I don't consider that as a bug and the release is already cut off.
More over, I'm not sure it's a good idea to decrease the start level to
59 (depending of the users usage). I would prefer to increment the
default bundle installation start level.
Regards
JB
On 04/05/2012 07:48 AM, Christian
If the release is already cut then it is ok to defer.
Increasing the default installation start level is also ok for me.
Christian
Am 05.04.2012 07:59, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
I don't consider that as a bug and the release is already cut off.
More over, I'm not sure it's a good idea to
+1 (binding)
Tested in different projects without problem.
Regards
JB
On 04/04/2012 05:49 PM, Jamie G. wrote:
Hi,
We resolved 76 issues in this release (web page will be published post
RC promotion):
+1
Thanks
Freeman
On 2012-4-4, at 下午11:49, Jamie G. wrote:
Hi,
We resolved 76 issues in this release (web page will be published post
RC promotion):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page
Staging repository:
OK, typically I simply checkout the tag and check if the build is
successfully there; then I check the locally build assemblies and try
to run them. Finally I download the assemblies and also run them
(besides the typical notice, keys, ... check). After all this had been
successfully I upgrade my
Good point Andreas,
My bad: I tested only the binaries.
Agree to -1 (binding).
In that case, we could:
- apply the Andreas' patch on src assemblies
- apply the Christian's patch on the start level
Regards
JB
On 04/05/2012 12:00 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
OK, typically I simply checkout the
As per the noted issues I'm cancelling this vote, and will pick up the
patches, then re-cut.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Good point Andreas,
My bad: I tested only the binaries.
Agree to -1 (binding).
In that case, we could:
Hi,
We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post
RC promotion):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-008/
is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix
startup time?
Does it due to a different approach of class loading?
There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix
during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox?
Thanks in
Hi Romain,
you mean that one is longer than the other ?
on which version ?
I didn't notice that.
Regards
JB
On 04/05/2012 02:40 PM, Romain Gilles wrote:
is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix
startup time?
Does it due to a different approach of class
Ok,
Do you have an advice about one vs the other.
I have realized some bench on the registry and equinox 3.7.1 seems to
perform better than Felix 4.0.1.
Is there any other rooms for investigation? Class loading ...
Romain.
Le jeudi 5 avril 2012, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
Hi Romain,
you
Did a quick walkthrough through the cli.
Experimented with misc projects and everything looks cool.
What I didn't like at all is the user experience with the choose url. The
idea is fantastic, but I didn't have a smooth experience with none of the
features I choose:
Some of them have outdated
A few weeks ago, I spent some time trying to tune up a bit the startup time
of karaf and made a few modifications to private copies of felix framework,
file install and karaf. I'll try to bring them backs that they can be part
of the next releases, but those are not major modifications, so
Can you open an issue and document what you experienced?
Christian
Am 05.04.2012 16:42, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
Did a quick walkthrough through the cli.
Experimented with misc projects and everything looks cool.
What I didn't like at all is the user experience with the choose url. The
idea
i'm working on patching Camel's Karaf commands to print more nicely
(columns aligned regardless of a field's length) [1]. unfortunately, my
first attempt's implementation was a little too heavy, and would benefit
from code reuse.
i recently observed a JIRA [2] which suggests that Karaf may have
Hi Reuben,
We have an implementation of the console table available.
You can take a look:
./shell/console/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/shell/console/table
but it's only available on trunk for now (so in the next Karaf 3.0.0).
I don't think it's a good idea to merge on Karaf 2.2.x, as we
If you like you can use the table impl JB mentioned to make some of the
3.0.0 tables prettier.
For reference you can look at the package/command module where the new
table is already used.
Christian
Am 05.04.2012 17:14, schrieb Reuben Garrett:
i'm working on patching Camel's Karaf commands
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Reuben,
We have an implementation of the console table available.
You can take a look:
./shell/console/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/shell/console/table
but it's only available on trunk for now (so in the
Hi Claus,
From a feature perspective, of course it's cool ;)
But more we merge new feature on Karaf 2.2.x, more we postpone Karaf
3.0.0, as users won't update to Karaf 3.0.0.
From a technical perspective, I'm fully agree with you, table rendering
is interesting (whatever the Karaf version
True, but releasing 3.0.0 should not block us from delivering functionality
to 2.2.x or even 2.3.x.
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource http://fusesource.com
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Well I am talking about an end user library which has utility methods
so people can use that in their Karaf commands / plugins.
The irony is that Karaf is all about modularity. So would it not be
possible to offer a neutral Karaf library that people can use on both
2.x and 3.0.
I assume the
For 2.3.x, I'm fully agree and it's the purpose.
Really, don't get me wrong, I have no problem to merge that in Karaf
2.2.x. It's just that it could be a good message for the users in order
to say: hey guys, look what it's cool in Karaf 3.0.0 ;)
Regards
JB
On 04/05/2012 07:31 PM, Ioannis
It makes sense, and I'm not against at all from a technical perspective
(see my e-mail replied to Ioannis).
Regards
JB
On 04/05/2012 07:32 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Well I am talking about an end user library which has utility methods
so people can use that in their Karaf commands / plugins.
Just built the src distro
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-008/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.6/apache-karaf-2.2.6-src.tar.gzand
all looks well. Fourth time's the charm? :)
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jamie G. jamie.goody...@gmail.com
I think it would make sense to user the karaf.util project for that.
Currently we just inline it into projects but we could also make it a
bundle.
We could move the table functionality and other general tools there.
Christian
Am 05.04.2012 19:32, schrieb Claus Ibsen:
Well I am talking about
you're right, Christian - the table implementation is simple enough that a
full-blown service might be excessive for my immediate needs. moreover,
importing packages is already a kind of service consumption. for better or
worse, i might have gotten carried away with my enthusiasm for OSGi.
all
+1 non-binding. Source code builds on CentOS 6, Windows 7, and Vista. Same
sorts of issue Ionnis cited, but no blockers.
-
Mike Van (All links open in new tabs)
Committer - Kalumet
Atraxia Technologies
Mike Van's Open Source Technologies Blog
--
View this message in context:
OK did the typical key, artifact, notice checking and except for some
known, minor and non-blocking issues everything looks good on that
front.
The source packages build well, exactly as the tag, on Windows 7
x86_3 and Linux coprime 3.2.12-1-ARCH x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7
CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz
+1 (binding)
Freeman
On 2012-4-5, at 下午8:33, Jamie G. wrote:
Hi,
We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post
RC promotion):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page
Staging repository:
29 matches
Mail list logo
