On 4/18/24 10:40 AM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The attached patch is a current work in progress patch for httpd-trunk to use
> the new apr_ldap API that just landing in APR.
>
> The highlights:
>
> - Complete replacement of the previous API.
> - Will work against apr-2
On 4/18/24 3:21 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:40:21AM +0100, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The attached patch is a current work in progress patch for httpd-trunk to
>> use the new apr_ldap API that just landing in APR.
>>
>> The highlights:
>>
>> - Complete
On 4/12/24 1:02 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Apr 12 11:02:31 2024
> New Revision: 1916926
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1916926=rev
> Log:
> mpm_worker: Fix AH00045 about children processes not terminating timely.
>
> *
On 4/12/24 12:35 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Apr 12 10:35:10 2024
> New Revision: 1916925
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1916925=rev
> Log:
> mpm_event: Simplify pollset "good methods" vs APR_POLLSET_WAKEABLE.
>
> *
On 4/8/24 1:47 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Any concerns with documenting the ap_trust_cgilike_cl variable in e.g.
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/env.html ?
Not from my side.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 4/5/24 12:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I think I fixed all test failures, hopefully in the correct way. More eyes
> welcome.
>
> I have a few additional sporadic ERRORS:
>
> A] ERROR during teardown check for log file errors or warnings (twice):
>
> 04.04.2024 21:14:42.205465
Are you sure that you did not use outdated headers somehow?
DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT is defined in modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h
Regards
Rüdiger
On 4/4/24 12:49 PM, Steffen Land wrote:
> -1
> Get an error:
>
> Error C2065 'DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT': undeclared identifier mod_dav_fs
>
On 4/3/24 4:32 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 12:25:40PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> in the light of the recent xz attack I was wondering, whether we should also
>> reduce our library dependencies by no longer using sd_notify() in
>> mod_systemd (thus loading
On 2/16/24 2:10 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Will apreq 2.18 still be released?
>
> I think we should, but we need someone to do the release work and 3
> active PMC members to approve it. Prior to the recent activity, the
> subproject was essentially unchanged and unreleased for 10 years (with
On 2/15/24 9:28 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 2/14/24 20:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/9/24 11:59
On 2/14/24 3:45 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 2/14/24 08:19, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers
On 2/14/24 10:53 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any rules to use changes-entries or write directly in CHANGES?
>
IMHO change-entries is preferred. See
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/README.CHANGES?view=markup
I just noticed that we probably need a
On 2/9/24 11:59 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have noted to the reset() clean up too much in the balancers:
> mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.c for example does:
> +++
> for (i = 0; i < balancer->workers->nelts; i++, worker++) {
> (*worker)->s->lbstatus = 0;
>
On 2/2/24 12:50 PM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Fri Feb 2 11:50:07 2024
> New Revision: 1915534
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915534=rev
> Log:
> Merge r1909450 from trunk:
>
> Make sources build with latest clang version
>
> Submitted by: icing
> Reviewed
On 2/1/24 5:54 PM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Thu Feb 1 16:54:40 2024
> New Revision: 1915516
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915516=rev
> Log:
> Merge r1861793, r1862612, r1862724, r1877251, r1907672 from trunk:
>
> Add support for SHA-2 crypt() algorithm
On 1/26/24 4:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 1/26/24 15:57, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> There seem to be unrelated changes to mod_proxy_hcheck in the below. Is this
>> intended?
>
> Well mod_proxy_hchech was missing... I was planning another commit.
>
> Sh
There seem to be unrelated changes to mod_proxy_hcheck in the below. Is this
intended?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 1/26/24 3:25 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Fri Jan 26 14:25:15 2024
> New Revision: 1915411
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915411=rev
> Log:
> ab
On 1/25/24 8:04 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 1/24/24 11:31 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> Well, it turns out that in order for this to actually work, we would need to
>> rename README to README.md, so I'm inclined to revert
>> this change unless someone thinks
On 1/24/24 11:31 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Well, it turns out that in order for this to actually work, we would need to
> rename README to README.md, so I'm inclined to revert
> this change unless someone thinks differently.
How about using a symlink? Keep README and create a README.md symlink
On 1/12/24 1:22 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:22 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> Recently we seem to have new types of SPAM entries in Bugzilla. Instead of
>> adding the SPAM message directly they look
>> more like real bug reports / comments w
Recently we seem to have new types of SPAM entries in Bugzilla. Instead of
adding the SPAM message directly they look
more like real bug reports / comments with some context / relation to httpd or
even the specific bug (maybe AI generated) but then
contain SPAM links.
Examples:
On 11/28/23 10:29 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> Tried something in https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/396
> WDYT?
Looks good. Thanks.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 1/8/24 1:37 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:49 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 1/5/24 3:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> process_regexp.diff
>>>
On 12/25/23 9:55 AM, MIIM via dev wrote:
>
> I apologize in advance for posting this question to the development
> forum, but unfortunately the modules-development list is dead
> according to the list server.
>
>
> I have a module attempting to write a log file --
> not one of the Apache log
On 1/5/24 3:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:11 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 9:04 PM Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>> I am having some issue searching Bugzilla for any issue involving
>>> process_regexp in mod_headers.c .
>>>
>>> It finds nothing, so I am
On 12/20/23 4:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:40 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>>
>> I was surprised this made a difference to the behaviour on the wire. It
>> seems like the chunk filter has suboptimal behaviour here. If you take
>> an output brigade like either:
>>
>> a) [HEAP
On 12/19/23 4:44 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 05:19:50PM -, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Wed Nov 22 17:19:49 2023
>> New Revision: 1914045
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1914045=rev
>> Log:
>> Add an option to specify a source address.
On 11/24/23 5:41 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> On 24 Nov 2023, at 14:25, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>> + req->dn = dn;
>>
>> Don't we need to save the vals as well?
>
> We do - and we also need to apr_pstrdup() the dn to be consistent w
On 11/24/23 10:59 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 5:47 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 11/23/23 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:46 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:17 PM Rue
On 11/24/23 10:45 AM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
>
>
>
> /* Make sure that the filtered search returned a single dn */
>
> if (result == LDAP_SUCCESS && dn) {
>
> + req->dn = dn;
Don't we need to save the vals as well?
Index:
On 11/23/23 5:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:46 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 4:17 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/23/23 3:53 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> I am asking because I guess
On 11/23/23 3:53 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:11 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 9/11/23 3:50 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: jfclere
>>> Date: Mon Sep 11 13:50:21 2023
>>> New Revision: 1912245
>>>
&g
On 11/23/23 2:28 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 1:33 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/23/23 12:52 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
>>> On 23 Nov 2023, at 11:25, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>>> -if (
On 11/23/23 12:52 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> On 23 Nov 2023, at 11:25, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>> - if (req->dn == NULL || !*req->dn) {
>>> - ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_DEBUG, 0, r, APLOGNO(02636)
>>> - &q
On 11/23/23 11:22 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Thu Nov 23 10:22:58 2023
> New Revision: 1914067
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1914067=rev
> Log:
> Optimise handling LDAP authorization where LDAP was not used
> previously for LDAP authentication.
>
>
On 9/11/23 3:50 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Mon Sep 11 13:50:21 2023
> New Revision: 1912245
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1912245=rev
> Log:
> Arrange the bybusyness logic and prevent bad busy values
> this closes #383
>
> Modified:
>
On 11/20/23 4:19 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2023, at 15:10, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>> Revisiting this again. I guess the below patch should fix it.
>> I assume that only the checking on req != NULL is relevant.
>> r->user and req->dn do not
On 11/20/23 4:05 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 3:46 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:33 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:57 PM Graham Leggett via dev
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On 11/20/23 3:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 2:33 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:57 PM Graham Leggett via dev
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20 Nov 2023, at 12:26, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> Or we
On 11/20/23 1:07 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Mon Nov 20 12:07:11 2023
> New Revision: 1913977
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913977=rev
> Log:
> mod_authnz_ldap: Follow up to r1913962: r->user not used in
> ldapsearch_check_authorization().
>
>
>
On 11/19/23 11:45 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Sun Nov 19 10:45:05 2023
> New Revision: 1913962
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913962=rev
> Log:
> Apply earlier fix to the ldapsearch case:
>
> Arrange for backend LDAP connections to be returned
> to the
On 11/2/23 1:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 7:19 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 9/21/23 3:15 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
>>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/prox
If you revert r1913027, r1913024, r1913006, hence
--- modules/http2/h2.h (revision 1913024)
+++ modules/http2/h2.h (revision 1913006)
@@ -20,8 +20,6 @@
#include
#include
-#include
-
struct h2_session;
struct h2_stream;
@@ -41,9 +39,7 @@
#define H2_USE_POLLFD_FROM_CONN 0
#endif
+#if
Windows 64 bit is fine?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 3:52 PM, SteffenAL wrote:
> No go. All other modules fine, only mod_http2 error.
>
> Recap:
>
> On windows 32:
>
> Generating Code...
> h2_ws.h
> C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\http2\h2.h(173,17): error C2143: syntax
> error: missing ';'
On 10/16/23 3:18 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 15:12 schrieb SteffenAL :
>>
>> checkout.
>>
>> Looks like h2_ws.h :
>>
>> Generating Code...
>> h2_ws.h
>> C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\http2\h2.h(173,17): error C2143: syntax
>> error: missing ';' before '*'
>>
I am sorry, but #include "apr_encode.h" is still unconditional in h2_ws.c in
2.4.x. Fixed in r1913027.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 3:31 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> after some hickups with getting the new WebSockets support to
> compile on Joe's old computers, we try
On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 14:28 schrieb jor...@apache.org:
>>
>> Author: jorton
>> Date: Mon Oct 16 12:28:13 2023
>> New Revision: 1913019
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1913019=rev
>> Log:
>> Further h2 compile fixes:
>>
>> *
On 10/16/23 2:38 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> BTW is modules/http2 really CTR for 2.4.x? STATUS says only
> mod_proxy_http2 is.
>
> Anyway: I am +1 for r1913005 and r1913019 for 2.4.x, latter was
> sufficient to get 2.4 building on RHEL8 again (if only we had a CI to do
> this, oh...).
I am also
I will do.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 1:13 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> I added that patch to trunk and merged it into 2.4.x.
>
> I'll make another release candidate soonish. Someone wants to merge the back
> ports idling in STATUS?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 16.10.2023 um 12:55
First of all thanks for RM.
It looks to me that we have 2 accepted backports in the STATUS that have not
been merged.
This seems unfortunate.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 10/16/23 12:07 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
>
On 9/21/23 3:15 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Thu Sep 21 13:15:35 2023
> New Revision: 1912459
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1912459=rev
> Log:
> mod_proxy: Handle backend address renewal with address_ttl= parameter.
>
> Define a new proxy_address struct
On 9/8/23 9:43 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Fri Sep 8 07:43:17 2023
> New Revision: 1912181
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1912181=rev
> Log:
> back port proposal
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified:
On 8/25/23 9:52 AM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jorton
> Date: Fri Aug 25 07:52:31 2023
> New Revision: 1911908
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911908=rev
> Log:
> Update and reset.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
>
> Modified:
On 8/17/23 1:42 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> How are people feeling about another release?
>
> Since I have tons of bugfixes in 2.4.x and some pending features to port
> back, I offer to RM this.
>
> We have 5 items in 2.4.x/STATUS which lack votes. Would be nice if people
> could
On 8/22/23 1:48 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
> I believe we can add that to the backport proposal without resetting the
> votes.
Add what to which backport proposal?
Regards
Rüdiger
Currently 2.4.x fails to compile for me with the following error:
In file included from h2_c1_io.c:24:
h2_c1_io.c: In function ‘pass_output’:
/usr/src/apache/httpd-2.4.x/include/http_log.h:495:14: warning: ‘rv’ may be
used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
On 7/17/23 5:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Mon Jul 17 15:52:33 2023
> New Revision: 1911068
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911068=rev
> Log:
> Add patch proposal.
>
> Added:
> httpd/httpd/patches/2.4.x/alias-preserve-path.diff
>
> Added:
On 8/16/23 1:32 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> So a few questions:
>>>
>>> - Is it reasonable as a standalone additional HTTPProtocolOption to
>>> decide the behavior?
>>> - Thoughts on behavior change in 2.4.x?
>>> - 400 as a status code?
>>>
>>>
On 8/2/23 1:29 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi, at $bigco I am seeing more and more scanners reporting HTTP
> request smuggling but the byte stream is really just two pipelined
> requests. They are costly to debunk.
I guess I just miss the point, but how is the above related to the lower?
>
>
On 7/5/23 2:31 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 4:08 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 2:35 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/29/23 5:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:57 PM wrote:
&g
On 7/10/23 10:11 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 03:52:46PM -, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: ylavic
>> Date: Fri Jul 7 15:52:45 2023
>> New Revision: 1910861
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910861=rev
>> Log:
>> ab: Fix accounting of started connections.
On 7/7/23 1:00 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Fri Jul 7 11:00:34 2023
> New Revision: 1910846
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910846=rev
> Log:
> util_filter: More useful logging for brigade setaside/reinstate/adopt.
>
>
> Modified:
>
On 7/3/23 10:17 AM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 30.06.2023 um 17:22 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2023 um 16:45 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/30/23 4:15 PM, Stefan
On 6/30/23 4:15 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>
>
>> Am 30.06.2023 um 15:56 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 2:44 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/30/23 11:08 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: icing
On 6/30/23 11:08 AM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Fri Jun 30 09:08:23 2023
> New Revision: 1910704
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910704=rev
> Log:
> proxy: in proxy tunnels, use the smaller timeout value of
>client and origin as timeout for polling the
On 6/29/23 5:08 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 1:57 PM wrote:
>>
>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c (original)
>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c Tue Apr 25 11:57:22 2023
>> @@ -2790,7 +2790,11 @@ ap_proxy_determine_connection(apr_pool_t
>>
On 6/28/23 3:55 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:08 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/28/23 2:37 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: covener
>>> Date: Wed Jun 28 12:37:50 2023
>>> New Revision: 1910662
>
On 6/28/23 2:37 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Jun 28 12:37:50 2023
> New Revision: 1910662
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910662=rev
> Log:
> back to original patch in PR66672
>
> Since QSNONE will skip splitoutqueryargs, it's where we should fixup
On 6/28/23 12:38 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Jun 28 10:38:27 2023
> New Revision: 1910650
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910650=rev
> Log:
> act more like pre-r1908097 with rewrite
>
> - be more conservative with setting QSNONE
> - allow the query
On 6/9/23 6:28 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 6/9/23 14:58, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: rpluem
>> Date: Fri Jun 9 12:58:55 2023
>> New Revision: 1910327
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910327=rev
>> Log:
>> * Vote and comment [skip ci]
>>
>> Modified:
>>
Any feedback on my comments below?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 5/5/23 7:37 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/23 7:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:52:18 2023
>> New Revision: 1909411
>>
>> URL: http://svn.a
On 5/5/23 12:28 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 4/25/23 7:35 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:35:08 2023
>> New Revision: 1909409
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909409=rev
>> Log:
>
On 6/7/23 1:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Hi Giovanni;
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 12:02 AM wrote:
>>
>> Author: gbechis
>> Date: Tue Jun 6 22:02:37 2023
>> New Revision: 1910267
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910267=rev
>> Log:
>> mod_ext_filter: check exit status of filter
On 6/1/23 3:30 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote:
>>> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_request.c
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_request.c?rev=1910161=1910160=1910161=diff
>>>
On 6/1/23 2:21 PM, ic...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: icing
> Date: Thu Jun 1 12:21:03 2023
> New Revision: 1910161
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1910161=rev
> Log:
> *) core: add `final_resp_passed` flag to request_rec to allow
> ap_die() to judge if it can send out a
On 5/18/23 1:55 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:40 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/18/23 3:17 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> bump? Just was reminded by a thread on reddit (config unclear but
>>> probably not non-cfgi
fix, can we let spaces
> through mod_rewrite?
Any reason why we should not encode the spaces as proposed below?
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:18 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 3:14 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 5/18/23 6:45 AM, Benjamin Godfrey wrote:
> Hi, I'm working on the problem of Apache2 ignoring requests to any command in
> the chroot environment. I have seen complaints
> about this posted on a couple of websites, and I have not seen any solution.
> I seem to have narrowed the problem
On 5/11/23 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> This is a formal vote on whether we
On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
>> from Subversion to Git.
>> This means that our latest read/write repository will be
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 5/9/23 8:01 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 11:51 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/9/23 4:33 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at
On 5/9/23 4:33 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 2:10 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 12:55 PM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/9/23 12:16 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>>> Still getting feedback in the PR about break
On 5/9/23 12:16 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Still getting feedback in the PR about breakage. Any thoughts on options
> here, like allowing spaces or encoding rather than failing?
Allowing spaces is out of question for me as it creates an invalid request and
opens the door to response
On 5/8/23 9:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I might suggest another day or two because of the weekend and because it is
> so high-impact. Maybe an extra post to private@ in
> case some PMC members aren't tracking dev@ very closely.
>
>
I intend to close this vote in about 48 hours. It has been
On 5/9/23 12:00 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> VHS vs BetaMax anyone? :)
Video 2000 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_2000) rules :-)
Regards
Rüdiger
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 4/25/23 7:52 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:52:18 2023
> New Revision: 1909411
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909411=rev
> Log:
> *) mod_autht_jwt: New module to handle RFC 7519 JWT tokens within
> bearer tokens, both as part of the
On 4/25/23 7:35 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Tue Apr 25 17:35:08 2023
> New Revision: 1909409
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909409=rev
> Log:
> core: Add the token_checker hook, that allows authentication to take
> place using mechanisms other than
On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository
> from Subversion to Git.
> This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
> via svn.apache.org. It
> will be available via
On 5/5/23 2:37 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Down-thread, Giovanni asks about security patch handling. We can continue to
> use repos/private/pmc/httpd/ for that. That area will
> not go away. If people want to go "all git", then Infra can provide projects
> with a single, private repository that
This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from
Subversion to Git.
This means that our latest read/write repository will be no longer available
via svn.apache.org. It
will be available via Git at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
and
On 4/12/23 2:02 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 1:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 6:36 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>
> @ylavic
I am not a Windows guy, but I guess the best way to build trunk on Windows is
to use cmake which is integrated in later versions
of Visual studio.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 4/24/23 1:05 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build httpd on windoze...
>
> "The .dsp project files are
On 4/17/23 1:07 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 9:08 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> On 4/16/23 12:20 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
>>> On 14 Apr 2023, at 17:18, Ruediger Pluem >> <mailto:rpl...@apache.org>> wrote:
On 4/16/23 12:20 PM, Graham Leggett via dev wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2023, at 17:18, Ruediger Pluem <mailto:rpl...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>> Would that break configs like
>>
>>
>>
>> Alias /filesystemprefix/%{HTTP:X-example-header}
>>
&
On 4/14/23 4:07 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Fri Apr 14 14:07:49 2023
> New Revision: 1909137
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909137=rev
> Log:
> mod_alias: When an alias is declared inside a Location, make sure
> the balance of the URL is preserved to
On 4/12/23 12:35 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:26 PM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:18 PM ylavic wrote:
>>>
>>> @ylavic approved this pull request.
>>>
>>> Three approvals to get ci started?
>>
>> Nope.. It seems that gh actions don't run for PRs
On 4/11/23 11:36 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Tue Apr 11 21:36:55 2023
> New Revision: 1909073
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909073=rev
> Log:
> PR66563: escaping of url releated server vars
>
> Modified:
>
On 4/10/23 11:37 PM, BUSH Steve wrote:
> I just downloaded the apache 2.4.57 source code and attempting to compile on
> Windows, mod_rewrite.c fails with this error:
>
>
> I fixed it for my local build by editing modules/mapper/mod_rewrite.mak and
> updating the CPP_PROJ= lines to include
1 - 100 of 2558 matches
Mail list logo
