On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:52 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> 2008/4/11 Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some
> > background info on the interface with the different MPM
> > modes/implementations? I'm not even su
2008/4/11 Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some
> background info on the interface with the different MPM
> modes/implementations? I'm not even sure where the different
> implementations are in the source tree, but I
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some
background info on the interface with the different MPM
modes/implementations? I'm not even sure where the different
implementations are in the source tree, but I'm curious to take a look
if someone could point me in the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
The implementation of the function. IMHO it must be the same in all
modules. Otherwise it depends on the module load order what gets
called and done.
True -- an alternative might be to do the following:
- #define AUTHN/Z_PROVIDER_VERSION "0" in mod_auth.h
- change all
> Any more details in which situations you see memory leaks? The same leaks
> should happen on trunk as well.
Yes, I verified that it leaks with trunk version too.
Regards,
Basant.
>>> On 4/10/2008 at 2:00 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ruediger
Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10.04.2008 18:11, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> On 4/10/2008 at 12:12 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Ruediger
>> Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On 10.04.2008 00:49, [EMAIL PROTECTE
>>> On 4/9/2008 at 11:08 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris
Darroch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Darroch wrote:
>
>>Here's another thought: for people doing mass virtual hosting,
>> and who let their customers put authn/z directives into .htaccess
>> files with "AllowOverride Auth
On 10.04.2008 22:09, Basant Kukreja wrote:
Here is some more performance results based on Ruediger's suggestion :
Thanks for this.
-
test2.html : 500 substitution s/hello/hi/g.
Requests Per Second (RPS) as measured by ab
On 10.04.2008 21:47, Chris Darroch wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Lets hope that we never decide to change anything to
authn_ap_list_provider_names. Otherwise I bet that we run into
inconsistencies which might be hard to track and lead to funny bug
reports.
So I feel -0.5 on this.
Do you m
On 02.12.2007 02:10, Graham Leggett wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
You created a new kept_body input filter, which seems exactly right
to me. But you're storing the kept body on the request_rec itself,
which looks like extra complexity.
Why not make the new filter into its own module, and keep the ke
Sorry this is a bit OT but I'm not sure what to do next and would
really appreciate some ideas.
One of my clients is seeing an FPE in ld-linux-x86-64.so when loading
a custom PHP extension. The backtrace is inlined below.
At least I assume it's blowing up loading my extension - with my
extension
Here is some more performance results based on Ruediger's suggestion :
-
test2.html : 500 substitution s/hello/hi/g.
Requests Per Second (RPS) as measured by ab for s/hello/hi/ substitution.
Enabled CPUs : 1
testname Con
On 09.04.2008 19:08, Chris Darroch wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
Writing that all out it mostly just seems like a depressingly
large amount of work, but otherwise feels like it might offer a
way forward, both for people upgrading from 2.2 and those starting
fresh with 2.4. Thoughts?
From a
On 10.04.2008 18:11, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 4/10/2008 at 12:12 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ruediger
Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10.04.2008 00:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes Date: Wed Apr 9 15:49:31 2008 New Revision:
646582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Lets hope that we never decide to change anything to
authn_ap_list_provider_names. Otherwise I bet that we run into inconsistencies
which might be hard to track and lead to funny bug reports.
So I feel -0.5 on this.
Do you mean changing the function definition, or the
On 09.04.2008 19:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: chrisd
Date: Wed Apr 9 10:25:33 2008
New Revision: 646445
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646445&view=rev
Log:
Let each consumer of authn providers redefine the list_provider_names
callback in case they are loaded individually without
Was going over some old e-mails. If you guys at apachecon need something to
discuss/argue, how about getting a fastcgi and xendfile implementation into
core httpd?
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:27:15AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Basant Kukreja wrote:
>>> just that, too. Any performance comparisons with its competitors?
>> Some quick performance comparison results between mod_sed, mod_line_edit
>> and
>> mod_substitute.
>>
>> Se
>>> On 4/10/2008 at 12:12 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ruediger
Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10.04.2008 00:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: bnicholes Date: Wed Apr 9 15:49:31 2008 New Revision:
646582
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646582&view=rev Log: Move the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could it be because you've included mod_auth_form, but not included
> mod_session?
I used the default configure setting for each. Looking now, I have
mod_auth_form but not mod_auth_session. So the default inclusion
ru
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I need this to build trunk:
Why nobody else?
Could it be because you've included mod_auth_form, but not included
mod_session?
mod_session may need to export itself using optional functions, will
take a look.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Crypto
I need this to build trunk:
Index: modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c
===
--- modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c (revision 646781)
+++ modules/aaa/mod_auth_form.c (working copy)
@@ -498,9 +498,9 @@
}
ap_session_load_fn(r, &z);
-ap_se
On 10 Apr 2008, at 12:44, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Furthermore from a first glance of mod_sed I would guess that it
runs into
trouble with large static files. So could you test mod_sed with one of
the simple cases above and a 3 GB file and monitor httpd's memory
consumption
in comparison to
Akins, Brian wrote:
This kind of stuff belongs in a
common place.
Doesn't libapreq do this??
Do what exactly?
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 4/10/08 7:05 AM, "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kind of stuff belongs in a
> common place.
Doesn't libapreq do this??
--
Brian Akins
Chief Operations Engineer
Turner Digital Media Technologies
On 10.04.2008 13:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Basant Kukreja wrote:
just that, too. Any performance comparisons with its competitors?
Some quick performance comparison results between mod_sed,
mod_line_edit and
mod_substitute.
Search/Replace string : s/hello/hi/
test
On Apr 9, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Basant Kukreja wrote:
just that, too. Any performance comparisons with its competitors?
Some quick performance comparison results between mod_sed,
mod_line_edit and
mod_substitute.
Search/Replace string : s/hello/hi/
test0.html : No matches, so no substitute.
tes
Nick Kew wrote:
c.f. my mod_form (at apache.webthing.com), which does just that,
providing optional functions for other modules to access the
form data.
This is upside down - modules should not have to do anything at all to
get a possibly inserted request body or form data. What happens when
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
New features belong in modules so that they don't get compiled into
the server by those of us who don't want that feature. I don't recall
why or how KeptBodySize made it into http_filter (where it does not
belong),
but I am quite certain that the core will not be parsin
On Apr 9, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
-1. Bloat like this belongs in a module.
This piece of code depends on the KeptBodySize directive, which is
part of the http_filter, and sits alongside ap_discard_request_body().
I can move it into another module, b
On 9 Apr 2008, at 17:33, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:07:33PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
I don't understand why *that* stuff needed to be in the core. It is
certainly possible to consume then reinject the request body,
without
changing one line of core fi
31 matches
Mail list logo
