Weird, because I'm tracing the entry to post-config in my code and the second
phase seems to be called 8 times which on my system is the value listed in the
StartServers
directive.
On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Sorin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 23:40, Michael Durket
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Michael Durket
dur...@highwire.stanford.edu wrote:
Weird, because I'm tracing the entry to post-config in my code and the second
phase seems to be called 8 times which on my system is the value listed in
the StartServers
directive.
Sounds like you're either
Actually, I think it had to do with my trace function. Instead of using an
ap_log_error call
I was using fprintf for a very quick-and-dirty solution. Once I stopped doing
that the
multiple copies of the messages went away. I thought I could get away with
using fprintf this time, but obviously
Joe Orton wrote:
1) why do we need a new config directive for session ticket support?
I'm struggling to understand why any server admin would need/want
control over support for session tickets.
Session tickets are a relatively new thing (RFC 4507 is from May 2006),
and I'm not sure how well
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
- Supporting prefork as httpd does now; and
I'm very happy to see prefork die it's timely death.
Let's go about working out where out-of-process magic happens.
Gated, single threaded handlers may be sensible in some cases.
But for the core server it makes async
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 13:09 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Apache httpd does lots of things right.
We must resist the temptation to throw out what we do right, while we
try move forward fixing what we do wrong.
And there is also a reason why Google's Chome is essentially (pre)fork.
This model
On Nov 9, 2009, at 12:57 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Hello dev@,
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
I will bundle APR from the 1.4.x branch. (APR people should make a
release, but this shouldn't be a blocker for our own alpha releases).
+1
I am almost
On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:09 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
- Supporting prefork as httpd does now; and
I'm very happy to see prefork die it's timely death.
Let's go about working out where out-of-process magic happens.
Gated, single threaded handlers may be sensible
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:13 AM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Nov 11 15:13:31 2009
New Revision: 834900
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=834900view=rev
Log:
Follow up the awk compatibility fix in r834729 by selecting the most
suitable awk, following the
Jeff Trawick wrote:
2009/11/9 pqf p...@mailtech.cn:
Hi, all
I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to
mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is
it a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a
On 11/10/09 6:20 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see a few network threads multiplexing all the writing
to clients.
That's what I meant. I just didn't state it properly.
Then take all of *that*, and spread it across several processes for
solid uptime, with a master
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:14, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 11/10/09 6:20 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see a few network threads multiplexing all the writing
to clients.
That's what I meant. I just didn't state it properly.
Then take all of *that*,
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
I will bundle APR from the 1.4.x branch. (APR people should make a
release, but this shouldn't be a blocker for our own alpha releases).
Major problem; don't do this. You are
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
I will bundle APR from the 1.4.x branch. (APR people should make a
release, but this shouldn't be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Greg Stein wrote:
Right. But they don't have the depth/breadth of modules like we do.
... yet. Keep going, but if there are great things like lighttpd and nginx (and
even more) http
daemons out there, then that means more than one thing is wrong
Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
I will bundle APR from the 1.4.x branch. (APR people should make a
release, but
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
-1 for bundled package httpd-2.3.3-alpha-deps - in fact this isn't up to
date w.r.t. pcre 8.
Otherwise,
rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Wed Nov 11 20:27:10 2009
New Revision: 835046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=835046view=rev
Log:
* Use correct #ifndef's to compile again on openssl 0.9.8 and fix compiler
warnings.
ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, s,
On 11/11/2009 09:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Wed Nov 11 20:27:10 2009
New Revision: 835046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=835046view=rev
Log:
* Use correct #ifndef's to compile again on openssl 0.9.8 and fix compiler
warnings.
On 11/11/2009 09:45 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/11/2009 09:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Wed Nov 11 20:27:10 2009
New Revision: 835046
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=835046view=rev
Log:
* Use correct #ifndef's to compile
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
On 11/11/2009 08:54 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009.
-1: mod_ssl does not
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I intend to roll a 2.3 alpha release on Wednesday November 11th.
+1
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Silly question; this breaks all 0.9.7 builds, right? Is that deliberate?
It shouldn't. Does it (no 0.9.7 at hand right now)?
No it doesn't:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h Tue
At present, whatever was in errno at the time the dav_error {} was
created is treated as an apr_status_t by ap_log_rerror().
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200211.mbox/%3c20021101033848.b29...@lyra.org%3e
dav_error {} should have an apr_status_t field instead of an errno
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
-1 for bundled package
Paul Querna wrote:
the -deps package does not contain PCRE at all. The only software
contained inside the -deps package is APR and APR-Util, so I am not
quite sure what your comment about PCRE 8 is referencing.
Didn't realize that was dropped...
...if we presume sense and sensibility of
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, whatever was in errno at the time the dav_error {} was
created is treated as an apr_status_t by ap_log_rerror().
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200211.mbox/%3c20021101033848.b29...@lyra.org%3e
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, whatever was in errno at the time the dav_error {} was
created is treated as an apr_status_t by ap_log_rerror().
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as
Don't you think that maybe it's time to drop mod_imagemap and
mod_cern_meta?
there is already a large number of CERN users who can exploit this
module.
Seriously?
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
On 12 Nov 2009, at 01:56, Rich Bowen wrote:
Don't you think that maybe it's time to drop mod_imagemap and mod_cern_meta?
there is already a large number of CERN users who can exploit this module.
Seriously?
mod_imagemap is a perfectly good application module, albeit a minority
interest
Built 2.3.3 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with:
./configure \
--enable-modules=most \
--enable-mods-shared=all \
--with-mpm=event \
--prefix=/usr/local/apache \
and got this on startup:
[Wed Nov 11 20:56:15 2009] [crit] (70023)This function has not been
implemented on this platform: Couldn't create a
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Built 2.3.3 on Mac OS X 10.5.8 with:
./configure \
--enable-modules=most \
--enable-mods-shared=all \
--with-mpm=event \
--prefix=/usr/local/apache \
and got this on startup:
[Wed Nov 11 20:56:15 2009] [crit]
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:09, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
At present, whatever was in errno at the time the dav_error {} was
created is treated as
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:56, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Don't you think that maybe it's time to drop mod_imagemap and mod_cern_meta?
there is already a large number of CERN users who can exploit this module.
Seriously?
I say hell yes.
And my response to a user would be you want
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 15:00, Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
bua...@buanzo.com.ar wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Greg Stein wrote:
Right. But they don't have the depth/breadth of modules like we do.
... yet. Keep going, but if there are great things like lighttpd and
Rich Bowen wrote:
Don't you think that maybe it's time to drop mod_imagemap and mod_cern_meta?
there is already a large number of CERN users who can exploit this module.
Seriously?
LOL
FWIW I know of one customer who absolutely continues to use mod_imagemap and
have no indication they
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 23:21, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Rich Bowen wrote:
Don't you think that maybe it's time to drop mod_imagemap and mod_cern_meta?
there is already a large number of CERN users who can exploit this module.
Seriously?
LOL
FWIW I know of one
Greg Stein wrote:
FWIW I know of one customer who absolutely continues to use mod_imagemap and
have no indication they plan to drop it.
modules/historical/ might be a good waypoint to eliminating these. Enabling
them should emit a warning they are no longer interesting and likely to be
Hello,
I did not get far
inet_pton.c
multicast.c
Generating Code...
Compiling...
socket_util.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21)
: error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type
modifiers
./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
I did not get far
Generating Code...
socket_util.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21)
: error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type
modifiers
./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\srclib\apr\network_io\unix\socket_util.c(21)
: error C2373: 'apr_socket_atreadeof' : redefinition; different type
modifiers
./include\apr_network_io.h(362) : see declaration of
'apr_socket_atreadeof'
This is probably nothing but missing/mismatched
Sorry bout that,
I always try first with VS6 SP6 SDK 2003R2
I'm more curious why it is trying to build the 'unix' file in the first
place since there is a Win32 alternative
Gregg
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello,
I did not get far
Generating Code...
socket_util.c
2009/11/12 Paul Querna p...@querna.org:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.3-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.3 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Sunday November 15 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
What
Hello again,
While were at it.
I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it.
I'll guess this error is because of it but in case it isn't;
Configuration: mod_ldap - Win32
Release
Compiling resources...
Compiling...
util_ldap.c
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hello again,
While were at it.
I dropped in APR/Util 1.3.9 and had a go at it.
Compiling...
util_ldap.c
E:\build\httpd-2.3.3-alpha\modules\ldap\util_ldap.c(2667) : error C2065:
'AP_LDAP_OPT_DEBUG' : undeclared identifier
This looks like a purely httpd error; AP_ is
Hi Bill,
I know this, even better now ;) ... will remember to pay more attention.
Since I have your eyes yet again, makefile.win wants to copy pcre.pdb
but my out-of-tree pcre does not include that file, the .dll is there,
not the pdb. Can this made to make noise only and not stop the copy
50 matches
Mail list logo
