On Dec 8, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Even with an EOS bucket, how will we indicate that the connection
should be
aborted? (i.e. don't try to do any further writes?)
The inbound connection hasn't been aborted -- only the outbound.
We don't even want to abort the inbound connec
* Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I've never seen that syntax before either.
>
> That's C99 syntax. Older compilers, and C++ compilers, don't
> generally support it.
Then we should throw it away. We are supposed to
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:38:53PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:16:42PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
> >>Setting the inbound c->aborted within a filter just to indicate
> >>that the outbound connection has died is w
On Dec 8, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:16:42PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
Setting the inbound c->aborted within a filter just to indicate
that the outbound connection has died is wrong -- it prevents
other parts of the server (that are working fine) from
Nick Kew wrote:
I really don't like the idea of having to install ant just to build apache.
It's a major new dependency, yet adds nothing to the server.
We have too many dependencies, at least this -one- would be ASF software.
I wholeheartedly support the concept, but don't believe this is act
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:12, Phil Endecott wrote:
> [AP_INIT incompatible with C++ in 2.2]
Joe had a suggestion about that, but noone followed up on it.
IMO it would be worth fixing if someone had a round tuit, but
I don't see it as a priority job.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
On 12/8/05, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, I've never seen that syntax before either.
That's C99 syntax. Older compilers, and C++ compilers, don't
generally support it.
-garrett
Phil Endecott wrote:
> # define AP_INIT_TAKE1(directive, func, mconfig, where, help) \
> { directive, { .take1=func }, mconfig, where, TAKE1, help }
>
> That "{.take1=func}" syntax was a new one on me. A quick test suggests
> that it is legal in C but not in C++, and I compile my module with
On 12/08/2005 11:20 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 12/8/05, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..cut..]
>
> It's not just the "outer rim", most BSD systems don't have Java
> installed, and I'd hardly consider them fringe platforms.
Sorry for this. I never intended to put BSD systems t
mod_python.publisher iterables and content_type broken
--
Key: MODPYTHON-97
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-97
Project: mod_python
Type: Bug
Components: publisher
Versions: 3.2
Re
On 12/8/05, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Furthermore you need a platform with a recent JDK. Of course our main
> platforms should provide
> this, but I think many of the platforms on the outer rim do not have this.
> Converting the build system to Ant would cancel support for those
On 12/08/2005 06:57 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2005 17:07, Francis ANDRE wrote:
>
[..cut..]
>
> I really don't like the idea of having to install ant just to build apache.
> It's a major new dependency, yet adds nothing to the server.
Also my opinion. Ant is a great tool f
On 12/08/2005 11:59 AM, Matthias Behrens wrote:
[..cut..]
> thats a pretty good feature but something that would really kick ass would
> be if the proxy would know the cpu-load of every balanceserver
>
> is it possible you could hand the cpuload throu an extra header and restore
> it to zere i
Dear All,
I'm the author of Anyterm (http://anyterm.org), which includes an Apache
module. Although I haven't yet tried to compile it for Apache 2.2 some
of my users have, and they're having problems. See
http://anyterm.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=768#p768. It looks as if
the definition o
i'd like to take a look at it. mod_authn_dbd does not seem to be part of
2.2.0 win32
where can i get the win32 sources?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 16:09
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_auth_oracle
On
On Thursday 08 December 2005 17:07, Francis ANDRE wrote:
> IMHO, ant should not be used to generate the configure and makefile
> scripts; Instead the building process must avoid all these specific Unix
> tools like autoconf/configure. As a example of a great usage of ant for
> building a product, h
Francis ANDRE wrote:
> IMHO, ant should not be used to generate the configure and makefile
> scripts;
> Instead the building process must avoid all these specific Unix tools
> like autoconf/configure. As a example of a great usage of ant for
> building a
> product, have a look to the directory in t
IMHO, ant should not be used to generate the configure and makefile scripts;
Instead the building process must avoid all these specific Unix tools
like autoconf/configure. As a example of a great usage of ant for building a
product, have a look to the directory in the Apache axis project :
ws-axi
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am using Apache 2.0.54 on RHEL3u5 with no problems. It's working as a
reverse-proxy with mod_disk_cache.
I did have problems with RHEL3u5's Apache2 package, though. Caching did
not work
(and yes, DSOs were loaded), so I had to install from sources. I can't
remember
On Dec 8, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Brian Akins wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
At this point the frontend connection has already sent a 200 Ok,
it's already sent headers like Content-Length, etc, at this point
there is no graceful way of handling the error or sending "bad
gateway".
I agree. The
On Thursday 08 December 2005 13:13, Nick Kew wrote:
> This is part of the Apache DBD framework, which should supersede
> earlier modules relying on SQL backends of any kind.
To which I should have added a pointer to the relevant manpages
for using it for authentication.
http://httpd.apache.org/d
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:16:42PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
> Setting the inbound c->aborted within a filter just to indicate
> that the outbound connection has died is wrong -- it prevents
> other parts of the server (that are working fine) from correctly
> handling the bad gateway response.
FW
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> uname -a
> Linux ex07 2.4.21-37.EL #1 Wed Sep 7 13:35:21 EDT 2005 i686 i686
> i386 GNU/Linux
Is that RH3? I have had no issues with worker and rh3
What does error log say? And what is threadsperchild set to? It may
be a stack size thing.
--
Brian Akins
Lead
Francis ANDRE wrote:
I do not address APR, but httpd. So even if APR seems to need make
(while I am not really convince that ant cannot makes the job)., ant
could be use for the httpd build process.
The biggest body of work that needs to be done during the build is
handled in the ./configure
* Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-07 23:52:11]:
> APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
> Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-13 02:22:18 -0500 (Sun, 13 Nov
> 2005) $]
I think it is time to change the mail's subject regarding of its
contents,
Brian Akins wrote:
r->aborted have multiple values like c->keepalive:
of course, I meant c->aborted.
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Graham Leggett wrote:
At this point the frontend connection has already sent a 200 Ok, it's
already sent headers like Content-Length, etc, at this point there is no
graceful way of handling the error or sending "bad gateway".
I agree. There is no way we can inform the client of the problem.
Plüm wrote:
Stupid question: Can't we enforce at least this by setting
c->keepalive to AP_CONN_CLOSE. Of course this does not solve the problem
to make the remaining parts of the code aware of the bad gateway situation.
Probably, but other modules already check c->aborted. So it would be
best
On Thursday 08 December 2005 12:30, Matthias Behrens wrote:
> hi
>
> does mod_auth_oracle has anything to do with this mailinglist?
No, it's a third-party module. OTOH posting here is not such a bad thing:
its author may subscribe, and it enables me to point you towards ...
> i solved several th
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Just a short reminder. I just got the 3rd duplicate for PR37145
( data loss with httpd-2.0.55 reverse proxy method=post) and I remember myself
that there had been additional cases that had been reported on the list.
Well, I've posted about PR37402 which is also to revert m
I do not address APR, but httpd. So even if APR seems to need make (while I
am not really convince that ant cannot makes the job)., ant could be use for
the httpd build process.
Francis
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, Decemb
hi
does mod_auth_oracle has anything to do with this mailinglist?
i solved several thread issues in it and i wonder if anyone of you would be
interested in my changes?
matthias
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-96?page=all ]
Nicolas Lehuen resolved MODPYTHON-96:
-
Fix Version: 3.2
Resolution: Fixed
> Accessing req.boundary causes crash.
>
>
> Key: MODPYTH
Francis ANDRE wrote:
Why don't you plan to use ant for the building process instead of
namke/make. The major avantage of using ant would be to get a coherent,
unique process for all majors platforms like WXP, Linux, Unix, OS/400,
OS/390
There is still a significant amount of work involved in
i am sorry for the (how often was i sorry again)th time
i scrambled this prob with the partial pages prob.
thx
matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matthias Behrens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2005 11:09
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: PR 3714
Francis ANDRE wrote:
Why don't you plan to use ant for the building process instead of
namke/make. The major avantage of using ant would be to get a coherent,
unique process for all majors platforms like WXP, Linux, Unix, OS/400,
OS/390
Excellent suggestion! Why don't you propose a patch to
hi
we are using apache 2.0.55 win32 for loadbalancing with mod_proxy /
mod_rewrite
i understand there is a much easier way now with 2.2 which provides
loadbalancing depending on throughput or requestcount
thats a pretty good feature but something that would really kick ass would
be if the proxy
Why don't you plan to use ant for the building process instead of
namke/make. The major avantage of using ant would be to get a coherent,
unique process for all majors platforms like WXP, Linux, Unix, OS/400,
OS/390
FA
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Matthias, he just said yes, the patch attached to PR 37145 is already been
added and solves the problem, but needs to be backported for 2.0.56, which
a few of us already vote +1 (yes) that it's a good solution.
Apply the patch and you should no longer see these problems. They are most
marked whe
ok i have to apologize again. there are so many mails and i just cant read
them all. could you please tell me (i am shure you have done this before .-)
if this patch 37145 resolves that prob.
we are using 2.0.55 and seem to have exactly this problem. jet it happend
just a few times. we use mod_pro
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
No, you understood its purpose correctly. I have no idea what Justin
is talking about -- maybe the proxy's connection to the outbound server?
c->aborted is only set on the inbound connection when a previous write
to that connection has failed.
Setting the inbound c->abor
41 matches
Mail list logo
