or trunk, as since 2.4 there is a
"prefork_child_bucket" concept, which I don't fully understand its role (and
how it relate to other MPMs).
I'll be happy to write an updated patch if someone could explain me the role of
the "prefork_child_bucket".
Regards,
Yehezkel
Any chance someone could take a short look and provide me a feedback (of any
kind)?
I know your focus is on 2.4 and trunk, but there are still many 2.2 servers out
there...
Patch attached again for you convenience
Yehezkel Horowitz
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
From: Yehezkel
ber == 0" might be busy in a given time. But this
sounds to me like a fair limitation.
Note: flock give me the best results, still it seems to be with n^2 complexity
(where 'n' is the number of waiting processes), so reducing the number of
processes waiting on each mutex give exponential improveme
You should look for 'core_map_to_storage' and 'ap_core_translate' in
server/core.c
Yehezkel Horowitz
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
From: t...@eng.ucsd.edu [mailto:t...@eng.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Tianyin Xu
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:15 AM
directory of Apache source.
Can anyone reference me to such existing frame-work?
Thanks in advanced
Yehezkel Horowitz
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
recommends not using the
early mode in an operational server.
Thanks
Yehezkel Horowitz
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Hi Everyone
I didn't have any reply to the new features I have made to mod_substitute.
If any of you use this module, you might find those features helpful.
Regards,
Yehezkel
From: Yehezkel Horowitz [mailto:horow...@checkpoint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011
I think it is only problem with content filters (as mod_deflate filter), not
with request filters.
Regards
Yehezkel
-Original Message-
From: Ruediger Pluem [mailto:rpl...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:09 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1103315 -
I have noticed that sort_hook function (in apr_hooks.c) doesn't destroy
temporary pool.
This leads to a memory consumption of ~500K (=68 hooks * 8K) per PROCESS!
Since the sorted hooks are memcpy'ed to another pool anyway, no one needs this
pool after the function return.
So the
Changes include:
1. Support for SubstituteCond - ability to apply substitute rule only if the
configured conditions are met.
The conditions input could be compared to request data, environment
variables and internal Apache notes.
-- This section is similiar to RewriteCond, and I think it
process at sort_hook
function
On 24 May 2011, at 2:20 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
I have noticed that sort_hook function (in apr_hooks.c) doesn't destroy
temporary pool.
This leads to a memory consumption of ~500K (=68 hooks * 8K) per PROCESS!
Since the sorted hooks are memcpy'ed
terminated strings)
On 19 May 2011, at 1:06 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
Can anyone explain why ap_regexec can take only NULL terminated string?
I'm working in filter context and want to run regular expression on bucket
content (so I have the buffer length).
Currently I had to copy the bucket content
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: ap_regexec API for buffers (not NULL terminated strings)
On 19 May 2011, at 1:24 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
I have a patch (based on 2.2.17) to where should I submit it?
Add it to bugzilla so it doesn't get lost, and then ping here, so someone can
pick it up.
Ideally
2011, at 1:06 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
Can anyone explain why ap_regexec can take only NULL terminated string?
Presumably because that's what PCRE supports!
Sounds like a sensible thing to have.
Indeed, I could certainly use it. But surely this should be an enhancement
request for PCRE
14 matches
Mail list logo
