A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
but implementation of the
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging
On 12/5/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
BTW, in respect of what version of mod_python we write examples for, my
preference would be that we target mod_python 3.3 and then as followup by way
of embedded notes, footnotes or subpages, indicate how it may have to be
changed to work with older versions or whether
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative
but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/%
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 15:46:53 +0530
Manish Chakravarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using apache 1.3.37, and am trying to write a module for it.
I know of no possible way to debug it. Can someone please give some
pointers/tips?
would gdb on GNU/LInux be a better choice?
Hi,
I am developing a module (using OpenSSL) for apache 2.2.3 and wonder how
to make it thread safe.
That module uses EVP_EncryptUpdate (and friends) so I have to use
'CRYPTO_set_id_callback' and 'CRYPTO_set_locking_callback' to make the
code thread safe. But I am not sure what will happen
Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2006, 15:46 +0530 schrieb Manish Chakravarty:
The module has gotten pretty complex. I am using visual studio 2003 to
develop it.
I know of no possible way to debug it. Can someone please give some
pointers/tips?
would gdb on GNU/LInux be a better choice?
I am using
On 12/5/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern
Martin Stoufer wrote ..
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Martin
Have you been noticing the feedback on the mod_python developers
list about the session examples you are posting to the wiki? I ask as
you are getting various things wrong, with your examples actually
being neither robust nor
Everyone,
I just got around to reading the email from the list regarding the
session/class pages I put up. I think it's best that I take them down
for the time being until I have a better handle on things. Aside from
the few typos I made, the content up there isn't what it should be.
I'm
+1
Roy
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:45:48 +0100
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a module (using OpenSSL) for apache 2.2.3 and wonder
how to make it thread safe.
Is OpenSSL not thread-safe?
If it's not, how does mod_ssl deal with it? And if it is, where's
the problem?
So my question
On 12/05/2006 07:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:45:48 +0100
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a module (using OpenSSL) for apache 2.2.3 and wonder
how to make it thread safe.
Is OpenSSL not thread-safe?
An SSL_CTX can't be cross-threaded. If the scope of use of that CTX is
Anyone got any ideas about how we can run a semi informal review process
on any major new additions. When a page has been up for a while just going
in and making them change is reasonable, but if the person is in the process
of still putting it together what is the best way of providing feedback.
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Anyone got any ideas about how we can run a semi informal review process
on any major new additions. When a page has been up for a while just going
in and making them change is reasonable, but if the person is in the process
of still putting it together what is the best
There needs to be some formal vetting process where proposed pages are
critically reviewed by the people in the know. So far I see this being
Graham and Jim G**. This requires that some separation of the Wiki
occurs soon. In one area, the qualified, valid, correct pages are stored
allowing
Hi --
The short version of this email is, please, can people review
this patch for server/request.c and see if it breaks anything?
There are versions for trunk and 2.2.x. Thanks in advance!
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/walk_cache/
I recently finished setting up mod_dav
- Original Message -
From: Joachim Zobel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 1:59 pm
Subject: Re: How do normal developers debug apachemodules?
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Am Dienstag, den 05.12.2006, 15:46 +0530 schrieb Manish Chakravarty:
The module has gotten
On 12/5/06, Martin Stoufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There needs to be some formal vetting process where proposed pages are
critically reviewed by the people in the know. So far I see this being
Graham and Jim G**. This requires that some separation of the Wiki
occurs soon. In one area, the
On 12/5/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/05/2006 07:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:45:48 +0100
Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am developing a module (using OpenSSL) for apache 2.2.3 and wonder
how to make it thread safe.
Is OpenSSL not thread-safe?
Yes and no. http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/threads.html says:
OpenSSL
25 matches
Mail list logo
