On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> So, we need to either add a ap_sub_req_lookup_uri() equivalent that does
> not lookup the quickhandler, or move mod_dir to being both a fixup and a
> content handler and having it make an actual sub request.
I've gone with the fo
Here are two modules I worked on last week while on a trip and ready
for some discussion.
mod_smtpd_auth
mod_smtpd_auth_dbd
http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/
mod_smtpd.patch will be needed which adds the auth hooks and info into
the smtp rec. This patch also does a dns look up of t
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On September 24, 2005 9:58:26 AM -0700 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Actually, we are getting to the point were I would rather just have a
> >hard depends on APR >= 1.2.0
>
> How about emitting a warning at co
Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:09:46PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
For testing in http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ to release;
+1 -1 for release:
[ ] [ ] apr-1.2.2
[ ] [ ] apr-util-1.2.2
Thanks form RMing; +1 for both, test suite passes on all-the-Linuxes
here.
Please test
Hi,
It's been one month that my SoC project is now over. I even received
the money from Google. Thanks again to all of you for your help and
support during the summer.
For now, I would really like to see something moving around
mod_mbox. I did not get any news from the httpd-mbox-search guy, nor
Joe Orton said:
> I think it would actually be sensible at this point to require
> apr/apr-util >= 1.2.0 across the board.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Joe Orton said:
>
> > I think it would actually be sensible at this point to require
> > apr/apr-util >= 1.2.0 across the board.
>
> +1.
+1
I might be adding >= 1.3.0 dependencies to trunk soon too, in the form
of configurable b
On 9/27/05, Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > --On September 24, 2005 9:58:26 AM -0700 Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Actually, we are getting to the point were I would rather just have a
> > >hard depe
On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:33 -0500, Brian J. France wrote:
> Here are two modules I worked on last week while on a trip and ready
> for some discussion.
>
> mod_smtpd_auth
> mod_smtpd_auth_dbd
>
> http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/
>
> mod_smtpd.patch will be needed which adds the auth
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:15:43PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Available at:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> And:
> http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.1.8/
>
> The 2.1.8 tarball bundles a copy APR 1.2.1 and APR-Util 1.2.1.
Thanks for RMing. +1 for beta, httpd-tested on all-t
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 05:15:43PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> Please report on testing experiences and (if applicable) vote on
> releasing httpd 2.1.8-BETA.
+1, tested on Ubuntu and Debian, with 3 days of usage on ftp.heanet.ie.
--
Colm MacCárthaighPublic Key: [EMAIL
Paul Querna wrote:
The 2.1.8 tarball bundles a copy APR 1.2.1 and APR-Util 1.2.1.
I'm afraid -1 on beta (+1 to alpha), until I can roll a binary with apr
and apr-util 1.2.2 (the first to run again on Windows).
I thought apr was semi-decoupled, meaning we would include a minimum
recommended ap
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:16:18AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >The 2.1.8 tarball no longer includes the XML Files for generating the
> >documentation. Only the generated HTML Files are packaged.
>
> -1 - this doesn't help folks contribute patches to docs.
We were already removing the
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:16:18AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The 2.1.8 tarball no longer includes the XML Files for generating the
documentation. Only the generated HTML Files are packaged.
-1 - this doesn't help folks contribute patches to docs.
We were alr
NetWare has one issue that will require apr-1.2.2. The problem is in
filepath.c while validating that the path is not above root (trunk rev.
240085). At this point it is only affecting one of the SSI commands and
I don't consider it a showstopper for 2.1.8-beta. But moving to
apr-1.2.2 would b
[added [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
> > The 2.1.8 tarball no longer includes the XML Files for generating the
> > documentation. Only the generated HTML Files are packaged.
>
> -1 - this doesn't help folks contribute patches to docs.
Actually, nobody ever
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The 2.1.8 tarball bundles a copy APR 1.2.1 and APR-Util 1.2.1.
I'm afraid -1 on beta (+1 to alpha), until I can roll a binary with apr
and apr-util 1.2.2 (the first to run again on Windows).
I thought apr was semi-decoupled, meaning we would inc
[ moving this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For those not on
the Subversion lists, Subversion has an issue with escaping the contents of
the httpd log. ]
--On September 27, 2005 7:17:59 PM +0200 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only \xx is used. Well, c2x is utilized, but t
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> [ moving this from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For those not
> on the Subversion lists, Subversion has an issue with escaping the
> contents of the httpd log. ]
>
> --On September 27, 2005 7:17:59 PM +0200 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Only \xx i
19 matches
Mail list logo
