Re: Bug #31228

2004-12-04 Thread Garrett Rooney
Geoffrey Young wrote: So, uhh, ping? Any comments other than i'm iffy and is there any reason not to add it? +1 (concept; implementation not verified) here too. is this the most recent patch: http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746 ? if so, I'll try and review the

Re: Bug #31228

2004-11-23 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:37:43 -0500, Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone please take a look at bug

Re: Bug #31228

2004-11-23 Thread Geoffrey Young
So, uhh, ping? Any comments other than i'm iffy and is there any reason not to add it? +1 (concept; implementation not verified) here too. is this the most recent patch: http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746 ? if so, I'll try and review the implementation early

Re: Bug #31228

2004-11-23 Thread Garrett Rooney
Geoffrey Young wrote: So, uhh, ping? Any comments other than i'm iffy and is there any reason not to add it? +1 (concept; implementation not verified) here too. is this the most recent patch: http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12746 ? if so, I'll try and review the

Re: Bug #31228

2004-11-22 Thread Garrett Rooney
Geoffrey Young wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla? It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229. I'm

Re: Bug #31228

2004-09-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
Garrett Rooney wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla? It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229. I'm working

Re: Bug #31228

2004-09-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla? It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229. I'm working on a module that implements a type of rfc3229 delta encoding

Re: Bug #31228

2004-09-18 Thread Garrett Rooney
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla? It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229. I'm working on a module that implements a type