Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/185/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18953 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
tom liu updated SOLR-1395:
--
Attachment: katta-solrcores.jpg
pls see the katta-solrcores picture.
proxy and subproxy are different process,
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1381/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18318 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2791:
Attachment: LUCENE-2791.patch
attached is an updated patch (fixing some indentation, adding some p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-2728.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> EnwikiContentSource does not properly identify the name/id of the Wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-2748:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Convert all Lucene web properties to use the ASF CMS
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966392#action_12966392
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
Hoss, you going to commit? Please backport t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-2241.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Upgrade to Tika 0.8
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966386#action_12966386
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2748:
-
Initial setup is complete. You can see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966376#action_12966376
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-2779:
If the assumption still stands that an IndexInp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2791:
Attachment: WindowsDirectory_amd64.dll
here's one i compiled for 64-bit. just name it WindowsDirec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2791:
Attachment: WindowsDirectory.dll
heres a dll built for 32-bit windows.
to use it, just put it in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2791:
Attachment: LUCENE-2791.patch
here's an initial patch:
All tests pass using this directory with -D
WindowsDirectory
Key: LUCENE-2791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2791
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Store
Reporter: Robert Muir
Attachments: LUCE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966358#action_12966358
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2471:
-
Hmmm. Are we going to do this?
Optimiz
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-3.x/199/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 21375 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot closed LUCENE-2307.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Never reproduced since, closing as stale and outdated
> Spurio
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2120/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Some threads threw uncaugh
jquery is actually in the .war file, so you read it directly from the server.
The file?file=/velocity... request streams content from inside your
solr configuration directory
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Looking at Solr 3.x, it seems like that path to jquery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966285#action_12966285
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2790:
-
Shai, what about:
bq. My only concern i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966272#action_12966272
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1568:
---
FYI, I believe I have backported this to 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966248#action_12966248
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2790:
Patch looks good. All tests pass for me. Let's gi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966241#action_12966241
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-773:
--
I believe I have backported all trunk spatial re
On 12/2/2010 at 1:34 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> the window you see isn't necessarily the window that has the focus :-(
A graph of the number of times I've made this mistake over time would look a
lot like a flat line.
The fact that this is such an easy mistake to make at this point in UI
evolut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966238#action_12966238
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1729:
So is 1709 ok, but 1729 isn't?
> Date Facet n
layout.vm refers to old version of jquery
-
Key: SOLR-2261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2261
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: web gui
Reporter: Eric Pu
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[...]
> flds = sort.getSort();
> assertEquals(flds[0].getType(), SortField.FLOAT);
> assertEquals(flds[0].getField(), "weight");
> -
> - try {
> - //bad number of parens, but the function parser can handle an extra
> close
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2110/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler
Error Message:
ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=49 closes=48
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ERROR: S
Yonik,
I'm in the process of backporting, and this commit and the subsequent revert on
QueryParsingTest looks weird, so I thought I would double check the intent.
See below
Begin forwarded message:
> From: yo...@apache.org
> Date: September 25, 2010 5:06:11 PM EDT
> To: comm...@lucene.apache.
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/2081/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestThreadSafe.testLazyLoadThreadSafety
Error Message:
unable to create new native thread
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2790:
Attachment: LUCENE-2790.patch
Fixed your test failure
> IndexWriter should call MP.useCom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966181#action_12966181
]
Peter Karich commented on SOLR-1729:
Peter Sturge,
in SOLR-1709 you said that you are w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966178#action_12966178
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2790:
Hmm... something is amiss. I hit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966167#action_12966167
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2790:
Patch looks great!
My only conce
I think we should drop the item by item change list and instead focus on 3
things:
1. Prose describing the new features (see Tika's changes file for instance) and
things users should pay special attention to such as when they might need to
re-index.
2. Calling out explicit compatibility breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated SOLR-1942:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1942.patch
updated to trunk - if somebody has time a review would be appreciate
I'm trying to backport all the spatial stuff to 3.x from trunk. It's a bit
hairy, so there might be some intermittent breakage.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2790:
Attachment: LUCENE-2790.patch
Okay, this patch fixes remaining threading issue in IW.merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2790:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2790.patch
Patch fixes the threading issue Earwin reported, by checking whether t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966118#action_12966118
]
JohnWu commented on SOLR-1395:
--
TomLiu:
Do you means that the patched solr with three c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966112#action_12966112
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2790:
-
bq. I checked who implements useCompoun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Earwin Burrfoot updated LUCENE-2790:
Attachment: LUCENE-2790.patch
Check this patch out.
It moves noCFS ratio to useCompoundFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966110#action_12966110
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2790:
test-core passed for me before I uploaded the pat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966108#action_12966108
]
Earwin Burrfoot edited comment on LUCENE-2790 at 12/2/10 8:12 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966103#action_12966103
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2790:
-
Fails addIndexesWithThreads with Concur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966094#action_12966094
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2789:
-
bq. We'll still need to copypaste CFS h
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790.
Shai
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:04, Shai Erera wrote:
> > Earwin:
> >
> > LogMergePolicy.getUseCompoundFile() is a public and not private API on
> > trunk, not deprecated and used.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966090#action_12966090
]
JohnWu commented on SOLR-1395:
--
TomLiu:
yeah, today I use the katta Git code (Maybe ka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2790:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2790.patch
Patch applied on trunk. I took the opportunity to fix some minor Javad
IndexWriter should call MP.useCompoundFile and not LogMP.getUseCompoundFile
---
Key: LUCENE-2790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2790
Project: Lucene - Java
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 15:04, Shai Erera wrote:
> Earwin:
>
> LogMergePolicy.getUseCompoundFile() is a public and not private API on
> trunk, not deprecated and used. Perhaps you are talking about something
> else?
I was speaking of getLogMergePolicy that you mentioned:
> 1) Fix IW to not case t
Earwin:
LogMergePolicy.getUseCompoundFile() is a public and not private API on
trunk, not deprecated and used. Perhaps you are talking about something
else?
I'm aware of LUCENE-2773, but still, if you look at LMP's
getUseCompoundFile() in trunk, you'll see it does not factor in the
noCFSRatio set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966076#action_12966076
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2789:
---
Can we move the CFS code outside and the co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966071#action_12966071
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2789:
-
I'd like to a see a switch like setNeve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966070#action_12966070
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2789:
+1
This would be an awesome simp
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
>> During the work on Column Stride Fields I was actually thinking that
>> Compound vs. Non-Compound should not be a global decision since we now
>> have codecs and each codec s
Let codec decide to use compound file system or not
---
Key: LUCENE-2789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2789
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Componen
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 14:19, Shai Erera wrote:
>> You can't remove it on 3x, it's used by a host of deprecated methods
>> that access LMP's settings through IW.
>
> Remove means deprecate in 3x and remove in trunk. Should have been more
> clear about that.
We can drop it from trunk right away. It
>
> You can't remove it on 3x, it's used by a host of deprecated methods
> that access LMP's settings through IW.
>
Remove means deprecate in 3x and remove in trunk. Should have been more
clear about that.
For LMP is
> just returns the value of getUseCompoundFile (that is, until Mike's
> patch th
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> What the hell is mergeFactor?! Right now this LMP setting serves two
> completely separate roles at once.
> 1. it governs a maximum number of segments on a "level";
> 2. it also limits a maximum number of segments that can participate in
>
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> During the work on Column Stride Fields I was actually thinking that
> Compound vs. Non-Compound should not be a global decision since we now
> have codecs and each codec should use its own way of writing files.
> Maybe it would make things
> Hmm .. now that I look closely at it, MP has useCompundFile/DocStore
> methods, and LMP just adds getUseCompoundFile(). Why?
> And IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader...) queries instanceof LMP, instead
> of calling mp.useCompoundFile()?
getUseCompoundFile - is a setting on LMP.
MP.useCompoundFi
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> 2010/12/2 Shai Erera :
>> Simon, sorry about that: MP = MergePolicy, LMP = LogMergePolicy. WTF = ...
>> well I know what that is :-).
>
> That one means "wow that's funny" right? Heh.
hmm yeah :D I was just wondering what he was talkin
2010/12/2 Shai Erera :
> Hmm .. now that I look closely at it, MP has useCompundFile/DocStore
> methods, and LMP just adds getUseCompoundFile(). Why?
> And IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader...) queries instanceof LMP, instead
> of calling mp.useCompoundFile()?
Hmm I don't know.
> So perhaps we
2010/12/2 Shai Erera :
> Simon, sorry about that: MP = MergePolicy, LMP = LogMergePolicy. WTF = ...
> well I know what that is :-).
That one means "wow that's funny" right? Heh.
Mike
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lu
Simon, sorry about that: MP = MergePolicy, LMP = LogMergePolicy. WTF = ...
well I know what that is :-).
In 3x, IW.getLogMergePolicy which is called by some public (albeit
deprecated) API throws IllegalArgumentException if MP is not LMP. In trunk
this API is gone now (thanks to Earwin?), so it's l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966040#action_12966040
]
tom liu commented on SOLR-1395:
---
solrHome is set :
# webapps/yourapp/web.xml
this is conf of f
Actually, in trunk IW doesn't break on anything else.
There's one private no-longer-used method I forgot to delete on my
drop-all-deprecations spree.
And there's a block in addIndexes, that explicitly checks instanceof,
and only then casts to LMP.
I'm against consolidating MP and LMP. MP is a dam
Shai, I always have trouble to figure our what you are talking about
in the first place since you are never introducing the abbreviations
you are using :)
->> Consolidate MP and LMP (WTF) :)
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Hmm... but MegePolicy is our abstract base
Hmm... but MegePolicy is our abstract base class, and LogMergePolicy
adds alot of concrete stuff, ie choosing merges according to "level"
so that you get an exponential staircase of segments in your index.
Conceptually it seems like they are separate? Like if another merge
policy came along that
Hi
While IndexWriter declares it accepts a general MP, it will actually fail if
the given instance is not LogMP. So I wonder if we shouldn't consolidate
both of them into one, and pull up all of LMP features to MP. I think all of
LMP's features are useful for any kind of MP, and if someone wants t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966031#action_12966031
]
Peter Sturge commented on SOLR-1709:
It's a good idea to apply SOLR-1729 in any case, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966029#action_12966029
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2755:
Getting rid of the IndexWriter member in CMS is n
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1330/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 18571 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/2090/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.TestLBHttpSolrServer.testSimple
Error Message:
expected:<3> but was:<2>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<3> but was:<2>
at
75 matches
Mail list logo
