on Windows. This won't affect SSL, of course, since the SSL
transfer cannot use sendfile.
On 2-Aug-05, at 3:51 PM, Phi
Phillip Susi wrote:
I decided to do some informal benchmark comparisons between using
windows SMBFS and apache/webdav for file transfers. I ended up finding
that apache is actually faster at sending files over an SSL connection
than a plain connection. I downloaded a ~600 meg test file from th
I decided to do some informal benchmark comparisons between using
windows SMBFS and apache/webdav for file transfers. I ended up finding
that apache is actually faster at sending files over an SSL connection
than a plain connection. I downloaded a ~600 meg test file from the
server using windows
Title: Message
I suspect (somewhat strongly) that this issue is in util_ldap, not in
APR, but Josh's question is a good one -- is this a known util_ldap
issue?
We had for some time disabled shared memory in util_ldap by pretending
it did not exist on any platform by replacing shared-memory ifd
Title: Message
Has anyone seen any
problems in apr_rmm.c on systems with shared memory and ldap
enabled?
When I stop Apache
via Crtl-C, I'm getting the Windows error saying that something is a miss in
Apache. Stepping into the debugger, reveals that the problem is at line
373 of srclib\apr
>>> "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tuesday, August 02,
2005 1:12:58 PM >>>
>Voting on dev@ is equivilant to voting in STATUS.
True, but it makes it easier to track.
Brad
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
[...]
My first thought is upgraded to 2.06-dev ASAP as _lots_ of bugs have
been fixed. Then it dawns on me that 2.04 is before the API rename so
we really shouldn't be supporting it. what versions of httpd and mp2
are you using ?
I shall check this out later.
Cra
Voting on dev@ is equivilant to voting in STATUS.
There is an open Veto on the current 2.0.55 - would appreciate some
reviewers. I'll back out the improper patch tonight to make it easier,
if that partial correction was part of the reason this isn't getting
any attention. Perhaps a full backport
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:15:51PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> -because its doesn't depend on a corresponding module="mod_proxy"
> +because it doesn't depend on a corresponding module="mod_proxy"
Thanks, committed.
Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens
Fon: +49-
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:03:45PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> > The problem with the OID() "function" is that it where file() (or
> > another file() like function) return a single value, what OID()
> > stands for is an "array of zero
I'm not seeing the votes in the STATUS file. If we are +1 to the patch
then lets get the votes recorded and get the patch backported.
Do I smell a 2.0.55?
Brad
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 02, 2005 7:21:41 AM >>>
+1 to this fix.
Folks, either agree the code is correct, disagree that i
Jeffrey Horner wrote:
Hello allo,
I'd like to point you to my project, mod_R: The R/Apache Integration
Project which depends on libapreq2:
http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/bin/view/Main/ApacheRproject
With the mod_R 0.1.0 distribution, which is licensed under Apache 2.0,
I've bundled
At 08:21 AM 8/2/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>+1 to this fix.
>
>Folks, either agree the code is correct, disagree that it should
>be some other way, identify it's bugs, or hush up. Plenty of
>people ARE using 2.2 ldap auth today - and there is no reason
>to stand in the way of committing ob
William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
> +1 to this fix.
>
> Folks, either agree the code is correct, disagree that it should
> be some other way, identify it's bugs, or hush up. Plenty of
> people ARE using 2.2 ldap auth today - and there is no reason
> to stand in the way of committing obvious bug fixes, e
Hello!.
I wonder what is the estimated release date for 2.0.55?
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mandriva: http://www.mandriva.com
NUX: http://nux.se
+1 to this fix.
Folks, either agree the code is correct, disagree that it should
be some other way, identify it's bugs, or hush up. Plenty of
people ARE using 2.2 ldap auth today - and there is no reason
to stand in the way of committing obvious bug fixes, especially
for recently modified code t
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:23:44PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:00:24PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> 1) this is a pretty specific to way to code it. Is there no way to make
> >> it more general so that OID() is just a function like file() and can be
> >> used e.g. in r
Greg Ames wrote:
Brian Pane wrote:
I'm eager to hear some feedback on this idea:
* Will it work? Or am I overlooking some design flaw?
it should work as long as everything important that happens after the
check_pipeline_flush call still gets done somehow. a quick glance at
the code shows
At 12:52 PM 7/25/2005, André Malo wrote:
>* Akins, Brian wrote:
>
>> [Mon Jul 25 13:15:28 2005] [error] [client 85.140.27.54]
>> url_cache_handler: may serve STALE content: 0: /toon/tools/img/jewel.jpg,
>> referer:
>> http://schedule.cartoonnetwork.com/servlet/ScheduleServlet?action=show&sh
>>owI D
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 12:00:24PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:24:50PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> > Joe Orton wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:11:56PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> > >
> > >>Author: martin
> > >>Date: Fri Jul 22 05:11:55 2005
> > >>New Revision:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:24:50PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:11:56PM -, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> >
> >>Author: martin
> >>Date: Fri Jul 22 05:11:55 2005
> >>New Revision: 220307
> >>
> >>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=220307&view=rev
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
