Also all is fine with building against APR 1.2.7.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 19:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Done.
I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:47:22PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our
flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre community, and liasoning back
our changes to pcre to it's project?
I would expect that anybody who commits local changes to
Done. I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts working now. Also no build error apu_version anymore. All tests passed here, including mod_perl and other common mods.
Steffen http://www.apachelounge.comYeah it builds fine with APR and APR-util trunk, nothing was needed
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box, no aditianal SDK's)
FWIW, I'm focused on the Win64 fixes on trunk, backporting compatible
changes to 2.2, and ignoring 2.0 for Win64.
Of course you don't need any SDK's - they are included. For VS 6.0 users
their
-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:55
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box, no aditianal SDK's)
FWIW, I'm focused on the Win64 fixes on trunk
Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply totaled if trying as Win64.Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...I noted that i didn't have any SDK's installed because if you use the free edition of
VC.net 2005 you need Platform
was copied in whole from a working 2.2.0 install
Steffen- Original Message -From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 11:55Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Compiler: Visual Studio .net 2005 Pro (out of box
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine.
The report is:
error c005 at 6FD0F220 (mod_ssl).
c005 is 'access violation'.
Using FileMon, this appears to get triggered when trying to read in a
server
Joost de Heer wrote:
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine.
The report is:
error c005 at 6FD0F220 (mod_ssl).
c005 is 'access violation'.
Using FileMon, this appears to get triggered when trying to
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply
totaled if trying as Win64.
Yup, mostly hopeless back then.
Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.
Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...
Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this
-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 21:44
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Joost de Heer wrote:
Steffen wrote:
So far I have two reports that mod_ssl is given issues.
Strange, I tried it on three XP boxes and all is fine
On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO. Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed underdarwin x686 and win64.so don't necessarily expect
2.2.1 to build win64clean yet out
On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply totaled if trying as Win64.Yup, mostly hopeless back then. Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.
Focusing on 2.2 is a great
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My thought is reroll aprutil, which i'll do tonight. The problem isn't
with httpd; the problem's with the maintenance on two platforms, and that's
what the release notes/CHANGES will say.
Updated CHANGES. I'm also looking at the Win64 patch for apr-util before I
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 05:17
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts
Steffen wrote:
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
This is apparent in my test case.
Slowing things down in the debugger - the flaw goes away, which is to say
some blocking logic isn't blocking, probably an attribute of some recent
minor refactoring of the
PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 18:07
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
When build Apache 2.2.1 with APR 1.2.2, the Perl scripts are working.
This is apparent in my test case.
Slowing things down in the debugger - the flaw goes away, which
. Comments on that
list are welcome.
Bill
Original Message
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA]
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:15:55 -0500
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrowe rowe-clan.net
To: dev apr.apache.org
My gut says let's push to the trunk code for readwrite.c
On 4/1/2006 at 12:28 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16
On 4/3/2006 at 8:54:29 am, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/2006 at 12:28 pm, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
This is fixed on APR 0.9 / 1.2 branches and 1.3 trunk.
Brad's fixed this on 1.2 branch and 1.3
So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
If so, that's not a very compelling tarball for those needing to support
Windows.
If 2.2.1 is being labeled as non-GA already then that's quite
appropriate, move on to 2.2.2 as soon as possible.
Jess Holle wrote:
So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
Correct, but the 2.2.2 tarball will build on windows (with a bumped aprutil).
That's why I think the concensus, between borked Win32/Netware and a missing
proxy patch, is to reroll and
:17
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts with shebang line are not working on win32, get permature
end of script headers error.
Steffen, please clarify, is this a regression from 2.2.0 w/ APR 1.2.2?
What's your ScriptInterpreterSource say?
Bill
On 04/02/2006 02:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237view=rev has not
been
backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(.
So I am now -1.
Should I propose r379237 for backport?
++1 ! :)
Proposed for
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows? Is this desired?
Regards
Rüdiger
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 04:57:43PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows?
I
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
So I guess this part of the code should be conditional and only active
either on non windows (BTW:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:17:00PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
That's allowed I think,
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows? Is this desired?
IMHO - this was an outright Win32-specific
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:17:00PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
That's
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1.tar.gz
Thanks,
Paul
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 11:28:15AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
m Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
+1, passes all tests on ubuntu.
--
Colm MacCárthaigh
+1: OS X 10.4.5 (gcc4 and gcc3)
+1: Solaris 8 (gcc3)
Passes all perl-framework tests
On Apr 1, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 11:28:15AM -0800, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
Tests ok on Solaris 10 (U2-beta, sunstudio)
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
Subject: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1.tar.gz
lördagen den 1 april 2006 21.28 skrev Paul Querna:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613
On 04/01/2006 09:28 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
+1, compiled and started on
RHAS 3 update 3, gcc 3.2.3, glibc 2.3.2, kernel 2.4.21
RHAS 4 update
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
On 04/01/2006 11:24 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/ssl/proxy.t
söndagen den 2 april 2006 00.32 skrev Ruediger Pluem:
On 04/01/2006 11:24 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
: Sunday, April 02, 2006 00:29
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make
21:28
Subject: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
MD5s:
f330230636926d08872d84343b08fa16 httpd-2.2.1.tar.bz2
63e7f3e24adda0888a48a247b4eb5613 httpd-2.2.1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
It looks like this is because
Oden Eriksson wrote:
I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
=46ailed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
=2D=
=2D-
t/ssl/proxy.t 172 58 33.72% 3
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237view=rev has not
been
backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(.
So I am now -1.
Should I propose r379237 for backport?
++1 ! :)
--
Steffen wrote:
Perl scripts with shebang line are not working on win32, get permature
end of script headers error.
Steffen, please clarify, is this a regression from 2.2.0 w/ APR 1.2.2?
What's your ScriptInterpreterSource say?
Bill
Paul Querna wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/1/06, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
Outch
Didn't a Windows guy make that change? (duck)
VC++ 2005 (plus msdev.exe) from the command line (makefile.win); OpenSSL
0.98a, manual manifest embedding.
main.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
referenced in function _show_compile_settings
Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Error
49 matches
Mail list logo
