On 12/16/2008 10:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Chris Darroch wrote: >> pqf wrote: >>
>> For the moment, though, I think we're just waiting for some >> feedback from other httpd developers and especially those with >> some experience of the Incubator process. I or someone else likely >> needs to draft and submit a proposal to the Incubator, for example, >> as a next step. Any thoughts here from other folks? > > I'd prefer that we simply sponsor this effort under the httpd PMC here > at our project. > > We have to file an IP code clearance through the Incubator, but that's > relatively simple (and a good part is finished already now that the > appropriate paperwork is filed with the secretary). > > Does anyone feel that the addition of mod_fcgid should be driven through > the incubator? Speaking first hand, it didn't resolve the shortcomings > of lack of community behind mod_aspdotnet, and didn't really give mod_ftp > the visibility it needed (and attracted once it graduated). So for most > existing modules, I don't think it solves many of the problems we might > or might not face here at httpd. +1. I see no need to put it in the incubator, except for the IP code clearance paperwork. So it seems that the above fast track through the incubator to do just that should be enough. Afterwards put it in trunk and lets see how we can 'merge' it with mod_proxy_fcgi. Regards Rüdiger
