[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-3137:
--
Attachment: SOLR-3137.patch
patch with the general idea of what I am thinking - we store the orig solr.x
When solr.xml is persisted, you lose all system property substitution that was
used.
-
Key: SOLR-3137
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3137
Project: S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13209040#comment-13209040
]
Greg Bowyer commented on SOLR-3079:
---
looks like there is talk of a 3.6 release, how would
I have not gotten totally to the bottom of this, but I have found out some info
at least - when one of these tests doesn't
close a searcher, it's not some thread that is hanging. So somehow a searcher
is not being released somewhere on random occasions - I've thought that must be
some
super edge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe resolved LUCENE-3754.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Lucene Fields: New,Patch A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3785:
Attachment: line-per-test.txt
> Replace ant macros for running concurrent tests with ant-junit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208867#comment-13208867
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3785:
-
An alternative output from lucene tests; I lik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208846#comment-13208846
]
Martijn van Groningen edited comment on LUCENE-3778 at 2/15/12 10:12 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208837#comment-13208837
]
Dawid Weiss edited comment on LUCENE-3785 at 2/15/12 10:11 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208846#comment-13208846
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3778:
---
Yes, it would look somethi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3785:
Description:
ant-junit4 is an ANT task for running tests in parallel (on slave JVMs). Its
advanta
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1741/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest
Error Message:
ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=11 closes=10
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: ERROR: SolrIndexSear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208837#comment-13208837
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3785:
-
An output for full lucene tests under junit4.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3785:
Attachment: lucene-tests.txt
This is an output for all lucene tests (junit4).
> R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208826#comment-13208826
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3785:
-
An example improvement over trunk. I've design
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208819#comment-13208819
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3785:
-
{quote}
jvm-crash resilience (I wrote tests th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3785:
Attachment: trunk2.txt
trunk1.txt
junit4-2.txt
juni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3785:
Attachment: failure-cases.patch
This patch is not intended for inclusion, it provides all kinds of
Right, that makes sense, we have no authority to re-license anything.
I removed them.
Thanks,
Erick
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : 2> ...solr/webapp/web/js/jquery.sparkline.js and a couple of others
> : already had a license notification in them. I added in the Apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2947:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2947.patch
I will commit this shortly.
> DIH caching bug - EntityRunner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer reassigned SOLR-2947:
Assignee: James Dyer
> DIH caching bug - EntityRunner destroys child entity processor
>
: 2> ...solr/webapp/web/js/jquery.sparkline.js and a couple of others
: already had a license notification in them. I added in the Apache
: license information, should I have?
IANAL but I'm pretty sure you should *not* replace/add an ASL header to
any file that already has some other license hea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208784#comment-13208784
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Thanks Tommaso: i committed this.
Also a tiny
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss resolved LUCENE-3791.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
> ant eclipse should setu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3789:
Attachment: LUCENE-3789.patch
tiny simple patch against trunk... 3.x'd look slightly diffe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208766#comment-13208766
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
bq. OK, if there is no objection I wil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208767#comment-13208767
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
But it does work, +1
> ant e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208761#comment-13208761
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
OK, if there is no objection I will commit thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208755#comment-13208755
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
Yes, you won't have a "named" formatter -- thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208753#comment-13208753
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Thanks Robert for taking care of this,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1740/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208747#comment-13208747
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
This patch actually works, at first it seems l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-3791:
Attachment: LUCENE-3791.patch
git patch, but should work with patch -p0 <...
> an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208733#comment-13208733
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
I really can't explain how it works other than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208711#comment-13208711
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3791:
---
Hey cool, how does that work? I only know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208708#comment-13208708
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3791:
-
I don't think its selfish, +1 for configuring
ant eclipse should setup default project formatting.
Key: LUCENE-3791
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3791
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Compon
Why not move docs to http://readthedocs.org/
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Christopher Currens
wrote:
> Erg. Was it related to the whole documentation thing? I'm pretty sure
> it's "frowned upon" for our documentation to break SVN every time we do a
> release, so we should probably figure o
Erg. Was it related to the whole documentation thing? I'm pretty sure
it's "frowned upon" for our documentation to break SVN every time we do a
release, so we should probably figure out a solution for that. :P
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
ok new patch, with more refactoring... no more nocommits :)
n
Ick, I'm in the middle of publishing and working with Joe @ site-dev. We've
totally f'd up svn. He's asked we stop doing things and he's going to fix it
and get back to us... At least we're active.. ;) ~P
> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:20:29 -0800
> From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1739/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
I made some changes to the website in staging. Just a few things regarding
the blog list, a little bit of left padding and adding a recent news header
above it. I also changed the link style a little bit. Feel free to revert
any/all changes I've made. :)
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Feb 14, 20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
updated patch:
* each tokenstream gets its own AnalysisEngine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208609#comment-13208609
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Tommaso, I will make another prototype patch t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208595#comment-13208595
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Hi Robert,
reusing the CAS is good, as
Hi Robert,
2012/2/15 Robert Muir
> I think these are thread-safety problems related to using the same
> analysis engine instance?
>
> See prototype patch on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731, this is also
> causing some performance issues I think.
>
> Currently I think because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chantal Ackermann updated SOLR-3136:
Description:
Overriding equals() and hashCode() of FacetField and Count to provide equality
BOM indeed - thanks for the catch.
> From: bode...@apache.org
> To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:02:24 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Site / docs
>
> On 2012-02-14, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to use the upload a tar.gz file to add docs to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208587#comment-13208587
]
James Dyer edited comment on SOLR-2847 at 2/15/12 5:09 PM:
---
Trunk
FacetField and Count : Override equals() and hashCode()
---
Key: SOLR-3136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3136
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer resolved SOLR-2847.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Trunk: r1244553
Branch_3x: r124459
> fix test bug in DistributedSpell
I think these are thread-safety problems related to using the same
analysis engine instance?
See prototype patch on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731, this is also
causing some performance issues I think.
Currently I think because no CAS is reused, its just slow and the
possibilit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3731:
Attachment: LUCENE-3731_speed.patch
Hi Tommaso, I noticed some of the tests here are really slow..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208567#comment-13208567
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
Yes, I know that I can write it. But it means I'
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder lucene.net-site-staging
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/lucene.net-site-staging/builds/119
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: s
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder lucene.net-site-staging
while building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/lucene.net-site-staging/builds/117
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason: sche
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1738/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
I agree!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:51 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Luce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208550#comment-13208550
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3778:
This sounds like a good idea! G
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-trunk/389/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10872 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Robert,
>
> This was definitely caused by your commit.
>
> Eclipse is wrong: common-build.xml is not a stand-alone Ant file, and
> everywhere it is imported, javadocs is defined.
No, eclipse is definitely correct. depending on a non-existe
Robert,
This was definitely caused by your commit.
Eclipse is wrong: common-build.xml is not a stand-alone Ant file, and
everywhere it is imported, javadocs is defined.
Please revert. (You have been dismissive in the past about catering to IDE
quirks, Robert, so I'm hopeful that you'll impose
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208544#comment-13208544
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3754:
-
Committed to trunk.
Backporting to branch_3x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3790.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Shai Erera
Committed the fix in rev 1244532.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208532#comment-13208532
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3790:
-
Thanks Shai! I tested this locally and the tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208525#comment-13208525
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3790:
This is the reason -- SearchTravRetVectorHighlig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208523#comment-13208523
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3768:
-
I opened LUCENE-3790 for the followup bug
benchmark cannot parse highlight-vs-vector-highlight.alg, but only on 3.x?!
---
Key: LUCENE-3790
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3790
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3768.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Thanks Sami, upon backporting
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1737/
2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMABaseAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeExcept
Expose FilteredTermsEnum from MTQ
--
Key: LUCENE-3789
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3789
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core/search
Affects Versio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208460#comment-13208460
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
fix for the issues reported by Steven
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Another cleaner fix would be to add a protected final method to
> RewriteMethod that calls this method from MTQ. So anything subclassing
> RewriteMethod can get the enum from inside the RewriteMethod class which
> is the "correct" way to
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Another cleaner fix would be to add a protected final method to RewriteMethod
> that calls this method from MTQ. So anything subclassing RewriteMethod can
> get the enum from inside the RewriteMethod class which is the "correct" way
> to h
Hi Simon,
I had the same issue with a customer, too (for a custom RewriteMethod). I used
reflection to call the method :-)
I agree with you, the bug is the following:
getEnum() is protected so it is intended to be called *only* by subclasses
(that’s the idea behind protected methods). They are
This might have been caused by my commit, but see my previous email...
its bad that checkouts in lucene appear to be 'broken' in eclipse,
becuase the ant common-build 'xml' is invalid (i dont understand how
this was depending on 'javadocs' task before)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Apache Jenki
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> hey guys, I am working on different rewrite methods etc. and the fact
>> that getEnum is protected drives me nuts. I always have to put stuff
>> into the o.a.l.search package if I w
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/393/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 33624 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208439#comment-13208439
]
Erik commented on SOLR-2708:
I want to define externally how a @Field annotated attribute is re
New binary request/response format using Avro
-
Key: SOLR-3135
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3135
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Response Writers, sea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208418#comment-13208418
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2708:
--
I really need to come back to this and simplify it mor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208416#comment-13208416
]
Erik commented on SOLR-2708:
This patch would solve my current problem.
I just checked out the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-3788.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Separate getting Directory from IndexR
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1736/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.uima.UIMATypeAwareAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeExcep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208414#comment-13208414
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Thanks,
by the way, I would be glad to see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208408#comment-13208408
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
In that case, SegmentInfos is public, so y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208407#comment-13208407
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
Cool. I really appreciate your hel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208400#comment-13208400
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
You're right Uwe, I can do that. But it's still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208397#comment-13208397
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3760:
---
bq. I can still use them in 3.x, but won't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208396#comment-13208396
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3760:
-
{quote}
It does load the norms and deleted doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208395#comment-13208395
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
You also made that comment:
bq. If someone has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208393#comment-13208393
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-3731:
-
Ok, I noticed this was due to an issue
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> It makes sense to me, but it also means that 4.0 will go out with deprecated
> API that will exist until 5.0 is out.
>
> I only raised it to learn if this was done by mistake, or there is some
> logic behind it. I guess that for me, reading MIGR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208389#comment-13208389
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3760:
bq. I mean in the full picture of the applicatio
Thanks a lot for the kind words and the warm welcome!
My background is from FAST (now Microsoft) and I've been working on the ESP
search engine for about five years at FAST's R&D headquarters in Norway. I
relocated to FAST's Japan office in 2005 and I've been helping selling and
delivering sea
It makes sense to me, but it also means that 4.0 will go out with
deprecated API that will exist until 5.0 is out.
I only raised it to learn if this was done by mistake, or there is some
logic behind it. I guess that for me, reading MIGRATE will be enough, but I
cannot speak for others.
I don't m
Hi Shai,
I think in some cases its good for us to add deprecated APIs to trunk
rather than completely breaking users.
We can look at these as 'migration paths' for the user...
Here is a good example of one i specifically requested (Mike
implemented, thanks!):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208382#comment-13208382
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3760:
-
{quote}
You mean if IndexReader.getCommitUserD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13208381#comment-13208381
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3788:
---
I did not want to complain, it was just al
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
