Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Stefan wrote: /Code request for a Windows Service restart call: 0/ I started some time ago a discussion at: https://github.com/icing/mod_md/issues/17 There I want it as an option for Windows. The discussion resulted in the MDNotifyCmd which makes me very happy, a script can now do the job

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

> On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Steffen wrote: > > > A cause for minimal participation can be that dev is going with git. > > Mentioned Issues and Requests are at https://github.com/icing/mod_md/issues > and not at a httpd

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On 12/11/2017 05:08 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: There are important questions on how we progress the design of the server. I have asked for participation and feedback on the design of ACME support in httpd since April. Shoulder clapping, "go ahead!", "fine!". Answers to design questions: not

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On Dec 11, 2017 08:55, "Stefan Eissing" . Documentation update is still outstanding, but I assume merging those in is not really a voting issue. Docs are CTR. Might be an issue for some to introduce undocumented changes in the maintenance branch, but is easily remedied.

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

The following change has been made to trunk: - mod_md v1.1.0 with renamed configuration directives: "ManagedDomain" -> "MDomain" " "

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

A cause for minimal participation can be that dev is going with git. Mentioned Issues and Requests are at https://github.com/icing/mod_md/issues and not at a httpd list. The renaming discussion was one of the mod_md sporadic posts on the dev list at a late moment. Do not feel kidding, I

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

I am a SUPER +1 on the design, architecture, etc... As far as the naming, it seems like a bikeshed to me... JFDI ;) > On Dec 11, 2017, at 5:08 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > >> Am 08.12.2017 um 19:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : >> >> On

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Hi Stefan, 2017-12-11 11:08 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > > > Am 08.12.2017 um 19:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Luca Toscano > wrote: > >> Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

> Am 11.12.2017 um 11:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing : > > >> Am 08.12.2017 um 19:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : >> >> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: >>> Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

> Am 08.12.2017 um 19:35 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: >> Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to use >> for SSLPolicy? > > Just an observation, >

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: > Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to use > for SSLPolicy? Just an observation, http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/quickreference.html illustrated that we have no verbs in directive block titles, thus

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Restarting from this proposal to make a summary: 2017-12-04 14:16 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep > ' > I propose the following changes: > > 1. The simple, single line

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

My 2c :) 2017-12-07 16:32 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener : > > Perhaps a more schematic view will clear things up > > > > mod_md: generates certfiicates for domains > > mod_ssl: Load certificates for domains. If mod_md is present and > > manages a domain, mod_ssl is supposed to use

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

probably I don't stumble into #httpd enough :P . I'm ezra-s there btw. 2017-12-07 16:32 GMT+01:00 Eric Covener : >> Perhaps a more schematic view will clear things up >> >> mod_md: generates certfiicates for domains >> mod_ssl: Load certificates for domains. If mod_md is

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

> Perhaps a more schematic view will clear things up > > mod_md: generates certfiicates for domains > mod_ssl: Load certificates for domains. If mod_md is present and > manages a domain, mod_ssl is supposed to use mod_md ones instead of > those manually given through file paths. Think about

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Steffen wrote: > I find the word Managed in ManagedDomain and MD in the other settings already > confusing, are not easy recognized. > > In fact lots of settings are managing domain(s). > > What does mod_md manage ? > > For me mod_md manages

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

2017-12-07 14:34 GMT+01:00 Steffen : > I find the word Managed in ManagedDomain and MD in the other settings already > confusing, are not easy recognized. > > In fact lots of settings are managing domain(s). > > What does mod_md manage ? A basic understanding or reading of

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

I find the word Managed in ManagedDomain and MD in the other settings already confusing, are not easy recognized. In fact lots of settings are managing domain(s). What does mod_md manage ? For me mod_md manages in the area of SSL(certificates automation). To be more easy to recognize, I

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On 12/05/2017 10:48 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Ok, so that something good comes out of all this: Rich just promised to sing at the next ApacheCon, right Rich? If I did, I must have had too much scotch ... "Keys", by ManagedDomainFormerlyCalledYouKnowWhat: "You don't conf certificates

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Ok, so that something good comes out of all this: Rich just promised to sing at the next ApacheCon, right Rich? "Keys", by ManagedDomainFormerlyCalledYouKnowWhat: "You don't conf certificates to turn me on, I just give encryption, baby, from dusk till dawn." Cheers, Stefan > Am

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

hahaha I understand it it may seem silly to discuss this or that name I think it will be of great benefit to find a good name in the long run, to make it easy to recognize and/or user support. 2017-12-05 15:06 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > ? > >> Am 05.12.2017 um

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

? > Am 05.12.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Luca Toscano : > > Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to use > for SSLPolicy? > > Luca > > 2017-12-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Totally agree with you. If you make a better proposal

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Just another idea: or perhaps MDDomain, to easily identify it is to specify domains managed by mod_md? 2017-12-05 15:03 GMT+01:00 Luca Toscano : > Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to use > for SSLPolicy? > > Luca > > 2017-12-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Stefan

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Maybe ManagedDomain and , as iiuc we are going to use for SSLPolicy? Luca 2017-12-05 14:47 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Totally agree with you. If you make a better proposal that avoids existing > overlaps, I might just pick it up. > > -Stefan > > > Am 05.12.2017

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Totally agree with you. If you make a better proposal that avoids existing overlaps, I might just pick it up. -Stefan > Am 05.12.2017 um 14:40 schrieb Luca Toscano : > > Hi Stefan, > > 2017-12-04 14:16 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Not much

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

Hi Stefan, 2017-12-04 14:16 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep > ' > I propose the following changes: > > 1. The simple, single line 'ManagedDomain' will be renamed to

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

+1! > On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep > ' > I propose the following changes: > > 1. The simple, single line 'ManagedDomain' will be renamed

Re: mod_md and ManagedDomain

On 12/04/2017 08:16 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep '

mod_md and ManagedDomain

Not much input regarding this naming change. Personally, I like to keep '