On 4/25/23 7:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:52:18 2023
> New Revision: 1909411
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909411=rev
> Log:
> *) mod_autht_jwt: New module to handle RFC 7519 JWT tokens within
> bearer tokens, both as part of the
> On May 4, 2023, at 4:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via Git at
On 5/4/23 11:31, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:54 PM jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 4/24/23 18:25, Steffen wrote:
There is a howto Building Apache and dependencies using CMake at
https://www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?t=8609
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 3:19 AM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > Everybody says git is decentralized, so why are you even asking this
> > question? Can't you just use any git repository, anywhere? ;-)
>
> Github is microsoft and you can bet they will break things. It is only a
> matter of time with
On 4/25/23 7:35 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:35:08 2023
> New Revision: 1909409
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909409=rev
> Log:
> core: Add the token_checker hook, that allows authentication to take
> place using mechanisms other than
Everybody says git is decentralized, so why are you even asking this
question? Can't you just use any git repository, anywhere? ;-)
Github is microsoft and you can bet they will break things. It is only a
matter of time with them.
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
Four decades in
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 2:12 AM Dennis Clarke wrote:
>...
> Why the assumption of Microsoft github? There is no reason to
> migrate to a git service such as Microsoft github when sourcehut works
> just fine as does a private git repo provided by Apache FSF itself.
>
Because the Apache
On 5/5/23 02:15, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via svn.apache.org. It
will be
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via Git at
>
On 5/5/23 2:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Down-thread, Giovanni asks about security patch handling. We can continue to
> use repos/private/pmc/httpd/ for that. That area will
> not go away. If people want to go "all git", then Infra can provide projects
> with a single, private repository that
10 matches
Mail list logo
