Thanks.
Now forwarded to users@. Hopefully anyone on dev@ read your vote results
post.
On Oct 8, 2017 10:31, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.10.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> Hrm... looks like it was already announced? At least the
>> website sez it was, and it looks like an Emai
Am 08.10.2017 um 15:22 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Hrm... looks like it was already announced? At least the
website sez it was, and it looks like an Email was
sent to announce@a.o but I'm not seeing anything on
the httpd lists
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:[Announceme
Hrm... looks like it was already announced? At least the
website sez it was, and it looks like an Email was
sent to announce@a.o but I'm not seeing anything on
the httpd lists.
FYI: I'll be announcing tomorrow
Sorry I ran out of cycles to jump on this on the 4th, and didn't see anyone
step up,
so I went ahead and still pushed it out a day late/day early this
afternoon. Hope you
had a worthwhile conference. Please help me double check any errors or
omissions,
I think it was already staged correctly.
You'
Sure. Anyone who wants to announce, please do so!! :)
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, and no
>> vetos, I call this vote CLOSED with the result that
>> the vote p
> Am 02.10.2017 um 19:53 schrieb William A Rowe Jr :
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Eissing
> wrote:
>> Update: disregard the man behind the curtain - for now.
>>
>> I have the strangest effects on my main machine under native macOS 10.12.6,
>> which
>> do not happen on my paralle
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, and no
> vetos, I call this vote CLOSED with the result that
> the vote passes.
>
> I will start moving the artifacts for mirror sync and
> let's plan on announcing on Friday.
Uhm, why?
I und
With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, and no
vetos, I call this vote CLOSED with the result that
the vote passes.
I will start moving the artifacts for mirror sync and
let's plan on announcing on Friday.
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test ta
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Eissing
wrote:
> Update: disregard the man behind the curtain - for now.
>
> I have the strangest effects on my main machine under native macOS 10.12.6,
> which
> do not happen on my parallels ubuntu image and my laptop with macOS 10.13.0.
> I tested
> wit
Leaving it open for another ~24 hours... I don't want
to go thru the process of "releasing" it if someone is
going to gripe after the fact.
FWIW: I'll be at Grace Hopper the rest of the week so
my online time will be sporadic.
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 4:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Can we discu
On 2017-10-01 18:08, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Since I can only observe it with prefork in combination with http2 which
> is not a good combination in any way, I am not too concerned. Still it
> could be useful to understand whats going on.
How can this even be? http2 is automatically deactivated when
I observe sporadic failures in the proxy tests for 2.4.x.
They only happen on Solaris (Sparc) and only for prefork MPM. Although
they are not strictly reproducible, I think they only happen with APR
1.6 an with mod_http2/mod_proxy_http2 loaded (although they do not
happen during their test cases).
Can we discuss this on a sep thread. The question now is really
whether 2.4.28 is DOA or not.
I'm not seeing any -1s... nor have I seen any more info related
to the assert bug (but I admit I may have missed that)
the field (and have answered with a 301 to the CHANGES file).
--
Daniel Ruggeri
Original Message
From: Eric Covener
Sent: September 29, 2017 7:16:51 AM CDT
To: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM
Am 29.09.2017 um 14:16 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
release is 2.4.16
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
>>
>> On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
>>> release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Looks perfectly sensible to me
in your world where you know the ba
On 29 Sep 2017, at 12:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> it's not about cheap - it's just questionable that after 2.4.12 the next
> release is 2.4.16 because it looks not really sane
Looks perfectly sensible to me.
Regards,
Graham
—
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Am 29.09.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Graham Leggett:
On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of
the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts
over (I think the max was a 3 or 4 patch leve
On 28 Sep 2017, at 7:10 PM, Helmut K. C. Tessarek wrote:
> I have a question. Why are you tagging a release and do testing? Most of
> the time a problem is found and a new release is tagged and it starts
> over (I think the max was a 3 or 4 patch level jump).
>
> Why not tagging an RC? People te
An update concerning the sporadic proxy test failures for prefork on
Solaris that I observed:
These are a bit difficult to nail down, because running only the proxy
tests does not fail. One has to run a relatively big part of the test
suite to have a chance of triggering the problem during the
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steffen wrote:
> On Windows it does not build out of the box.
>
> Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in
> mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake.
Seems baffling, but it is pretty straightforward in hindsight.
libhttpd
On 2017-09-28 09:51, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Personally, I don't think the age or heritage of the build-logic is the issue,
> but rather a lack of people *really* testing 2.4.x until a release is tagged.
> It's for that reason that I tend to pre-announce a T&R well in advance of
> actually
> DOING
If the issue is "real" and a patch is forthcoming, I agree that we
mark 2.4.28 as DOA and proceed w/ 2.4.29 next week. I am comfortable keeping
the VOTE open longer that the normal/required 72hours to be sure one way
or another.
Personally, I don't think the age or heritage of the build-logic is t
Am 25.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger
Update: disregard the man behind the curtain - for now.
I have the strangest effects on my main machine under native macOS 10.12.6,
which
do not happen on my parallels ubuntu image and my laptop with macOS 10.13.0. I
tested
with hyperthreading disabled to exclude the Intel *lake bugs, but it mad
Analyzing...
my checkout of branch/2.4.x does not show this.
my buildt of 2.4.28 with -deps as provided, does after while of letting:
while true; do h2load -t 8 -c 100 -n 1 -m 5 -d gen/data-10k
http://test.example.org:12345/; done
run (data-10k is a 10k text file). The whole server setup is
+1 to doing a 2.4.29 next week with these issues fixed.
On 9/27/2017 9:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The assert() has me concerned, and Steffen's report is problematic. He has
a vote but hasn't cast it. At this moment I'm -0 and would spin a 2.4.29
next week to address these issues, unless you
The assert() has me concerned, and Steffen's report is problematic. He has
a vote but hasn't cast it. At this moment I'm -0 and would spin a 2.4.29
next week to address these issues, unless you decide to respin before this
release, yourself.
Nothing I've changed today altered the httpd tarball sig
fdqueue.c, line 390, assertion "!((queue)->nelts == (queue)->bounds)" failed
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Luca Toscano wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> 2017-09-27 17:32 GMT+02:00 Stefan Eissing :
> On my h2 load tests, the server sometimes crashes in an assertion failure
> (build in maintainer mod
Hi Stefan,
2017-09-27 17:32 GMT+02:00 Stefan Eissing :
> On my h2 load tests, the server sometimes crashes in an assertion failure
> (build in maintainer mode):
>
How did you make the tests? It would be good for people to attempt to
reproduce..
>
> macOS crash reporter:
> Thread 54 Crashed:
>
On my h2 load tests, the server sometimes crashes in an assertion failure
(build in maintainer mode):
macOS crash reporter:
Thread 54 Crashed:
0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x7fffd3c34d42 __pthread_kill + 10
1 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x7fffd3d22457 pthread_kill + 9
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 7:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [
Hi Jim,
2017-09-25 14:13 GMT+02:00 Jim Jagielski :
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0:
On 25/09/2017 22:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
>
[X] +1: Good to go
Tested on Debian(s) 7.11, 8.9, 9.1 (with http2): all PASS.
Note: spurious warning in ap_parse_form_data(): "'escaped_char[0]' may
be used uninitialized
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
+1 AIX
> Am 26.09.2017 um 11:40 schrieb Steffen :
>
> @Stefan : Any reason that we do not have mod_http2 1.10.11 with 2.4.28 ?
The change did not address the reported issue. It will probably be reverted
in github and never see Apache subversion.
>
> On Tuesday 26/09/2017 at 10:00, Stefan Eissing wr
@Stefan : Any reason that we do not have mod_http2 1.10.11 with
2.4.28 ?
On Tuesday 26/09/2017 at 10:00, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hmm. Sad.
Am 25.09.2017 um 19:11 schrieb Steffen :
On Windows it does not build out of the box.
Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in
mod_proxy
Hmm. Sad.
> Am 25.09.2017 um 19:11 schrieb Steffen :
>
> On Windows it does not build out of the box.
>
> Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in
> mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake.
>
> Steffen
>
> On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski
On Windows it does not build out of the box.
Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in
mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked
cmake.
Steffen
On Monday 25/09/2017 at 14:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
Vote will last the norm
43 matches
Mail list logo
