Thanks Bob for the reply and apxs win32 pointer.
I again checked at link http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi and found that the
2.2.11 nossl openssl (both) binaries DONOT contain lib and include folders at
all. Do I need to manually copy the stuff from apache 2.2.11 build or is there
a
2009/2/11 Pooja Maheshwari pooja.maheshw...@impetus.co.in:
I again checked at link http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi and found that
the 2.2.11 nossl openssl (both) binaries DONOT contain lib and include
folders at all.
I'm not sure if we're talking about the same thing, but extracting
then when the redirect request comes back to the app server, recognize
a hash is in it, and have it pull the content for that hash, and then
apache subsequently would cache based on that URL with the hash in it.
MIGHT be work the extra request and hashing time/storage.
Why go back to the app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi! I've tried to open DBM files created via APR code using Python, to no
success. Any suggestions?
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman / Arturo Busleiman @ 4:900/107
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, dave man...@gmail.com wrote:
acfg and bcfg are the arguments to the merge calback. cfg is the result that
the merge callback returns
...
merge_server{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79d0bcfg:0x2b45dc2385f0cfg:
0x2b45dc26fff0}
merge_dir{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79e8
Please ignore my message, this file is not really needed when
--with-expat=builtin is issued.
- Ravindra
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ravindra kravin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
When I untar 2.2.10 or 2.2.11, I don't see
srclib/apr-util/xml/Makefile.in. Has it been removed intentionally ?
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=649162
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=649791
Hmm ... I'm not sure I understand the logic in this one:
CACHE_DECLARE(apr_table_t *)ap_cache_cacheable_headers_out(request_rec * r)
{
apr_table_t *headers_out;
Also becomes more of a problem when my page's JS would have to know
for subsequent requests how to get the cached version, and not simply do
a PRG again, because it would not know if a cached version existed.
Just check for the existence of a file with the matching date and hash.
If it's
Dan Poirier wrote:
Lars Eilebrecht l...@eilebrecht.net writes:
Vincent Deffontaines wrote on 2009-02-08 13:20:23:
While reviewing Lucien's french translation for the trunk performance
tuning guide (misc/perf-tuning.xml), it has come to my understanding
that this document contains extremely
Hello.
I think this has come up before but I can't recall when.
In Mandriva french users found some errors in the error files. I have patched
apache for years for this. Please apply.
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net
diff -Naur
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:16, Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
I understand - you are using both directory AND server side configs.
directory configs do not get created until a request. And a merge should
never return the same structure, meaning you should get new configs. Even
the
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 13:21, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, dave man...@gmail.com wrote:
acfg and bcfg are the arguments to the merge calback. cfg is the result
that
the merge callback returns
...
merge_server{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79d0
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 13:21, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, dave man...@gmail.com wrote:
acfg and bcfg are the arguments to the merge calback. cfg is the result
that
the merge callback returns
...
merge_server{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79d0
On 02/11/2009 02:10 PM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=649162
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=649791
Hmm ... I'm not sure I understand the logic in this one:
CACHE_DECLARE(apr_table_t
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Chris Darroch wrote:
The httpd-mod_fcgid.xml file is my first whack at the IP clearance
template.
I renamed this .xml.utf8 this morning because I realized it has some
non-ASCII UTF-8 character sequences in it. I don't know if those will
pass through the
Now for every exported function we have pair of functions that accepts
pool_name and old one, which is just wrapper:
DBD_DECLARE_NONSTD(ap_dbd_t*) ap_dbd_open_pool(apr_pool_t *pool, server_rec *s,
const char *pool_name);
DBD_DECLARE_NONSTD(ap_dbd_t*) ap_dbd_open(apr_pool_t *pool,
On 2/11/09 4:29 PM, Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
What so you think?
Patch is ready, but it needs some testing before posting.
+1
I was looking to do the same thing to mod_memcache (which should be imported
into trunk, IMO...)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Brian Akins br...@akins.org wrote:
I was looking to do the same thing to mod_memcache (which should be imported
into trunk, IMO...)
kni...@juffin:~/micex/git/apache$ tree modules/memcache/
modules/memcache/
|-- SConscript
|-- mod_memcache.c
`-- mod_memcache.h
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:29:59 +0300
Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
In httpd.conf you can create named pool inside DBDPool pool_name or
without. In second case pool_name is DBD_DEFAULT_POOL_NAME.
Thus old functions and old configuration is preserved.
What so you think?
Patch is
Kevac Marko wrote:
Thus old functions and old configuration is preserved.
What so you think?
That sounds to me like it would be safe to backport such a thing to
v2.2. +1.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Brian Akins wrote:
I was looking to do the same thing to mod_memcache (which should be imported
into trunk, IMO...)
Would it make sense for mod_memcache to become a provider beneath
mod_socache, or am I missing something?
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Would it make sense for mod_memcache to become a provider beneath
mod_socache, or am I missing something?
mod_memcache really just provides the config glue for apr_memcache
so that every module that wants to use apr_memcache doesn't have
I am in favor of this for 2.3/2.4 as well -- it is functionality that
I have wanted (not enough to do, though...) for a while now.
-Brian
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Kevac Marko wrote:
Once again I want to propose patch for mod_dbd module. This
23 matches
Mail list logo
