httpd 2.4.14 as GA
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff
> On Jun 14, 2015, at 8:37 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2015 12:45 PM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> >
> > I am canceling this vote... The breakage due to the chunked
> > stuff is the reason.
> >
> > THIS is the reason I don't like "last-minute" changes that
> > (1) touch a LOT of cod
On Jun 14, 2015 12:45 PM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
>
> I am canceling this vote... The breakage due to the chunked
> stuff is the reason.
>
> THIS is the reason I don't like "last-minute" changes that
> (1) touch a LOT of code or a major code path and (2) has an
> extremely limited QA history. We sh
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> We should also patch the test
>> framework to test for this.
>
> It seems that I can't commit on ^/httpd/test/framework, test patch attached...
Applied in r1685463 (with more chunk-siz
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> We should also patch the test
> framework to test for this.
It seems that I can't commit on ^/httpd/test/framework, test patch attached...
framework-chunk_trailing_spaces.patch
Description: application/download
I am canceling this vote... The breakage due to the chunked
stuff is the reason.
THIS is the reason I don't like "last-minute" changes that
(1) touch a LOT of code or a major code path and (2) has an
extremely limited QA history. We should also patch the test
framework to test for this.
Let's pat
Am 14.06.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Rainer Jung:
[X] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Not an easy call.
-1 but even more thanks for RMing.
Negative vote due to:
- chance of breaking chunked encoding due to spec intolerance.
s/spec/space/ - Sorry.
Proxy example reported by Steffen plus
Am 11.06.2015 um 16:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[X] -1: Danger Will Rob
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:09 AM, olli hauer wrote:
> On 2015-06-14 02:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic
>>> wrote:
>
> I did not lo
On 2015-06-14 02:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic
>> wrote:
I did not look at pr12355.t and pr43738.t yet, however those passed in
>>
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Yann Ylavic
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Trawick
>> >> wr
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I did not look at pr12355.t and pr43738.t yet, however those passed in
> >> my tests, so it's probably something differe
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Yann Ylavic
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Trawick
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Those that know the original patch would presumabl
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> >
>> > Those that know the original patch would presumably have a better way to
>> > code this.
>> >
>> > I recall that httpd 1
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > Those that know the original patch would presumably have a better way to
> > code this.
> >
> > I recall that httpd 1.3 generally added whitespace after the chunk size
> as
> > an o
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Those that know the original patch would presumably have a better way to
> code this.
>
> I recall that httpd 1.3 generally added whitespace after the chunk size as
> an optimization (pre-allocating space in BUFF for the largest possible chu
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> I did not look at pr12355.t and pr43738.t yet, however those passed in
>> my tests, so it's probably something different.
>
>
> Just in case it wasn't clear, these aren't regressions.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rainer Jung
> wrote:
> >
> > any chance you can reproduce the problem with a slightly patched 2.4.14
> to
> > get additional log output around the suspect code?
> >
> > The patch would be
> >
> > Index: module
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> any chance you can reproduce the problem with a slightly patched 2.4.14 to
> get additional log output around the suspect code?
>
> The patch would be
>
> Index: modules/http/http_filters.c
> ==
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
>> at the usual place:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these
at Jun 13 15:20:54.616551 2015] [proxy:debug] [pid 4676:tid 1152]
>>> proxy_util.c(2782): AH02824: HTTP: connection established with
>>> 127.0.0.1:81 (127.0.0.1)
>>> [Sat Jun 13 15:20:54.616551 2015] [proxy:debug] [pid 4676:tid 1152]
>>> proxy_util.c(2936): AH0
, June 13, 2015 8:16 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: * Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
When I disable compression in Sambar then it is fine, like with 2.4.13 and
below.
-Original Message-
From: Steffen
Sent: Saturday, June
When I disable compression in Sambar then it is fine, like with 2.4.13 and
below.
-Original Message-
From: Steffen
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 7:35 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: * Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
ent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:14 PM
*Newsgroups:* gmane.comp.apache.devel
*To:* Apache HTTP Server Development List
<mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Steffen mailto:i...@apachelounge.com>> wrote:
ent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 3:14 PM
*Newsgroups:* gmane.comp.apache.devel
*To:* Apache HTTP Server Development List <mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>
*Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Steffen mailto:i...@apachelounge.com>> wrote:
Test
fen wrote:
>
>> Tested with 2.4.13 tarball, then no error.
>>
>
> Wow...
>
> Is anything written to the error log when you try proxy to the Sambar
> server? If my guess about the related code is correct, you'll need
> LogLevel Info (or debug or trace) to see
PM
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Steffen wrote:
Tested with 2.4.13 tarball, then no error.
Wow...
Is anything written to the error log when you try proxy
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
see all the relevant messages.
>
> -Original Message- From: Steffen
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1:33 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
>
>
> Regression: All works fine except
Tested with 2.4.13 tarball, then no error.
-Original Message-
From: Steffen
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 1:33 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
Regression: All works fine except a Proxy Pass to
] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
No regression with event and worker, included apr-1.5.2 and apr-util-1.5.4.
Tested systems:
* Debian 8 - amd64
* Debian 7 - amd64
* Debian 6 - amd64
* Debian 6 - amd64 - mixed 32/64bit system/kernel:
Thanks Jim,
Yann.
> On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
> at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
Go for re
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>>>
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>>
>>> Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
>>> Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
>
>> Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
>> Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
>> File length: 57106 byte(s)
>> Diff to previous 1
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> It doesn't make sense for us to hold up a release when that change has
>>> been in the last several releases however. (That's a high barrier for
>>> making progress.)
>>>
>>>
> There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 compon
Am 12.06.2015 um 19:12 schrieb William A Rowe Jr:
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
File length: 57106 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1674655 (colored)
Merge r1676085 from trunk:
consistently output SSL
Revision 1678233 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Modified Thu May 7 16:26:43 2015 UTC (5 weeks, 1 day ago) by jim
File length: 57106 byte(s)
Diff to previous 1674655 (colored)
Merge r1676085 from trunk:
consistently output SSLCertificateChainFile deprecation warnings
Submitted
Am 12.06.2015 um 18:48 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
mailto:jacob.perk...@cpanel.net>> wrote:
+1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4
with our control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us
to have to cha
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the response. You’re right, this does look to be in Apache 2.2.12
at this time. I was taking this from CHANGES, and it states:
Changes with Apache 2.4.13
*) mod_ssl: make sure to consistently output SSLCertificateChainFile
deprecation warnings, when encountered in a
>
> It doesn't make sense for us to hold up a release when that change has
>> been in the last several releases however. (That's a high barrier for
>> making progress.)
>>
>>
There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 component. Did the
2.4.13 fix make it more frequent.
(fixing my t
There seems to be a 2.4.8 component and an actual 2.4.13 component. Did the
2.4.13 fix make it more frequent?
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:49 PM Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 w
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jacob Perkins
wrote:
> +1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 with
> our control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us to have to
> change our product instead of doing a regular Apache release.
>
> When you have a server
+1 to Noels comments. We have a ton of servers running Apache 2.4 with our
control panel. Doing this in a point release will cause us to have to change
our product instead of doing a regular Apache release.
When you have a server with 10k+ SSL vhosts, this can cause massive, unexpected
proble
On 12/06/2015 00:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
-1
"The SSLCertificateChainFile directive () is deprecated,
SSLCertificateFile should be used instead"
This is corrected in SVN, see
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/request.c?view=log
Unsure why this edit didn't carry on to the github mirror.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Rainer Canavan <
rainer.cana...@sevenval.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is the commit message incorrect or t
Hi,
is the commit message incorrect or the CHANGES file concerning CVE-2015-3183?
The commit message at
https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/cd2b7a26c776b0754fb98426a67804fd48118708
uses CVE-2015-3183 for the "Replacement of ap_some_auth_required",
while the CHANGES uses it for "Remove apr_brig
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.14 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.14 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the normal 72 hr
49 matches
Mail list logo
