Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Nick, "It works!" ... but needs to have mpm_common.h included I notice it takes about 4 seconds to serve the "It works" page on this P4 3.0G HT, 2.5G DDR2 XP VC6 Gregg --- modules/arch/win32/mod_win32.c(revision 724570) +++ modules/arch/win32/mod_win32.c(working copy) @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: Am I missing something? [Mon Dec 08 13:21:17 2008] [crit] Server MUST relinquish startup privileges before accepting connections. Please ensure mod_unixd or other system security module is loaded. Configuration Failed Probably not. Looks like this'll be broken on al

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: > > The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org. > > > > All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda > > needs some more thought. > > My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refacto

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

2008/12/9 William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Querna wrote: >> >> The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org. >> >> All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda >> needs some more thought. > > My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (wh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: > > The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org. > > All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda > needs some more thought. My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refactored, but was bogusly introduced for mod_ne

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: Paul Querna wrote: The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate, mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which seems to work as a work around for now. We are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: > The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate, > mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are > still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which seems > to work as a work around for now. We are now running wit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

While we are at it; If mod_mem_cache is no longer going to be used, needs to be removed from makefile.win Gregg Paul Querna wrote: Gregg L. Smith wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:     http://httpd.apache.org/dev/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: > Gregg L. Smith wrote: >> >> [Mon Dec 08 13:21:17 2008] [crit] Server MUST relinquish startup >> privileges before accepting connections. Please ensure mod_unixd or >> other system security module is loaded. >> Configuration Failed > > I'm guessing no one updated the winnt mpm

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Gregg L. Smith wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008. Thanks, Paul -? tested on Windows XP

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008. Thanks, Paul -? tested on Windows XP built both VS9 and VS6

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mod_luau +1. -- justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; ±1 [ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008. -1 for these two reasons: 1) Default build doesn't work with

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: http

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Brian McCallister wrote: I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk. The obvious name, mod_lua, is a b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Dec 8, 2008, at 11:40 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Graham Leggett wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version. Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 11:55 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote: >> >>> Brian McCallister wrote: I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is likely to confuse users, partic

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Brian McCallister wrote: >>> I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is >>> likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk. >>> >>> The obvious name, mod_lua, is a bit tricky as t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.11

>>> On 12/6/2008 at 9:30 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > Your votes please; > > +/-1 > [ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA > > Regards > > Rüdig

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Graham Leggett wrote: > Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for >> rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version. >> >> Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions. > > If we don't trust our own softwar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.11

On Dec 6, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA +1 Darwin x86 +1 FreeBSD 7-STABLE x86 +1 NetBSD 3.1 S. Details: Tested with PHP 5.2.7. Good signatures and hashes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dist $ gpg --verify httpd-2.2.11.tar.gz.asc gpg: Signature made Sat

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Brian McCallister wrote: >>> >>> I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is >>> likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk.

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jim Jagielski > Gesendet: Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 14:38 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha > > > On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: > > > > > >

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alp

Re: AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Dec 8, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Paul Querna Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alp

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Querna > Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha > > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: > > http://httpd.apac

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Paul Querna > Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 08:18 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha > > Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at: > > http://httpd.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.11

Ruediger Pluem wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Your votes please; +/-1 [ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA Regards Rüdiger +1 Tested on: * tfm32 Server * tfm64 Server Regards, Mihai Moldovanu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: If that is the reason that e.g. the Velocity site broke, I am +1 for rolling this back to a known stable 2.2.x version. Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions. If we don't trust our own software to run in production, who else will?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> Our production sites IMHO shouldn't be guinea pigs for -alpha versions. > > Best. Place. Ever. to try out our stuff to find and fix bugs. > > Especially nasty

Re: changing mod_wombat's name

On Dec 7, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Brian McCallister wrote: I know some folks are attached to the wombat moniker, but the name is likely to confuse users, particularly now that it is in trunk. The obvious name, mod_lua, is a bit tricky as there are about half a dozen projects named