On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the words of the Blue Raja, What the fork
Done in r627764 :)
Should we consider this for 2.2 backport?
On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-substituted
by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or
self contained, or in no way could result in overlaps, then flattening
isn't required. :)
In
On Feb 14, 2008, at 07:53, Vincent Bray wrote:
On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-
substituted
by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or
self contained, or in no way could result in
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote:
On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-
substituted
by another rule, then you should flatten. If they are one-shots, or
self contained, or in no way could result in
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote:
On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-
substituted
by another rule, then you should
On Feb 14, 2008, at 08:50, Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement string.
Yes in concept. Don't
On Feb 14, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Vincent Bray wrote:
On 12/02/2008, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if you have substituted content that you think will be re-
Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement string.
+1, anything requiring this depth-of-understanding
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:00 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 08:50, Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such
as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this
On Feb 14, 2008, at 09:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's not even just that there is a second substitution but rather
that the pattern/regex being looked for could possibly be the
result of a previous substition.
If you have to subs like
s/foo/bar/
s/plum/apple/
there is no way one
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:06 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such
as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this substitutions
replacement string.
+1, anything
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:06 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default and providing an option such as:
'q'uick: Substitute more efficiently, but further substitutions will
not be able match across the boundaries of this
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:09 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 09:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
It's not even just that there is a second substitution but rather
that the pattern/regex being looked for could possibly be the
result of a previous substition.
If you have to subs like
In the words of the Blue Raja, What the fork
Done in r627764 :)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2008 15:12
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: mod_substitute docs
On Feb 14, 2008, at 9:06 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
Anyone else +1 for flatten-as-default
On Feb 11, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 14:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm a little concerned if the module ships /without/ the 'f'latten
flag
triggered by default. I'd rather the module offered the inverse
option.
This is truly a 'bug' users won't understand
On Oct 22, 2007, at 14:07, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm a little concerned if the module ships /without/ the 'f'latten
flag
triggered by default. I'd rather the module offered the inverse
option.
This is truly a 'bug' users won't understand (my text contains
'jimfoojag',
why isn't it
On Oct 20, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Vincent Bray wrote:
Hullo,
I'm attempting to document this module but can't figure out what the f
(flatten) flag does (bucket brigade munging makes my eyes cross). Any
clues?
Say you are looking for 'foo' and have a bucket that
contains 'jimfoojag'. The fast
On 22/10/2007, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say you are looking for 'foo' and have a bucket that
contains 'jimfoojag'. The fast way to handle this would
be to split off 3 buckets from this, one containing
'jim', the other containing 'jag' and the middle one that
contains the
On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Vincent Bray wrote:
On 22/10/2007, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say you are looking for 'foo' and have a bucket that
contains 'jimfoojag'. The fast way to handle this would
be to split off 3 buckets from this, one containing
'jim', the other containing
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Say you are looking for 'foo' and have a bucket that
contains 'jimfoojag'. The fast way to handle this would
be to split off 3 buckets from this, one containing
'jim', the other containing 'jag' and the middle one that
contains the substitute for 'foo' (say it's 'bar'). The
On Oct 22, 2007, at 1:42 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Say you are looking for 'foo' and have a bucket that
contains 'jimfoojag'. The fast way to handle this would
be to split off 3 buckets from this, one containing
'jim', the other containing 'jag' and the middle one
Den Saturday 20 October 2007 22.59.58 skrev Vincent Bray:
Hullo,
I'm attempting to document this module but can't figure out what the f
(flatten) flag does (bucket brigade munging makes my eyes cross). Any
clues?
Here's a start anyway:
http://people.apache.org/~noodl/mod_substitute.xml
Hullo,
I'm attempting to document this module but can't figure out what the f
(flatten) flag does (bucket brigade munging makes my eyes cross). Any
clues?
Here's a start anyway:
http://people.apache.org/~noodl/mod_substitute.xml
--
noodl
25 matches
Mail list logo
