+1
> On Aug 20, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
>> This roughly reverts the httpd process to what we used prior to adopting
>> the Tomcat-esque policy for the whole ASF. We would have to document
>> this and possibly need it
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
[ ] +1: I support this proposal
+1
...and whatever you want to do with the old site is fine by me.
What level of traffic are we seeing on it? Shouldn't we just make a clean
break and respond to any URL into the old database
On Jan 2, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Pending IP clearance...
[+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility for its
maintenance
[ +/- 0] don't care won't help
[ -1] don't accept mod_macro as a standard module
+1
S.
--
scte...@apache.org
On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Let's simply reset this whole mess.
A proposal to adopt mod_firehose is attached.
[X] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[ ] Option 3: do not adopt
Dimpled chad: I would support option 2 if
On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:50 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 24.02.2012 12:12, Steffen wrote:
Looks like the hanging L's, which I reported way back, which was
investigated by Stefan
Could be but not necessarily. It depends on your MaxConnectionsPerChild
setting. The situation at w.a.o is due to
Remember the CHIL engine cleanup was fixed to prevent a dangling cleanup
function pointer... I forget which OpenSSL version got that fix but in any case
RH only recently backported it.
I'm sure I didn't test with any proxy config at the time.
S.
--
Sander Temme
san...@temme.net
Sent from
On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
All;
I stumbled across this yesterday and was hoping some of our more
experienced openssl developers may be able to offer suggestions on how I
can track this down. I've been testing on 2.2.21 though the code should
be the same in
On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Steffen wrote:
We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and no need
to exposure more for these.
Are they listed in STATUS under the Release Showstoppers section? That
currently only lists the need to remove undocumented modules as
On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:35 AM, André Malo wrote:
Here it's 80 chars (actually I'm use 78 personally) both about putting
multiple editors side by side and keeping diffs readable by email clients.
I'm in much the same mode: multiple 80 char wide windows side-by-side. I would
favor keeping the
Folks,
I've put in some updates to the mod_heart* modules, taken from the README
supplied with the modules and some perusal of the source code. I have not run
these as I'm too lazy to set up the servers. Review would be appreciated,
especially by the original authors (Cc), before backport
On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
hook handler prototypes are? That's more like developer documentation.
Thoughts?
I don't know about the history of similar decisions, but IMHO what you wrote
is good enough for 2.4.0.
Sounds good.
+pThe interval of 1 seconds is
On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I will crank out docs for these tomorrow and ping paul to review.
Thank you for getting this going: it seems to be the most constructive way to
resolve this issue.
S.
--
scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP:
On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
- mod_firehose: tcpdump for httpd
+1 on adopting.
S.
--
scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are
close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0...
My plan is to TR sometime this week...
+1, let's do it.
S.
--
scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/
On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Stealing a plan executed by Colm for 1.3, I'd like to propose that
we set a two week window following committers' return-from-ApacheCon
to execute any backports of general interest and apply important
fixes/backports to pregsub
On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:48 AM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
- licodeINSTALLDIR/code (default ProgramFilesFolder\Apache
Software Foundation\Apache2.2\)/li
+ licodeINSTALLDIR/code (default ProgramFilesFolder\Apache
Software Foundation\Apache2.3\)/li
Shouldn't those things be something
On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/11 Torsten Förtsch torsten.foert...@gmx.net:
On Friday, 11 November 2011 20:09:09 Jason Gionta wrote:
While I expect the count to increment by one after each
On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of
trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches
from trunk.
I have added version 2.4-HEAD to Bugzilla.
As well as 2.3.15-beta...
S.
--
scte...@apache.org
Folks,
The httpd table now has:
Jeff Trawick
Jean-Frederic Leclere
Stefan Fritsch
Rainer Jung
and myself
Who else is at the conference? Anybody joining tomorrow?
Rainer brought a Euro power strip, so this table's going to be right popular. (:
S.
--
scte...@apache.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Apache developers/users,
I have created a quick survey to see how YOU use Apache and what is important
to you:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/HFGDY3C
It's only eight questions, and there's only one matrix! Shouldn't take but a
minute to
On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 31 October 2011 18:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/31/2011 2:19 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Dear Apache developers/users,
I have created a quick survey to see how YOU use Apache and what is
important to you
On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for
an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon…
There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be
fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...
Thanks Jim, I was just
On Aug 31, 2011, at 7:20 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
We must advise that 1.3 is not affected, per our further research,
although we can note that the default configuration (MaxClients etc)
may already be inappropriate in any number of distributions, and
remind administrators to tune their
On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
+1 to component of libapreq2 under apache-httpd2. Is that an infra
ticket or do some folks here have access?
Done. IMHO the PMC chair should have the Bugzilla karma to do this.
If you don't have it, please ask infra to grant it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
Just a friendly (and final) reminder that applications for financial help to
attend
ApacheCon NA 2011 in Vancouver close this coming Friday 8th July (2200 BST :
UTC+1).
Financial assistance is available for Travel (planes, trains,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is
now accepting applications for ApacheCon North America 2011, 7-11 November
in Vancouver BC, Canada.
The TAC is seeking individuals from the Apache community at-large --users,
On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/23/2011 8:10 AM, Atsushi Ishii wrote:
Hi,
It's first time to post here.
Recently, I'm developing new function regarding ApacheBench(ab).
Present ApacheBench supports only single URL.
New function which I'm developing supports
All,
Are any of you planning to submit a session proposal for ApacheCon in Vancouver
that covers 2.4? Surely it will have been released by then...
Perhaps a session on what's New and Important? Or one on migrating from legacy
releases to the latest, greatest?
We have until the end of
is
preferred.
Thank you,
Martin
--
Sander Temmescte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
in
r1039304.
Committed in r1043835. Haven't reviewed it.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
looks for apr-util which
does not exist. I don't see this as a blocker.
+1
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
/ssl/ssl_howto.html#allclients
Issac
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
, set_error, NULL, OR_ALL,
+ Generate error message from within configuration),
AP_INIT_RAW_ARGS(If, ifsection, NULL, OR_ALL,
Container for directives to be conditionally applied),
+1
Pardon my rust, but what actually makes the process error out? Returning !nil?
S.
--
Sander
application/module/static files could add a config time check using
IfModule and use the Error directive.
Were you thinking of something else?
That sounds familiar, yes,
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http
in the VirtualHost, not in global
scope.));
ssl_die();
}
}
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
On Oct 23, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
As part of ApacheCon in Atlanta, the HTTP Server Project will have a MeetUp.
This MeetUp is freely accessible for all. If you're in Atlanta, whether for
ApacheCon or because you live there, please join us to discuss the HTTP
Server
Please let us know if you would like to come.
S.
- --
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMw4cZAAoJEJu4Y7D1G7iKZ0MP
On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:02 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
[ ] Vote on a 0.9.7 tarball as beta or GA
[+1] Bump to 1.0.0 and vote on tarball for GA
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Decent tests.
Even more decent:
Linux surtur 2.6.32-24-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 01:38:40 UTC 2010
x86_64 GNU/Linux
All tests successful.
Files=91, Tests=3362, 79 wallclock secs ( 2.31 usr 0.40 sys + 40.61 cusr 6.00
csys
\
--with-ssl=/usr/local \
CFLAGS=-DDEBUG -O0 -DDYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128 \
$@
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
in the dependencies since
mod_deflate is part of the default most complement. However, unless someone
(not me) comes up with the autofoo to build libz in absence of a viable
installed copy, we can let the mod_deflate autoconf soft fail like it does
today.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A
tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.16 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.16
Vote closes at 02:00 UTC on Saturday July 24 2010.
Thanks,
Paul
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8
.
Comments?
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
constitutes internal testing? Paul's work to upgrade www.a.o?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
Would OSCON be a good moment to branch 2.4.x? Or aren't we there yet? Are the
issues between us and branching in STATUS?
S.
--
Sander Temme
san...@temme.net
Sent from my phone
On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
what do you think about releasing
On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
n.b.: I only have commit on docs, so I couldn't actually put that in place
Committed in r951477. Thanks for going through these.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
.
So there would be most (default), all and minimal.
Before actually defining the according sets of modules, what do you think
about the general direction?
Rainer
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
that's our Alpha - Beta transition
point.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
might think.
We could launch an e-mail discussion, or setup a Survey Monkey (but keep it
SHORT!!!) or something like that.
Thoughts?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
On Jun 3, 2010, at 8:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/3/2010 9:59 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility should not be
a problem. Any idea about other popular modules? WSGI? mod_perl
- support and build with OpenSSL = 0.9.7a, albeit with (harmless)
compiler warnings about argument const-ness all over the shop
- drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.7a
- drop support for non-OpenSSL/derivatives of OpenSSL
+1 across the board.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727
, I've had blackouts covering this list. What were their concerns?
Were they discussed on this list?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
for the user^Wbuilder?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
. 2.3.7 will follow afterwards.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
with every server. I believe you have already
started working on that: good idea.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html
PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility should not be a
problem. Any idea about other popular modules? WSGI? mod_perl? Are they
ready for HEAD?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE
.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
] ; then
cp $apu_src_dir/build/find_apu.m4 build
+else
+cp $apr_src_dir/build/find_apu.m4 build
fi
# Remove any libtool files so one can switch between libtool 1.3
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
accepted, and
will close on the 7th July 2010.
Good luck to all those that will apply.
You are welcome to tweet, blog as appropriate.
Regards,
The Travel Assistance Committee.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
accepted, and
will close on the 7th July 2010.
Good luck to all those that will apply.
You are welcome to tweet, blog as appropriate.
Regards,
The Travel Assistance Committee.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
On May 23, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This seems to fail with non shared builds of mpms:
How can the Test framework find out whether the MPM has been built shared?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
changes in trunk,
I'd suggest either publishing a patch against 2.2.x HEAD somewhere (anywhere)
or attaching it to your patch for STATUS.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Crowd,
Since we have released our last release, how about we close the Apache
httpd-1.3 product in Bugzilla for entering new bugs? Say the word and I'll
click the clicky in the Bugzilla admin.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Folks,
Referring to this exchange:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-us...@openssl.org/msg60934.html
the culprit calling X509_NAME_oneline() is obviously us, around
ssl_engine_kernel.c: 1318 in 2.2.x-head. While this code has moved to
ssl_engine_log.c in trunk, we're still calling the
httpds when experimenting. But this
works. The module complement is what the perl-framework needs.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
time answering my simple question
-Daniel Ruggeri
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
session proposals: it merely makes
recommendations to the Planning Committee.
Key Dates:
April 4, 2010: Call for Participation closes
May 17, 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection notification
November 1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010
We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta!
Sander Temme
Apache
session proposals: it merely makes
recommendations to the Planning Committee.
Key Dates:
April 4, 2010: Call for Participation closes
May 17, 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection notification
November 1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010
We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta!
Sander Temme
Apache
1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010
We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta!
Sander Temme
Apache HTTP Server Track Coordinator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLpxTlAAoJEJu4Y7D1G7iKB64QAKNCzqAor7FYgGZ6pOQfx1Ww
23BnJ8T2TWoMjav31McX7GgMaZK9b5X4gGy
1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010
We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta!
Sander Temme
Apache HTTP Server Track Coordinator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLpxTlAAoJEJu4Y7D1G7iKB64QAKNCzqAor7FYgGZ6pOQfx1Ww
23BnJ8T2TWoMjav31McX7GgMaZK9b5X4gGy
from any more improvements to 2.0.
+1
Opinions? Volunteers? If there are no objections and no volunteer,
its something I'm happy to do later this week. I'll review the set
of ssl patches tomorrow.
I don't think I'd RM but I'll endeavor to test.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP
it seems that documentation is a work in progress.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
? Or am I
misreading you?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Begin forwarded message:
ASF Bugzilla is running its weekly stats at Sun Feb 7 23:08:02 UTC 2010
..
65 bugs for Apache httpd-1.3
Now that we have lowered the boom on 1.3, shall we close it out for new bugs?
Anyone have an opinion on the existing open bugs? Uproot them or let them
running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
There is a 1.3.42 release candidate for testing, and voting, at;
What happened to this, besides making
On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
+/- 1
[+1] Release httpd-2.3.5 as Alpha
Sigs good, it unpacks, builds and runs. Set it free. Give the packagers and
3rd party module developers something to play with (PHP5 for instance, does not
build).
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte
that broken commit] before lunchtime tomorrow. As 1.4.1 saw no -other-
objections than this problem observed at SVN, there's almost no reason
it won't be approved.
And the %lld printf formatter on MacOSX... small, but it does break a test.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727
On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:42 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/20/2010 10:01 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
And the %lld printf formatter on MacOSX... small, but it does break a test.
That's fixed on the branch, or no? About to tag 1.4.2.
I'm about to get on a flight, will test once under way
to roll into a *-deps, or are we canning the notion of *-deps
until such things solidify?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
http://apache.slashdot.org/story/10/01/12/1359206/Apache-May-Stop-13-20-Series-Releases
Quoting this article from Australia:
http://www.techworld.com.au/article/332190/apache_mulls_end_1_3_2_0_releases
Note: no buzz whatsoever about 2.4.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4
of dash. Please change the hash-bang line to execute a
bourne-compatible shell, such as /bin/bash on platforms affected.
Many thanks in advance for your help and testing.
--
Colm
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
There is a 1.3.42 release candidate for testing, and voting, at;
http://people.apache.org/~colm/1.3.42/
Not seeing gpg sigs or md5s on the tarballs. Didn't we used to do
of January 27th 2010, in Silicon Valley.
Alternative is the week of January 13th -- would this earlier date
change the ability of anyone to attend?
no difference to me
I'd prefer the later time slot.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
I was thinking it might also be a good time to get some httpd'ers
together and spend a day finishing 2.4, and cross-pollinate ideas with
the TS developers.
+1 Count me in.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3
closes at 18:00 UTC on Monday November 30 2009.
I could use an extra couple of hours. Who else is still playing or
about to start?
I've had my look and my say, but yes if others are willing to spend some time
I'd encourage Paul to extend the vote.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP
we should include appropriate versions of libraries like libz and pcre
in our Deps tarball is another discussion...
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Nov 30, 2009, at 1:12 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-
clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.4-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/- 1
[-1] Release httpd-2.3.4 as Alpha
for shipping the package
heads from a read-only medium like an optical drive
or PXE is a sound idea. Any initiative, installation method or distribution
that makes this easier to manage might increase adoption.
S. bikeshedI'd base it on BSD though/bikeshed
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3
it.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Tests: 72 Failed: 72)
Failed tests: 1-72
t/ssl/verify.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
Can somebody verify that this is a problem in trunk and not with my
perl-framework setup?
Thanks.
Stefan
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8
.
Otherwise +1.
Regards,
Graham
--
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
insists on reconfiguring, recompiling and
re-keying every time I run it on my Mac. It reconfigures when I don't
want it to, and I can't make it reconfigure when I do want it to.
I don't have the perl-fu, time or energy to figure this out.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727
know.
+1
See mod_ssl.c:314, ssl_scache.c:228 and ssl_scache.c:199 in trunk to
see how mod_ssl does it.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
to an apparent
client remote_ip, , , most)
Thoughts?
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold
it into trunk.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Aug 20, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Paul J. Reder wrote:
On 08/20/2009 12:00 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hardening Enterprise Apache Installations Against Attacks by Sander
Temme
Heh... Couldn't you just buy Sander a beer and ask him nicely not to
attack
your Apache installation?
I
already fixed in svn, but also needs svn up on
people.apache.org.
I ran svn up just now. Next rsync run should catch it: I saw the
updates come in.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
1 - 100 of 462 matches
Mail list logo
