Hi everyone,
I am new to this list and have a question I am sure must be an FAQ, but I
can't find a FAQ associated with this list. Can anyone point me to it? Also
at http://httpd.apache.org/lists.html#modules-dev they refer to a
searchable archive but when I click the link I get sent to
Thanks Jeff and Yann for your reviews. Fixed all items as suggested,
except for these ones:
The various calls to ssl_server_import_cert() in ssl_init_server_certs()
need different rc checking than before. (Now ssl_server_import_cert() can
return a fatal error instead of just a boolean.)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.chwrote:
Thanks Jeff and Yann for your reviews. Fixed all items as suggested,
except for these ones:
The various calls to ssl_server_import_cert() in ssl_init_server_certs()
need different rc checking than before. (Now
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:24:53 +0100
From: httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: ssl_die() and pool cleanup
Thanks Jeff and Yann for your reviews. Fixed all items as suggested,
except for these ones:
The various calls to
Hi
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send SNI
headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
for each https-request fro ab the target servers floods one line into log
[Sat Nov 23 14:00:33.592232 2013] [ssl:error] [pid 28314] AH02033: No
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
Haven't tried it but the README
http://git.mcs.anl.gov/radix/openpa.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/README
indicates only platform support based on gcc plus
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
Haven't tried it but the README
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Hi
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send SNI
headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
I suggest using bugzilla.
So, if the sanity check is skipped for the _default_ host, or there is a
better way to set the ServerName of the _default_ host, which I don't know
yet, then this wouldn't be affected.
I don't think any behavior should be based on _default_ vs. *.
Your scenario probably works the same with
(maybe sf already knows something about this)
[Thu Nov 21 16:20:17.035427 2013] [:emerg] [pid 1237:tid 47440161182336]
AH00017: Pre-configuration failed, exiting
Maybe main.c isn't a module, but it is probably best to put core there.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Hi
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send SNI
headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
for each https-request fro ab the target servers floods one line into
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 08:18:14 -0500
Subject: Re: ssl_die() and pool cleanup
From: cove...@gmail.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
So, if the sanity check is skipped for the _default_ host, or there is a
better way to set the ServerName of the _default_
Am 23.11.2013 14:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send SNI
headers?
On 23.11.2013 13:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Maybe I'm still missing something here, but it looks like we can still
survive some calls to ssl_die() this logic. (I guess it doesn't make sense
to have a configuration where that could happen, but it is confusing
looking at the code.) Look at the
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.chwrote:
On 23.11.2013 13:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Maybe I'm still missing something here, but it looks like we can still
survive some calls to ssl_die() this logic. (I guess it doesn't make
sense
to have a configuration
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2013 14:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab
Am 23.11.2013 15:44, schrieb Eric Covener:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 23.11.2013 14:22, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
is there something wrong with these patches or why
On 23.11.2013 15:03, Jeff Trawick wrote:
IMO it adds some future-proofing and self explanation to return early if
(rv != APR_SUCCESS rv != APR_NOTFOUND) instead of just checking for
equality with APR_EGENERAL.
Done with r1544812. Note that I'm working towards nukeing
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.chwrote:
On 23.11.2013 15:03, Jeff Trawick wrote:
IMO it adds some future-proofing and self explanation to return early if
(rv != APR_SUCCESS rv != APR_NOTFOUND) instead of just checking for
equality with APR_EGENERAL.
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send
SNI headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
Ask Meena perhaps? She's quite harmless
you missed what i asked - in fact why there are patches needed
why does ab -c 100 -n 50
I should also add that I see a pattern here, in case my response seems
disproportionate.
Am 23.11.2013 16:13, schrieb Eric Covener:
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not send SNI
headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
Ask Meena perhaps? She's quite harmless
you missed what i asked - in fact why there are patches needed
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 23.11.2013 16:13, schrieb Eric Covener:
is there something wrong with these patches or why does ab not
send SNI headers?
https://blogs.oracle.com/meena/entry/apachebench_ab_and_sni
Ask Meena perhaps? She's
Am 23.11.2013 16:48, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Am 23.11.2013 16:13, schrieb Eric Covener:
I don't think this list is appropriate for this issue.
then state it without cynicism and disrespect
Further, I
On 23.11.2013 14:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(maybe sf already knows something about this)
[Thu Nov 21 16:20:17.035427 2013] [:emerg] [pid 1237:tid 47440161182336]
AH00017: Pre-configuration failed, exiting
Maybe main.c isn't a module, but it is probably best to put core there.
Some other
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
By closing our write-end of the connection, we can signal to the server
that we can't efficiently forward their response to the client
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
By closing our write-end of the connection, we can signal to
On 22.11.2013 18:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With +1 votes from
jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond and h.reindl
and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
result of Releasing 2.4.7 as GA.
Jim I just now found out that the atomics problem for event also happens
Agreed.
On Nov 23, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.11.2013 18:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With +1 votes from
jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond and h.reindl
and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
result of Releasing 2.4.7
What I've done is changed trunk to simply warn, but not
block startup... ideally, we should either fix atomics
(which is more an APR issue, of course) or fix Event.
for those on APR: The httpd Event mpm uses atomics as signed
ints, not unsigned, and for a long time trunk had a startup
check which
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
l rarely try trunk except on
* Windows, which uses a system mechanism regardless of
Am Samstag, 23. November 2013, 18:00:40 schrieb Rainer Jung:
On 23.11.2013 14:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(maybe sf already knows something about this)
[Thu Nov 21 16:20:17.035427 2013] [:emerg] [pid 1237:tid
47440161182336] AH00017: Pre-configuration failed, exiting
Maybe main.c isn't
Couldn't ap_queue_info_try_get_idler() and the event_pre_config() check use
:
prev_idlers = apr_atomic_add32((apr_uint32_t *)(queue_info-idlers),
-1);
like ap_queue_info_wait_for_idler() does ?
Or maybe queue_info-idlers be declared uint32_t and negatives computed
relative to 2^31 ?
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
l rarely try
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64 (32-bit and 64-bit builds) soon. But Sun Studio on
SPARC presumably uses different explicit code in APR and I don't have access
to that.
I will try to get that one up and running on 2.4.7.
No
37 matches
Mail list logo
