Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi All,
Sorry for the delay. Below is a draft version of the documentation on
ListenCoresBucketsRatio. Please chime in with your feedback and comments.
This is my first time to help on the documentation. Please let me know if this
is sufficient or I need
of them idle. You can increase the values
later if needed.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much for your help!
Yes, I
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: httpd
Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much for your help!
Yes, I think I can help to document the ListenCoresBucketsRatio, at least
to draft it. Also, I think I can share
: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 2:06 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: AW: Time for 2.4.11
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
There is still missing the ListenCoresBucketsRatio documentation,
and I don't think I can do
By the way, do you have an estimate on when is the 2.4.12?
I guess I will ping you back when the window opens for 2.4.12!
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:39 AM
To: httpd
Subject: RE: AW: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Yann,
Thanks very much
Thanks for this information and all the help! I will ping you back when 2.4.12
window opens :-)
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:52 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
I try to do
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net wrote:
I haven’t seen an update through Bugzilla, and I was wondering if this got
in for 2.4.11: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
This is long continuation lines broken and it is queued up for
Good morning Jim!
I haven’t seen an update through Bugzilla, and I was wondering if this got in
for 2.4.11: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
Thanks for your time!
—
Jacob Perkins
Product Owner
cPanel Inc.
Expect the TR around 3pm eastern.
Thanks for the confirmation and the changes link!
—
Jacob Perkins
Product Owner
cPanel Inc.
jacob.perk...@cpanel.net mailto:jacob.perk...@cpanel.net
Office: 713-529-0800 x 4046
Cell: 713-560-8655
On Jan 15, 2015, at 8:44 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at
-
Von: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:12
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
I just checked and found the most recent commits regarding to
SO_REUSEPORT patch work is done on Dec 4, 2014 with trunk version
1643179
: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:12
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
I just checked and found the most recent commits regarding to
SO_REUSEPORT patch work is done on Dec 4, 2014 with trunk version
1643179. There are also other commits done on this patch work as well
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
There is still missing the ListenCoresBucketsRatio documentation,
and I don't think I can do it today, could you?
Also, would you share maybe some recommended settings
({Min,Max}Spare*,ServerLimit, StartServer, ...) wrt
On 15/01/2015 20:06, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
There is still missing the ListenCoresBucketsRatio documentation, and I
don't think I can do it today, could you?
Also, would you share maybe some recommended settings
At this point, I think we are ready... the remaining
proposed backports lack sufficient votes to be folded in
and/or new enough, or large enough, to make inclusion at
this stage too risky.
For the next few hours, if you have time, test the heck out
of the 2.4 branch, since I'll TR it later on
, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 9:20 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
I just want to check what the status on the SO_REUSEPORT patch is. Do you see
any issues backport it? Please let me know.
Attached is the email I sent last week
if that works for you.
Thanks,
Yingqi Lu
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:07 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
I haven't had time to check... is there an actual 2.4 backport patch available,
or do I need
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
Get your backports into STATUS now, and test and vote on the existing (and
to-be-entered) proposals asap!
On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Okey dokey... the idea is a TR on Thurs with a release next Mon/Tues.
On Jan 8, 2015
is good enough. I can help
you find if you want.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:35 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
Thanks very much for your replies. I do not think
All of them are needed.
Regards
Rüdiger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2015 08:12
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
I just checked and found the most recent commits regarding
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:54 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
Get your backports into STATUS now, and test and vote on the existing (and
to-be-entered) proposals asap!
On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Okey dokey... the idea
Get your backports into STATUS now, and test and vote
on the existing (and to-be-entered) proposals asap!
On Jan 13, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Okey dokey... the idea is a TR on Thurs with a release
next Mon/Tues.
On Jan 8, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski
Okey dokey... the idea is a TR on Thurs with a release
next Mon/Tues.
On Jan 8, 2015, at 6:11 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Hi Jeff,
Am 10.01.2015 18:30, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info wrote:
Hi,
Am 08.01.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Can we please get another vote on this?
* core: Fix
Hi All,
I just want to ping again to see if there is any updates on this?
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 9:57 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Time for 2.4.11
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your email. I
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Micha Lenk mi...@lenk.info wrote:
Hi,
Am 08.01.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Can we please get another vote on this?
* core: Fix -D[efined] or Define[d] variables lifetime
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Martynas Bendorius
marty...@martynas.it wrote:
And what about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37564 ? :)
Not likely for the release on the horizon. A few people would need to
deep-dive into suexec to be able to change it responsibly.
AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.4.11
Let me look... how easy is the backport?
On Jan 8, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lu, Yingqi yingqi...@intel.com wrote:
Hi All,
Can we make the SO_REUSEPORT support into this new stable version? The
first version of the patch was trunked last
And what about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37564 ? :)
Best regards,
Martynas Bendorius
On 1/9/15 4:45 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11
Hi,
Am 08.01.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Can we please get another vote on this?
* core: Fix -D[efined] or Define[d] variables lifetime
accross restarts. PR 57328.
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1643825
Thx. Will do.
On Jan 8, 2015, at 7:06 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's:
-
to go.
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:12 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Time for 2.4.11
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me warm :)
Good morning!
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
This is causing us some headaches with our mod_security rollouts.
Thanks!
—
Jacob Perkins
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55910
This is causing us some headaches with our mod_security rollouts.
This one is
Testing this out as we speak...
On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:45 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jacob Perkins jacob.perk...@cpanel.net
wrote:
Any chance we could get this back ported into 2.4 for the 2.4.11 release?
On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's:
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824
contains a corrected fix (use correct '[[1234]].*' instead single '[1234].*'
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me
warm :)
[mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 3:12 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Time for 2.4.11
Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me warm :)
38 matches
Mail list logo
