The leak of a bucket brigade into the pool shouldn't be
noticable. The problem with all previous releases is that
apreq_brigade_fwrite would leak badly when dealing with
spool buckets- the current RC/trunk should fix that problem.
--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Pratik pratikn...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Michael Koziarski mich...@koziarski.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Joe Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The leak of a bucket brigade into the pool
shouldn't be
noticable. The problem with all previous releases is
that
apreq_brigade_fwrite
That is correct.
Awesome, thanks!
--
Cheers
Koz
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Philip M. Gollucci
pgollu...@p6m7g8.com wrote:
Michael Koziarski wrote:
It should definitely not be deprecated. Its kind of 'core' to the
module.
But unless I'm mistaken, it'll just silently fail in these situations
with malformed bodies? What would be
Hello All,
I am trying to add tproxy4
(http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/) support to
the mod_proxy to achieve transparency. It basically involves a kernel
patch which allows binding of a socket to foreign address among other
things. At the app layer we only need to set the
Hi,
I am facing problem about how to share context between input filter and
output filter which are registered through different hooks.
Here is description of the problem:
static void
mod_realsecure_register_hooks (apr_pool_t * p)
{
ap_hook_child_init
Hi, all
I have signed the two documents(
http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan version to
secretary at apache.org.
So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major contributors and
ask for the agreement
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:41:14PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:20:40 2008
New Revision: 726109
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726109view=rev
Log:
mod_ssl: Make the size of the per-dir-reneg request-body buffer
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The leak of a bucket brigade into the pool shouldn't be
noticable. The problem with all previous releases is that
apreq_brigade_fwrite would leak badly when dealing with
spool buckets- the current RC/trunk should fix
pqf wrote:
I have signed the two documents
( http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan
version to secretary at apache.org.
So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major contributors
and ask for the agreement to
Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
I have signed the two documents
( http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/iclas), and emailed the scan
version to secretary at apache.org.
So what I should do next is? Should I contact all major contributors
On 12/16/2008 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
pqf wrote:
For the moment, though, I think we're just waiting for some
feedback from other httpd developers and especially those with
some experience of the Incubator process. I or someone else likely
needs to
Actually, -1
Calling it luau is begging for mass user confusion via misspelings in
the LoadModule directive.
How about:
ap_lua, moon, or just bite the bullet and use mod_lua
-Brian
2008/12/8 Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Roy T. Fielding
2008/12/17 Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org:
Actually, -1
Calling it luau is begging for mass user confusion via misspelings in
the LoadModule directive.
How about:
ap_lua, moon, or just bite the bullet and use mod_lua
Given that there could be a class of such scripting language modules
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Given that there could be a class of such scripting language modules
over time, why not:
mod_script_lua
to make it more clear for what purpose it may be. Then fits in with
auth and proxy related modules having common prefix.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Did anyone test this on Windows?
I ask as I am trying connectiontimeout=160ms as part of my Apache 2.2.11
configuration and am getting a configuration error. I get the same
error with ping and other parameters which now use
ap_timeout_parameter_parse().
My BalanceMember looks something
On 12/16/2008 11:17 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Did anyone test this on Windows?
I stumbled across the same issue on Red Hat AS 5 today.
Try to patch your APR with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=727052view=rev
from APR trunk. This should fix this.
I ask as I am trying connectiontimeout=160ms
On 12/16/2008 10:44 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
2008/12/17 Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org:
Actually, -1
Calling it luau is begging for mass user confusion via misspelings in
the LoadModule directive.
How about:
ap_lua, moon, or just bite the bullet and use mod_lua
Given that
wouldn't something like mod_lang_lua be better. Since not all future modules
could be script language.
Then again mod_lang_xx does look a bit odd.
~Jorge
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Given that there could be a class of
Thanks!
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/16/2008 11:17 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Did anyone test this on Windows?
I stumbled across the same issue on Red Hat AS 5 today.
Try to patch your APR with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=727052view=rev
from APR trunk. This should fix this.
I
The errno assignments you added did the trick.
Unfortunately, I'm still missing the overall goal. I have many proxy
balance members like:
BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8010 route=tomcat1 min=16 max=80
smax=40 ttl=900 keepalive=Off timeout=9 retry=30
connectiontimeout=160ms
Yeah, that can be confusing with the natural language directives/concepts.
mod_script_lua
mod_embedded_lua (me likee this one)
I'm also fine with just taking mod_lua. mod_luau doesn't seem bad, and
I don't think there'd be typos: the directives would probably be
LuaSomething anyways.
Cheers,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Greg Stein gst...@apache.org wrote:
Yeah, that can be confusing with the natural language directives/concepts.
mod_script_lua
mod_embedded_lua (me likee this one)
mod_core_lua?
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
The lua mailing list is also discussing mod_wombat and the name, hah.
Andre is very happy to yield the mod_lua name used in kepler to
mod_wombat :-)
-Brian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andre Carregal carre...@fabricadigital.com.br
Date: Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:17 PM
Subject: Re:
Another suggestion from the lua mailing list, and not a bad one...
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Jeff Pohlmeyer
yetanotherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a thought...
The Apache PHP module is named mod_php5 and a quick google search
for mod_lua5 returned no results here.
- Jeff
I think it would be a bad idea to tie it to a specific version.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 19:59, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
Another suggestion from the lua mailing list, and not a bad one...
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Jeff Pohlmeyer
yetanotherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a
26 matches
Mail list logo
