> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30
>
> Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up
> that a T will actually be happening... Yeah, you
Ah, I see. I created a script that does the tagging based on the directions
here.
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html
It was unclear in those instructions that one should commit the change to
AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN.
Instead I did the following:
...
#Set AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.30:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a
On 2016-05-12 16:33, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :)
Yup! You got mine.
Side question that popped into my mind as I was reviewing the code...
Would it make sense to have a "transitional" status for the time between
0 failures and when hcfails threshold
