-Original Message-
From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
After you read the article, how could you possibly say that
it is spam?
Well, the page does try to load javascript content from 4 external
sites... Fortunately, my browser's NoScript extension blocks them all.
Why do
-Original Message-
From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Rich Bowen'; dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: 'Apache Infrastructure'
Subject: RE: [Issue] External links @ the wiki, aka pagechange wars
Hello,
I've never used
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision.
[ ] Our httpd wiki
Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision.
[XXX] Our httpd wiki is
Hi,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour
cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime
asked
Joshua Slive wrote:
On 5/24/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 04:23, Tony Stevenson wrote:
AskApache has had several email conversations with both myself, and
Rich. In which he was asked politely, but firmly to not use links
to content on his site.
NOTE: NOT
Hello,
I've never used this list so bear with me, I couldn't get docs-help to send
me help.Its nice to know Apache has so many helpful people willing to
discuss this situation, but why do I get the feeling that none of you have
actually read the page in question? Here is the link that is
The trouble in this particular case is that the contributor
in question writes articles that are misleading or completely
wrong, and appears to be unaware of the fact that he is being
misleading and wrong. I'm not sure if he's genuinely trying
to be helpful, or merely trying to inflate
On Thu, 24 May 2007 15:15:56 -0500
Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've never used this list so bear with me, I couldn't get docs-help
to send me help.Its nice to know Apache has so many helpful
people willing to discuss this situation, but why do I get the
feeling that
ons 2007-05-30 klockan 21:39 +0100 skrev Nick Kew:
It then proceeds to list HTTP status codes, and gives an errordocument
for each one. Unfortunately a number of them are bogus gibberish.
It's the gibberish Apache emits if you shoot yourself in the foot using
Redirect. Garbage in, garbage
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision.
[XX] Our httpd wiki is open to external
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision, and in the meantime asked that
the wiki become read-only for the conclusion of this decision.
[ ] Our httpd wiki is open to external resources
On 5/24/07, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a serious issue to determine, and I've asked for a 48 hour cooldown
of wiki.apache.org/httpd/ to make a decision,
On 5/24/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a Wiki isn't open to community input ( where community here means
*users*, not the typical Apache definition of community meaning the
*committers*), then what is it for?
The wiki is for community input. Not recognizing the difference
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:05:30AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
External links are encouraged where they add substantial value, but
you may not link to your own pages or otherwise seek private benefits
from external links.
I like the elegance of this rule, because if it's your page and you
On May 24, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:05:30AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
External links are encouraged where they add substantial value, but
you may not link to your own pages or otherwise seek private benefits
from external links.
I like the
On 5/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:05:30AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
External links are encouraged where they add substantial value, but
you may not link to your own pages or otherwise seek
On May 24, 2007, at 08:50, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:05:30AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
External links are encouraged where they add substantial value, but
you may not link to your own pages or otherwise seek private benefits
from external links.
I like the
On May 24, 2007, at 04:23, Tony Stevenson wrote:
AskApache has had several email conversations with both myself, and
Rich. In which he was asked politely, but firmly to not use links
to content on his site.
NOTE: NOT because external links are bad, but because the articles to
which
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:14:23AM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
NOTE: NOT because external links are bad, but because the articles to
which he was linking were misleading, incorrect, and promoted sub-
optimal solutions to common problems. The implied endorsement (The
Apache docs link to this
On 24/05/07, Mads Toftum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 - I don't think a single users abuse should force us into making a
catch all policy. Part of the price of running a wiki is that you'll
have to deal with abuse from time to time.
I also agree with all of Rich's sentiments, but I feel a
On 5/24/07, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 24, 2007, at 04:23, Tony Stevenson wrote:
AskApache has had several email conversations with both myself, and
Rich. In which he was asked politely, but firmly to not use links
to content on his site.
NOTE: NOT because external links
On 5/24/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache wiki is not some democratic exercise like wikipedia where
we need to treat everyone equally. We are a meritocracy, not a
democracy, even on the wiki. Certain people (like Rich) have earned
the right to make final decisions about what
On 5/24/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe one rule that states that {INSERT AUTHERIZED PEOPLE HERE} can
make a decision on a dispute. Example: some external link that provide
bad/false or not prefured information.
If that person/persons decide the link needs to go it should.
[for infra, who is bcc'ed - three * bullets below]
Joshua Slive wrote:
Although I respect Bill's desire to have this solved apache-wide, I
actually think that this case would have been better addressed in the
closer confines of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Let's just address this particular case
and
On 5/24/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[for infra, who is bcc'ed - three * bullets below]
* ask infra to reopen the wiki to general write access,
* aks infra to please revoke AskApache/their ip from the httpd wiki.
+1.
On 5/24/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/24/07, Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe one rule that states that {INSERT AUTHERIZED PEOPLE HERE} can
make a decision on a dispute. Example: some external link that provide
bad/false or not prefured information.
If
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:47:49PM -0500, Webmaster wrote:
Say whatever you want, I'm not going to argue when the evidence is online
for everyone to examine. Go look at the wiki at my posting history, you
will see how unfairly I have been treated.
I've done just that today, never having
29 matches
Mail list logo
