Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
This, to my mind, is now well into the realm of 4.0-sized changes.
---
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
a quick note here about the prospect of further restructuring to support
jpms. I have learned today that if a module (e.g. `org.apache.jena.arq`) does
not contain a single top level
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
See PR #408 for updating the shaded Google guava.
---
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
PR merged and email sent to dev@jena to let everyone know this has an
impact on ServiceLoader files.
---
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
`RemovalNotification` is used in the constructor for `CacheGuava`.
---
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
Indeed, these dependency questions are issues that I need to solve... I
would prefer to simplify the über-jar `jena-osgi` dependency of
`commons.rdf.jena` by creating lean modular jena
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
> Compilation in JPMS requires a module-info.java and is distinct from
compiling in JDK 9+.
The issue is for trellisldp to solve surely? The transitivity is an
indirect jena-osgi dependency and
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
Compilation in JPMS requires a `module-info.java` and is distinct from
compiling in JDK 9+.
> What is the issue here? Does anything break?
A quick background of the use
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
jdeps complains about oaj.dboe so having a common automatic-moulde-name
seems not to work.
Clearing that out and xerces, then
/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/bin/jdeps -R
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
I ran:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-9-openjdk-amd64/bin/jdeps -cp 'lib/*'
lib/jena-arq-3.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
and the only split packages reported are for Xerces/xml-apis. Various
packages under
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
What is the issue here? Does anything break?
oaj = org.apache.jena
> the module system does not allow two distinct modules (e.g.
org.apache.jena.arq and org.apache.jena.base) to export
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
re: `org.apache.jena.atlas` dependents in `org.apache.jena.arq` (namely
`org.apache.jena.riot`)
I attach an excerpt from a `jdep`s output looking at `jena-arq-3.7.0.jar`,
sorted
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
I've tried out the PR and it passes the build and Fuseki starts up. I
renamed the ServiceLoader files as `org.apache.jena.sys.JenaSubsystemLifecycle`
(I have a script for that now,I can do that after the
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
jena-arq does not need to export `org.apache.jena.atlas` - it needs to
export `org.apache.jena.atlas.csv`, org.apache.jena.atlas.data` etc.
`org.apache.jena.atlas` does not depend on `riot`, it
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
the module system does not allow two distinct modules (e.g.
`org.apache.jena.arq` and `org.apache.jena.base`) to export the same package
(e.g. `org.apache.jena.atlas`).
There
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
I don't see a split package in `org.apache.jena.atlas` - it has classes and
sub-packages in `jena-base` and separate sub-packages in `jena-arq` but I don't
see a package being split. That should not be a
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
That sounds like a set of changes (e.g. module renaming) much better suited
for 4.0.
---
Github user christopher-johnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/401
In working with the automatic modules, I have also found a split
with`org.apache.jena.atlas`. This is between `org.apache.jena.arq` and
`org.apache.jena.base`.
Would it make
18 matches
Mail list logo
