t;
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Jean-Jacques Clar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:38 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: memory leak in apr_buck_alloc...
>>
>>
>>I am using WebBench to run my
> Bill
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Jean-Jacques Clar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:38 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: memory leak in apr_buck_alloc...
>>
>>
>>I am using WebB
operators are not implemented properly on Netware, then all
kinds
of bad things might happen...
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Jacques Clar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: memory leak in a
Yes, and No:
Test #1- 1 client, 1 small file (GIF 223 b.), the rate is around 60
req/sec
tested for about half an hour and APR memory stay stable.
Test #2- 1 client, 1 big file (EX, 541Kb), the rate is around 20
req/sec
tested for about 20 min and APR increase by around 8 MB/min.
I think I wil
kinds
of bad things might happen...
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Jacques Clar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: memory leak in apr_buck_alloc...
>
>
> I am using WebBench to run my
Do you see the leak when repeatedly requesting one file with one client?
Bill
> I am using WebBench to run my test.
> Request are not using keep alive.
> There are a wide range of files (.ex, .html and .gif and 404s)
> It leaks, whatever if I am requesting only few files or the whole 6000+
> se
I am using WebBench to run my test.
Request are not using keep alive.
There are a wide range of files (.ex, .html and .gif and 404s)
It leaks, whatever if I am requesting only few files or the whole 6000+
set of files.
The leak depend on the number of clients I am using, with 40 clients
and a
ref
Which values are you using for MaxRequestsPerChild .
If mine is different than 0, then nice, I don't see a leak because
each of my Threads are kill once in a while.
But if it is = 0, then it leaks when refreshing entries in the cache,
could it be the fact in NetWare we have one process and mu
> I tried to recreate this problem, but no luck so far...
Same here. I was able to see an EOS bucket leak in 2.0.40 that is fixed in
the latest tag.
Bill
I tried to recreate this problem, but no luck so far...
is there any particular type of request that I need to
use to trigger the memory leak? I just ran a few hundred
thousand requests for the same 1KB file through 2.0.41-pre2
with the mod_mem_cache settings below, and I can't see
any sign of me
Anyone with some kind of architecture diagrams related to the
memory management in APR?
Thanks,
Jean-Jacques Clar
I guess my leak is from a different source.
Refreshing files in mod_mem_cache drive up the allocated memory in
aprlib.
It is consistent and has been there since I started using mod_cache
(3-4 months ago).
Justin,
Were you using caching modules when you were able to reproduce/fix
Brad's leak?
Wha
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 September 2002 22:23
>> [Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
>> I think max_index is misunderstood. allocator->max_index is the index of
>> the biggest block available. index = block_size / boundary_size - 1, where
>> boundary_size is
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 02:41:33PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed
> that
Yeah, my recent commit to core_output_filter seems to have fixed
this for me.
We re
> [Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
>
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >
> > > Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> > > than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less
[Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> > Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> > than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have
I think I have been seeing the same thing for a long time when
refreshing entries
in mod_mem_cache. If you find something in the alloc path I
will be
more than happy to try it in my lab.
"Jean-Jacques Clar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/21/2002 06:23:58
PMTo: W G
Stoddard/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> > Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> > than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed that
> > apr_bucket_all
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
> than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed that
> apr_bucket_alloc() calls allocator_alloc() which seems to continuously
> malloc() memory rather than findi
19 matches
Mail list logo
