Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> Some people seem to indicate, that the implementation of pgp is safer,
> on the other hand md5sum etc. have a builtin check option (-c), so you
> can run them directly against the checksum file to compares the checksum
> in the checksum file with a freshly computed checksum
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> [ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
With +1's recorded from chrisd, trawick and wrowe, the package is
released as-beta (due principally to the more experimental auth issues
and terse documentation).
I've staged the release, and in response to the details from Rainer,
I
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> sorry, didnt look closely enough, please forgive - fixed with r815577.
No bother :) Not sure it's worth rerolling for, but the other item you
pointed out might be more significant. Looking at it.
Hi,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> Wouldn't this be
>
> if (!is_list && ((fsc->options & FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST) || dashl)) {
>
> as there is no point otherwise? Actually we could drop the !is_list test,
> considering that forced-override isn't harmful.
sorry, didnt look closely enough, please fo
fua...@apache.org wrote:
> /* Special FTPOption that maps NLST directly to LIST */
> -if (!is_list && (fsc->options & FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST) || dashl) {
> +if ((!is_list && (fsc->options & FTP_OPT_NLSTISLIST)) || dashl) {
> is_list = 1;
> }
Wouldn't this be
if (!is_list
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
>> But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday night, after
>> seven days of voting.
>
> And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it seems appropriate to begin a vote
> for diss
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> But I wouldn't like to see any new roadblocks to getting out the first
> alpha/beta of 2.3.x, at long last.
(and that goes for mod_fcgid as well, which should also go to trunk once
we've got just one release from trunk, and I'm guessing that vote will fly
with broa
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
>
> Problems I see in no particular order;
>
> 1. Two subproject votes called simultaneously totaling 3 concurrent open
> votes (fcgid, ftp, ServerTokens OFF), and a one "let's get this ready to
> vote" (httpd 2.3.3). That's a lot to chew on, especially with all the
> other
Bill,
Mario just told me that there's no mod_ftp Win32 binary yet:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
maybe you can one upload?
Gün.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> You misunderstood my comment (possibly because I didn't write it
> clearly). What I meant by
>
> "Why not simply zap all these checks of the form
>
> if (silly user specified no-argument option again) {
> remind them who is boss
> }
>
> to avoid code bloat?"
>
> is tha
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Sander Temme schrieb:
> > So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
> > into trunk.
> +1
>
mod_ftp currently supports Apache 2.0 and 2.2 as well.
I think the natural order is to first establish a stable, unbun
Sander Temme wrote:
>
> So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
> into trunk.
You read my mind; not that ftp needs to be in trunk (that would be cool),
but that trunk has not been released in 4 years, which is a far more serious
issue than mod_ftp's 15 months :)
S
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >> [X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
> >
> > But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday night,
> after
> > seven days of voting.
>
> And in 18 hours, wit
Sander Temme schrieb:
> So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it
> into trunk.
+1
Gün.
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> I'd suggest you just let the vote stay, and once mod_cgid is out maybe
> some more get to mod_ftp ...
I'm happy to do so, if Sander, yourself or others are interested in voting.
I'm unwilling to have an open ended vote thread dangling forever, of course.
A decision should b
Headline: Policy kills and up-and-coming star
Problems I see in no particular order;
1. Two subproject votes called simultaneously totaling 3 concurrent open
votes (fcgid, ftp, ServerTokens OFF), and a one "let's get this ready to
vote" (httpd 2.3.3). That's a lot to chew on, especially with a
On Sep 14, 2009, at 9:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday
night, after
seven days of voting.
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it s
On 9/15/09 3:18 PM, "Paul Querna" wrote:
> I would prefer to just put it into the log file like Dan did.. not
> everyone uses apachectl :)
+1
--
Brian Akins
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Dan Poirier wrote:
>> I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
>>
>> The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
>> and a directory full of various revisions of the server configura
Dan Poirier wrote:
> I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
>
> The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
> and a directory full of various revisions of the server configuration
> file, and can only guess which of the configuration files was
I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
and a directory full of various revisions of the server configuration
file, and can only guess which of the configuration files was actually
being used.
Loggin
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > Just zap the check since it is unnecessary.
>
> So first you suggest that all the checks be collapsed down to one check,
>
I don't recall doing that, though I did suggest that if we keep the checks
we don't need t
bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
--- Comment #12 from Will Rowe 2009-09-15 09:58:13 PDT ---
It would be good not to add new grammar to the config (e.g. FrontController).
Default has the issues raised on the dev@ list discussion thread. Fallba
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad
>> on a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that
>> we use for the semaphore got c
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Just zap the check since it is unnecessary.
So first you suggest that all the checks be collapsed down to one check,
and after being asked for an example of how the one check might work,
you're now suggesting that the checks be removed entirely?
> Ignoring the opinion that
2009/9/15 Rich Bowen :
> FallbackHandler and FrontController both make a lot of sense to me.
> FrontController seems like it might be more "correct", in terms of accepted
> usage in the larger world out there, but either one makes me happy.
Looks like a name was found (or not). :-)
Besides the n
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Also, since its beta state we should probably also take test results of
> non-commiters into account, f.e. Mario and Jorge?
We *always* (that is all of us, PMC members) consider everyone's votes and
commentary on all releases.
Although they are not binding, they are very im
Nick Kew wrote:
>
> Bill, I'd be happy to support this in principle, but I have no use case to
> motivate me. In other words, sorry I'm lazy.
Nick, it's not targetted at you, or any other specific PMC member. It's
more of a concern that we need three people in the project who -are-
interested t
Brian J. France wrote:
...
There is one draw back to this patch in that there could be duplicated
values in the headers. Both mod_dav_acl and mod_caldav want to add the
REPORT in the Allow header, so it would show up twice in the list. I am
not sure if this is a major problem, but wanted to
Hi Mario,
Mario Brandt schrieb:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> wrote:
>> Please share your thoughts on the topic.
>
> I like that module.Since I have only one sever to configure /
> maintain. I use 0.9.2 from Günther since 2007 on my windows dev
> server. 0.9.5 compiles
Hi Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
> And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it seems appropriate to begin a vote
> for dissolving mod_ftp from the httpd project. Please share your thoughts
> on the topic.
please dont do that! Maybe that currently folks are otherwise busy (me
too), but that sho
On Sep 11, 2009, at 5:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler,
NotFoundAction, MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible
variations that don't contain the misleading word "Default"?
FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggest
FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler|
Action].
If this mirrors the behavior of Action (in the way variables are
presented
to the fallback resource) then FallbackAction makes the most sense.
If it is restricted to a filespec at the same dir level, then perhaps
Fal
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
> * Should we yank the squatting logic? I think it is doing us more harm
> than good. IIRC it was put in to make the server respond faster when the
> workload is spikey.
It finally occurred to me what you meant by spikey: triggering
MaxSpareTh
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > Why does opt need to be cast to (int)?
>
> >From the printf man page:
>
> c The int argument is converted to an unsigned char, and the
> resulting character is written.
>
That's what happens
Petr Hracek wrote:
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c->output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Those are protocol modules. So anything-HTTP is not relevant to them.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_pass_brigade(r->output_filter,bb);
then it is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Petr Hracek wrote:
> I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
> ap_pass_brigade(c->output_filters,bb);
> and in smtp_core is usage the same.
These are both modules that provide a non-HTTP protocol over the
connection. If that doesn't match your module, you'r
Petr Hracek wrote:
> I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
> ap_pass_brigade(c->output_filters,bb);
> and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Neither of these modules implement http, so don't use them as examples
of how an http module should be implemented.
> Unfortunatelly when I am using
I have found mod_nntp_like where is mention in
ap_pass_brigade(c->output_filters,bb);
and in smtp_core is usage the same.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_pass_brigade(r->output_filter,bb);
then it is not working. Web page is not show.
Is it neccessary to configure Apache for using brigade and b
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Why does opt need to be cast to (int)?
>From the printf man page:
c The int argument is converted to an unsigned char, and the
resulting character is written.
> Why not simply zap all these checks of the form
>
> if (silly user specified no-argumen
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Fri Sep 11 23:57:48 2009
> New Revision: 814091
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=814091&view=rev
> Log:
> htcacheclean: 19 ways to fail, 1 error message. Fixed.
>
> Modified:
>httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES
>httpd/httpd
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Greg Ames wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a problem where apparently the accept mutex went bad on
> a z/OS system running the worker MPM. I'm guessing that some memory that we
> use for the semaphore got clobbered but don't have proof yet. The error log
> looks lik
Petr Hracek wrote:
> I do not understand of this thing.
> Could you please tell me if I have already connection between browser
> and apache server why I should use request_rec->output_filters instead
> of request_rec->connection->output_filters?
>
> I thought that if connection is established th
I do not understand of this thing.
Could you please tell me if I have already connection between browser and
apache server why I should use request_rec->output_filters instead of
request_rec->connection->output_filters?
I thought that if connection is established than request_rec->connection
shoul
Brian J. France wrote:
> Jari is the original author of mod_dav_acl, which requires patches to
> httpd to work. I need the same functionality added to httpd to get a
> mod_dav_acl type module working, so I have split up his patch into
> smaller pieces. Can a patch be under a different license th
Petr Hracek wrote:
> in my apache module (written in C) are sended data to the client side
> over buckets and brigades.
> Function for send these date is:
> apr_status_t send_data_to_client(request_rec *r, char * data_to_send,
> int length_data)
> {
> apr_bucket_brigade * bb =
> apr_brigade_cr
I see a crash caused by SSL_free in ssl_filter_io_shutdown:
#0 0x002a96b42879 in kill () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1
#2 0x002a959dcc97 in ASN1_template_free () from /lib64/libcrypto.so.4
#3 0x002a959dcc11 in ASN1_primitive_free () from /lib64/libcrypto.so.4
#4 0x002a959dccf7
On 15 Sep 2009, at 05:43, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 0.9.5-beta
But with a single vote, I'll declare this vote DOA on Tuesday
night, after
seven days of voting.
And in 18 hours, with no other voters, it see
Brian J. France wrote:
> While Jari's mod_dav_acl is licensed under LGPL, can the patches to
> httpd be licensed that way?
>
> What would we need to do to get them added if Jari's patches (or even
> mod_dav_acl) would fall under LGPL?
All Jari would need to do is email the list to confirm that h
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:43 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
>Please share your thoughts on the topic.
I like that module.Since I have only one sever to configure /
maintain. I use 0.9.2 from Günther since 2007 on my windows dev
server. 0.9.5 compiles fine on VS9 and runs well.
Mario
50 matches
Mail list logo
