As with my comments to Jim on OS/X compatibility, is a new vote for a
previously approved commit even necessary? Unless this commit was not
profered for the backport wasn't originally offered, it seems you can
simply commit to right the backport submitted.
On Oct 12, 2017 14:30, "Yann Ylavic"
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
> >> On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote:
> >>
>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote:
>>
>>
>> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
>> URL:
>>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote:
>
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
> URL:
>
On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/
modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c?rev=1808855=1808854=1808855=diff
Hi all,
The manual for mod_dav_fs is completely silent on the topic of webdav metadata
on the filesystem:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_dav_fs.html
Is the querying and setting of arbitrary filesystem metadata (xattr) supported
in mod_dav_fs?
If not, is anyone aware of an
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:24
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: backport patches
>
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> >
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
> wrote:
>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12
>> An: httpd-dev
>> Betreff: Re:
On 12 Oct 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. I hope
> it's not picked up in a source distribution.
>
> If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all over the
> world
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12
> An: httpd-dev
> Betreff: Re: backport patches
>
> > FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch.
> > I hope it's
> FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch.
> I hope it's not picked up in a source distribution.
Maybe we could have branches/2.4.x-patches instead?
>
> If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all
> over the world in not-secure http: locations -
FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. I hope
it's not picked up in a source distribution.
If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all over the world
in not-secure http: locations - it should give us tracking and easier use, I
hope. I am not
12 matches
Mail list logo