Re: svn commit: r1808855 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/http2/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.

2017-10-12 Thread William A Rowe Jr
As with my comments to Jim on OS/X compatibility, is a new vote for a previously approved commit even necessary? Unless this commit was not profered for the backport wasn't originally offered, it seems you can simply commit to right the backport submitted. On Oct 12, 2017 14:30, "Yann Ylavic"

Re: svn commit: r1808855 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/http2/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.

2017-10-12 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote: > >> >

Re: svn commit: r1808855 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/http2/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.

2017-10-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote: >> >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c >> URL: >>

Re: svn commit: r1808855 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/http2/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.

2017-10-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:42 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote: > > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c > URL: >

Re: svn commit: r1808855 [2/2] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS docs/manual/ docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml modules/http2/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.

2017-10-12 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Sep 19, 2017 05:17, wrote: Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c?rev=1808855=1808854=1808855=diff

mod_dav and PROPFIND/PROPPATCH

2017-10-12 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, The manual for mod_dav_fs is completely silent on the topic of webdav metadata on the filesystem: https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_dav_fs.html Is the querying and setting of arbitrary filesystem metadata (xattr) supported in mod_dav_fs? If not, is anyone aware of an

AW: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
+1 Regards Rüdiger > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:24 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > >

Re: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group > wrote: > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >> Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12 >> An: httpd-dev >> Betreff: Re:

Re: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Graham Leggett
On 12 Oct 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. I hope > it's not picked up in a source distribution. > > If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all over the > world

AW: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 13:12 > An: httpd-dev > Betreff: Re: backport patches > > > FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. > > I hope it's

Re: backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
> FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. > I hope it's not picked up in a source distribution. Maybe we could have branches/2.4.x-patches instead? > > If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all > over the world in not-secure http: locations -

backport patches

2017-10-12 Thread Stefan Eissing
FYI: I just checked in a "patches" directory inside the 2.4.x branch. I hope it's not picked up in a source distribution. If we keep patches for backports/hot-fixes here - instead of all over the world in not-secure http: locations - it should give us tracking and easier use, I hope. I am not