Whoops, that was a typo. I am indeed using the 2.0.28 beta release. Sorry
for the confusion.
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:40 AM
To: Apache-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.18 as Win2k service
Any messages in the error log?
Bill
> Whoops, that was a typo. I am indeed using the 2.0.28 beta release. Sorry
> for the confusion.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:40 AM
> To: Apache-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nope, 0 bytes in the error log.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
Any messages in the error log?
Bill
TED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
>
>
> Any messages in the error log?
>
> Bill
>
> > Whoops, that was a typo. I am indeed using the 2.0.2
: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
> Whoops, that was a typo. I am indeed using the 2.0.28 beta rele
ser a member
of the Administrators group, it still doesn't work.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
bin\apache -k install -n Apache2
THEN;
apache -k start -n apache2
-OR-
net start Apache2
The Apache2 (default) may have tripped you up. Keeps it distinct from
1.3 generation apache services, but you can use the
t: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
Dave, win32 canonicalization requires list/read access to each directory
above Apache directories, to the root. It doesn't have to have access to
thei
t have permission to open a filehandle to
>the directory.
>
>Bill
>
>
>
>From: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:15 PM
>Subject: RE: pr
This is precisely the same as what I'm seeing, the only difference being
that I built from the 2.0.28 archive.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as
oblem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
This is precisely the same as what I'm seeing, the only difference being
that I built from the 2.0.28 archive.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTEC
using VC 6.0, using the InstallBin target in the
>IDE, using all the project files as they came from the zip archive.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:53 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: pro
No SSL in either.
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
Did you build with SSL support? Does the MSI file contain SSL support
From: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:10 AM
> FYI, I did my local build using VC 6.0, using the InstallBin target in the
> IDE, using all the project files as they came from the zip archive.
Dave, if you grab a recent PlatformSDK from Microsoft's site, and
einstalled VS6SP5, rebuilt from scratch again. Same problem.
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
F
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)
OK, I installed the August 2001 Platform SDK from the November MSDN issue
(if there's a later one, they haven't sent it, and the website is down).
Made sure to install the Visual Studio integration, etc. Wiped o
16 matches
Mail list logo