dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: William A. Rowe, Jr. > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 04:06 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R > > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26? >

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" ] > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 15:19 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R > > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: William A. Rowe, Jr. > > Ge

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 28, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Would be nice if someone had time to polish mod_proxy_fcgi Come January, I have free cycles... Dec, esp before Christmas will be tight. But this is something that I really want to spend some time on.

Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 28, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Hi dev@, FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. As in the previous 2.${odd} release cycles, this is not a stable release, do not guarantee a stable ABI, and would not be

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 28, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for T&R on the weekend? As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. Actually, it was 2.62 which had problems. 2.61 is preferred.

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 11/28/2008 06:35 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool

Fw: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Nick Kew
Not sure what happened to this yesterday ... reposting. Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:32:50 + From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha Paul Querna wrote: > Hi dev@, > > FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our fi

Re: Fw: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Nick Kew wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: >> Hi dev@, >> >> FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in >> about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. > > How about starting the process not with a roll, but with a proposed > software configuration and feature set? IMHO, that's the

Re: Fw: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Paul Querna
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Nick Kew wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Hi dev@, FYI, I intend to roll 2.3.0-alpha, our first release from trunk in about 3 years, on Saturday December 6th. How about starting the process not with a roll, but with a proposed software configuration and feature set? IMH

Re: Fw: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Graham Leggett
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: IMHO, that's the difference between having a dialog and having something in hand to comment on. With the .0-alpha tarball, people could make a specific comment, such as [T +10 days from now]... Am I right in understanding that it remains possible to make changes to

Re: Fw: Intent to Roll 2.3.0-alpha

2008-11-29 Thread Paul Querna
Graham Leggett wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: IMHO, that's the difference between having a dialog and having something in hand to comment on. With the .0-alpha tarball, people could make a specific comment, such as [T +10 days from now]... Am I right in understanding that it remains poss

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-11-29 15:49:36 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group napisał(a): > > > -Urspr�ngliche Nachricht- > > Von: "Pl�m, R�diger, VF-Group" ] > > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 15:19 > > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R > > > > > > > >

Re: svn commit: r712611 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf.in

2008-11-29 Thread Rainer Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Author: pquerna > Date: Sun Nov 9 21:48:21 2008 > New Revision: 712611 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=712611&view=rev > Log: > Add Simple MPM to example mpm config. > > Submited by: Ryan Phillips > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/extra/http

Re: Reviewing and voting season

2008-11-29 Thread Ruediger Pluem
There are now 3 (new) patches left which miss only one vote. I will wait some time with T&R to see whether they get the missing vote. So vote now :-). Regards Rüdiger On 11/24/2008 10:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Given the fact that we want to T&R next weekend I guess we have > reviewing and v

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/29/2008 08:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > 2008-11-29 15:49:36 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group napisał(a): >>> -Urspr�ngliche Nachricht- >>> Von: "Pl�m, R�diger, VF-Group" ] >>> Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 15:19 >>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >>> Betreff: Re: Pre

dev@httpd.apache.org

2008-11-29 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-11-29 22:47:45 Ruediger Pluem napisał(a): > > On 11/29/2008 08:17 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > > 2008-11-29 15:49:36 Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group napisał(a): > >>> -Urspr�ngliche Nachricht- > >>> Von: "Pl�m, R�diger, VF-Group" ] > >>> Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 20