*Still* waiting for the sync between people and www
httpd.apache.org hasn't slurped up the updates yet (eg: index.html)
On Jul 27, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of
Jim,
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
*Still* waiting for the sync between people and www
httpd.apache.org hasn't slurped up the updates yet (eg: index.html)
the announcement at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
reads:
...
A condensed list, CHANGES_2.2.12 provides the complete
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of releasing 2.2.12!
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of releasing 2.2.12!
I have upgraded www.apache.org to 2.2.12, yell if you see anything odd :)
Thanks,
Paul
Once all syncs, I'll refresh the main site and announce...
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a
Rainer Jung wrote:
You -do- understand that the service control manager can be very poor
at completing a service removal until the next reboot? There are lots
of interesting delays to uninstalling. I presume you -k stop'ed first.
It has bitten me more than once.
Yes, and since I'm a Unix
On 26.07.2009 09:54, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It doesn't matter whether I use | or the new ||. It doesn't matter
whether I use rotatelogs in ErrorLog or CustomLog or both.
Note that || and |$ have not yet been backported.
It was done with the following backport:
r777193 | jim |
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.07.2009 09:54, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
It doesn't matter whether I use | or the new ||. It doesn't matter
whether I use rotatelogs in ErrorLog or CustomLog or both.
Note that || and |$ have not yet been backported.
It was done with the following backport:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
LOL - that's terrific ... May seems like a year ago already. Has it been
that long since 2.2.11 shipped? We really aught to get our act together
December it was, release often is pointless unless it has serious security
major exploit bug
I built and tested on Windows XP SP3. There's no Win source download
available at /dev/dist yet, but I did the build using the Unix sources.
It looks good in principle, so
+1
but I have some observations to remark (all tests done with
Win32DisableAcceptEx). See especially remark number 5).
1)
Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log shows:
[Sat Jul 25 15:11:03 2009] [notice] Disabled use of AcceptEx() WinSock2 API
(OS 10048)Normalerweise darf
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log shows:
[Sat Jul 25 15:11:03 2009] [notice] Disabled use of AcceptEx() WinSock2 API
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log shows:
[Sat Jul 25 15:11:03 2009] [notice] Disabled use of AcceptEx()
On 25.07.2009 18:36, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log shows:
[Sat Jul 25
On 25.07.2009 18:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
Oups:
and 12, so I'll shut down now and come back when I really know the
shut down - shut up
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 18:36, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log
Still not a complete solution to the puzzle, but some more findings below.
On 25.07.2009 20:55, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 18:36, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using
On 26.07.2009 00:41, Rainer Jung wrote:
Now the new thing: as I reported before, I was testing rotatelogs, but
then when you asked about peculiarities I forgot to mention rotatelogs.
And yes: as soon as I throw out rotatelogs, the problem disappears. When
I add rotatelogs I can reproduce the
Possible patch would be moving the start handling from post config to
pre config. That way everything gets easier (we are not establishing
listeners and shut them down again shortly after, not establishing
rotatelogs etc.).
Patch against 2.2 head at
Hi,
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts
Nick Kew wrote:
Installed it on OpenSolaris, tried the test framework.
Seems most of the latter made no attempt to run.
I have yet to find time to investigate why - hence no
vote yet.
I have the test framework running now: seems what I
had before was incomplete.
I got a bunch of failures in
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
Hrm... Just 2 binding
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... but I don't recall
putting that up for
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hrm... Just 2 binding +1 votes, Rüdiger and myself... Can I get
another Amen?!
Amen!
Oh - you want a vote :) Working on that right now; just getting the
most modern openssl behaving right, to export postmortem diagnostics
e.g. sensible .pdb's. So likely later today.
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And of course, -1 previously reverted; presuming you are updating the
apr announce and site as RM, right?
That's an APR question so I'm -1 on answering it here
*snark* :) :)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And of course, -1 previously reverted; presuming you are updating the
apr announce and site as RM, right?
That's an APR question so I'm -1 on answering it here
In part... my -1 is gone here once there is
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
Passes all tests with latest perl-framework and with apr-1.3.7 on
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1
Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... but I don't
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for NetWare
no regressions; tested with mod_jk,
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for:
Solaris 10
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for:
tfm32
tfm64
Works as exected on both versions
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
I'm going to give it
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Solaris 10 (sparc)
Ubuntu 8.10
CentOS 4
OS X 10.5.7
also good on Slackware 12.2
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 on release.
-
On 21.07.2009 20:44, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Solaris 10(SPARC): worker, event and prefork MPM build and start up.
Only limited test results from the framework due to
incomplete
perl framework on my machine, but no regressions noted.
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
/PS
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
Is this tarball created with APR 1.3.7 (yet unreleased)?
Regards
Rüdiger
On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
Is this tarball
44 matches
Mail list logo
