David Smiley created LUCENE-4939:
Summary: Join's TermsIncludingScoreQuery Weight has wrong
normalization
Key: LUCENE-4939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4939
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lance Norskog closed SOLR-1413.
---
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 3.3
The test infrastructure has had a huge upgrade since
{{ java.lang.NullPointerException }})
- Build # 404 - Still Failing!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Part_4_100012749.1366255901256"
X-Jenkins-Job: Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX
X-Jenkins-Result: FAILURE
Precedence: bulk
--=_Part_4_100012749.1366255901256
Mark S created SOLR-4733:
Summary: Rollback does not work correctly
Key: SOLR-4733
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4733
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey closed SOLR-4732.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.3)
Assignee: Shawn Heisey
On IRC, Hoss wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved SOLR-4730.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.3
Thanks Uri, nice improvement for th
Got it, thanks.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> you merge to 4x as usual and then you merge the fix to lucene_solr_4_3 as
> well. you place the Changes notice already in the 4.3 section when you
> commit to trunk.
>
> simon
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Erick Er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634740#comment-13634740
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4725:
--
Currently, the logic (discovery mode) is that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634738#comment-13634738
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4731:
---
What operating system are you using? I wonder if its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634618#comment-13634618
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4701:
Could you explain the approach used, in particular
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634555#comment-13634555
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-4730:
-
Lucene trunk which will be Lucene 5.0 needs Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634540#comment-13634540
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4732:
I'm not sure how this should be fixed. SOLR-4662
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634531#comment-13634531
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4732:
This is the solr.xml the user had, on Solr 3.5:
{
Shawn Heisey created SOLR-4732:
--
Summary: CoreAdmin - SWAP and RENAME with shared instanceDir and
no dataDir - problems after Solr restart
Key: SOLR-4732
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4732
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634526#comment-13634526
]
Uri Laserson commented on SOLR-4730:
Patch is attached.
The github instructions should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uri Laserson updated SOLR-4730:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4730.patch
> Place link to Solr wiki in a more prominent place
>
Uri Laserson created SOLR-4731:
--
Summary: Fresh clone of github lucene-solr repo already has
modified files somehow
Key: SOLR-4731
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4731
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634505#comment-13634505
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4725:
---
bq. I think that a message should be logged saying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634500#comment-13634500
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4725:
If you have cores that don't have explicit name at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4718:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was:
Yes, it certainly is, and it will run fine. The reason we don't necessaril
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634497#comment-13634497
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4718:
---
bq. I don't even know if it's possible to set up a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634496#comment-13634496
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4718:
---
Yes, it certainly is, and it will run fine. The r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634473#comment-13634473
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4718:
bq. What are the cons to always using ZK?
I misse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634472#comment-13634472
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4730:
---
yeah, lucene-solr github repo is essentially the sam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634467#comment-13634467
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4730:
---
after you modify the file, you can run 'ant document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634466#comment-13634466
]
Uri Laserson commented on SOLR-4730:
Is the lucene-solr github repo the same thing as t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634465#comment-13634465
]
Uri Laserson commented on SOLR-4730:
Sure...one sec...
> Place link to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634463#comment-13634463
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4730:
---
By the way, this page is generated automatically fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634460#comment-13634460
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4730:
---
Nice idea:
maybe instead of:
{noformat}
This is the
Uri Laserson created SOLR-4730:
--
Summary: Place link to Solr wiki in a more prominent place
Key: SOLR-4730
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4730
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-4661.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.3
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed rev
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/5162/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_17 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 230 seconds
Stack Trac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4662:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4662.patch
OK, this has both change Mark and I were discussing. Tests pass, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634432#comment-13634432
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4725:
---
I focused so much on dataDir, I didn't even really c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634429#comment-13634429
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4725:
If you get rid of the name attribute, how do you d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634401#comment-13634401
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4725:
---
bq. 1> in coreContainer, do we really want to defaul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey reassigned SOLR-4661:
--
Assignee: (was: Shawn Heisey)
That assignment was done accidentally with keyboard shortcuts.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634381#comment-13634381
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4725:
--
Well, I'll just close 4725 after this gets che
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/5215/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b84 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZk2Test.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Server at http://127.0.0.1:37980/onenodecollectioncore returned non ok
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey reassigned SOLR-4661:
--
Assignee: Shawn Heisey
> Index Version & Gen look out of sync in replication UI when master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634372#comment-13634372
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-4661:
Joel: please note my earlier comments...
bq. I did some m
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: A release candidate is available from:
: http://people.apache.org/~vajda/staging_area/
-1 to releasing the files with the following MD5 checksums...
c84b71c718cee06bff63d5757115aa71 pylucene-4.2.1-0-src.tar.gz
a49300178884804ba9f7438a19732b21 py
WOOT
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:33 PM, wrote:
> Author: mikemccand
> Date: Wed Apr 17 19:33:48 2013
> New Revision: 1469040
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1469040
> Log:
> prompt for GPG password up front
>
> Modified:
> lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
you merge to 4x as usual and then you merge the fix to lucene_solr_4_3 as
well. you place the Changes notice already in the 4.3 section when you
commit to trunk.
simon
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Simon:
>
> I want to be sure I don't mess this up, and never having be
Simon:
I want to be sure I don't mess this up, and never having been a RM I'm
not all that familiar with the process. When you say "roll another
release" will you merge 4x or do I need to merge any changes I need in
4.3 into lucene_solr_4_3 as well as 4x?
Thanks,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-4714.
Resolution: Invalid
There's really not enough detail here to indicate a Solr problem.
It sounds like you ar
{{ java.lang.NullPointerException }}) -
Build # 389 - Failure!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Part_0_316637105.1366227395613"
X-Jenkins-Job: Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX
X-Jenkins-Result: FAILURE
Precedence: bulk
--=_Part_0_316637105.1366227395613
Content-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4662:
--
Attachment: SOLR-4662.patch
Here is a patch from my first quick review of this - it fixes a few mostly
cool, i opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4938
We should still have explicit tests for this, and there is still the
mystery of how this test ever passed at all!
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> @rob you can add the fix too if you want that is fine I w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4938:
Attachment: LUCENE-4938.patch
This is the patch i sent to the dev list. But we should add simple t
@rob you can add the fix too if you want that is fine I will roll another
release anyways
simon
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I'll open an issue. We should at least fix the test for 4.3 if possible
> (the indexsearcher change can wait)
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:19
Robert Muir created LUCENE-4938:
---
Summary: IndexSearcher.search() with sort doesnt do min(maxdoc, n)
Key: LUCENE-4938
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4938
Project: Lucene - Core
I'll open an issue. We should at least fix the test for 4.3 if possible
(the indexsearcher change can wait)
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I see the bug (two bugs).
>
> One bug is the test does IndexSearcher.search(query, Integer.MAX_VALUE,
> sort)
>
> In the case of searc
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Thomas Koch wrote:
sorry, but -1 for Windows build:
OK: I was able to build JCC 1.16 with Python27 on Win32 (Win7).
Fail: I could not build PyLucene 4.2.1 with Python27 and Java 1.6.
After having upgraded from my old ant 1.8.0 to ant 1.9.0 (make now requires
ant 1.8.2) I
See SOLR-4725. Basically I screwed up and introduced a change in
behavior whereby defining multiple cores with the same name or dataDir
will cause that core to refuse to load. Mark pointed out that having
multiple cores, though dangerous, is sometimes reasonable. I've got a
patch up that corrects t
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-4.x/235/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 442 lines...]
[junit4:junit4] Completed on J0 in 388.19s, 7 testsFATAL:
hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: java.io.IOException: Unexpected
termination of the channel
hudson.remoti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-4333:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4333.patch
Here is an improved test that shows off the problem a little better. This
ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634308#comment-13634308
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4662:
--
Well, if you're finding issues with the altern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4725:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4725.patch
Preliminary patch to coordinate with SOLR-4662 changes Mark is doing
On Apr 17, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
> the warning has been given 6 days ago.
Robert warned 6 days ago he would roll a release in two weeks. His warning is
not your warning that you would roll a release today. I think you are confusing
Robert's warning for a warning you did
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
> > here is my family hand holding. (btw. I think the analogy is bogus but
> that is my personal opinion and I stated my points here)
> >
> > I will upload RC0 on Friday 36 hours from
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> here is my family hand holding. (btw. I think the analogy is bogus but that
> is my personal opinion and I stated my points here)
>
> I will upload RC0 on Friday 36 hours from now.
Thank you. When working with a community of developers, t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634241#comment-13634241
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4662:
---
I'll quickly put up a check point patch and perhaps
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634233#comment-13634233
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4662:
---
I've got some work I'm in the middle of, and perhaps
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> 4.3... are we there yet? How much longer?!
>
see jack this is exactly what I mean. The "how much longer" questions are
the root of all evil here. IMO we should prevent this buy just calling a
vote and if tehre is a serious bug the vote fai
here is my family hand holding. (btw. I think the analogy is bogus but that
is my personal opinion and I stated my points here)
I will upload RC0 on Friday 36 hours from now. Please backport bugfixes to
the 4.3 branch. Please don't rush into anything please don't make any crazy
feature commits ple
{{ java.lang.NullPointerException }})
- Build # 403 - Failure!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Part_24_870060212.1366219295617"
X-Jenkins-Job: Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX
X-Jenkins-Result: FAILURE
Precedence: bulk
--=_Part_24_870060212.1366219295617
Cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634219#comment-13634219
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4662:
--
Hmmm, I just pulled it out, thinking of puttin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) updated SOLR-3838:
Attachment: SOLR-3838.patch
bq. I am not a UI designer, but it might be nice
4.3... are we there yet? How much longer?!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:43 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org ; Simon Willnauer
Subject: Re: 4.3
Think Family :)
I told my wife and kids now, in April, that I'll be going to
co
Adam Hahn created SOLR-4729:
---
Summary: Using a copyField with * as the source doesn't work
Key: SOLR-4729
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4729
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Think Family :)
I told my wife and kids now, in April, that I'll be going to
conference in Berlin in early June. I'll still tell them about this N
times before I actually leave. I won't get in a taxi one morning
heading for the airport and tell her "Well, I told you I'd go back in
April". Well,
wait, blockers? Sure we wait. Anything else I don't think we should wait
for. after the release is before the release. Mark, you are right it's 6
days but there are more committers than robert and all he said is he will
do it in 2 weeks. I really feel this is a conflict of interests here at
this po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634181#comment-13634181
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-3251:
--
{quote}
{code:java}
Index: solr/core/src/java/org/apac
I see the bug (two bugs).
One bug is the test does IndexSearcher.search(query, Integer.MAX_VALUE,
sort)
In the case of search-without-sort, there is some code that essentially
does Math.min(maxdoc, ndoc) so that if you request more documents than
actually exist in the index, we create a smaller p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634179#comment-13634179
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-3251:
--
{quote}
And by the way, i'm sorry if this suggestion s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634161#comment-13634161
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3251:
---
And by the way, i'm sorry if this suggestion seems t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634150#comment-13634150
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3251:
---
+++ solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634138#comment-13634138
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4662:
---
I've got it, I'm working on a pass that has a few up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634134#comment-13634134
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4662:
--
Hmmm, OK, I can pull that out ASAP. How about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reopened SOLR-4662:
---
Assignee: Mark Miller (was: Erick Erickson)
Reopening - I'm going to take a close pass over this.
Unfortunately I have one blocker issue for 4.3, where does that weigh
in? I can fix it tomorrow, but I'd really hate to have it go out with
this in.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> +1 for stabilization only for 4.3 at this point. It seems like last time
> there was at le
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634113#comment-13634113
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4662:
---
Finally getting to doing some review here.
I'm -1 o
+1 for stabilization only for 4.3 at this point. It seems like last time there
was at least one last minute feature change that broke something in 4.2 but
didn’t get noticed for a few days (which is normal) but 4.2 was already out by
then. A two-week window would have prevented that situation.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-4935.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.4
5.0
> CustomScoreQuery has br
Whats going on here? I saw this with jrockit too. Maybe its a bug in the
test
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server <
jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/5212/
> Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_17 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
>
> 1 tests f
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/5212/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_17 -client -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.queries.function.TestFunctionQuerySort.testSearchAfterWhenSortingByFunctionValues
Error Message:
Requested array size exceeds VM limit
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:29, "Thomas Koch" wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> sorry, but -1 for Windows build:
>
> OK: I was able to build JCC 1.16 with Python27 on Win32 (Win7).
> Fail: I could not build PyLucene 4.2.1 with Python27 and Java 1.6.
>
> After having upgraded from my old ant 1.8.0 to ant 1.9.0 (ma
+1
I'm investigating the ShardSplitTest failures.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
> > I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/
> >
I see a few issues myself (that dont need to cause a big conflict):
1. Simon doesn't want things to destabilize due to last minute
feature-shoving. this is a real problem and I totally see his point.
2. Mark wants some time to do some cleanup/checks/bugfixing/whatever. I
doubt he wants to do shovin
+1
Robert and Me are also fixing some inconsistencies with numerics and doc-values.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
>
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>> I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/
>> I will update the 4.x branch now and build the first RC
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/
> I will update the 4.x branch now and build the first RC
There are quite a few people still finishing things up for 4
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> dude you had 12 days since rob send the note to the list. what are you
> talking about?
What are you talking about? It has not been 12 days.
- mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
I thought I had two weeks, so that's what I planned on. I figured that if
someone else pick up the baton first, they would actually be decent and give a
day or two notice.
I didn't go, oh, Rob said two weeks, but some dude might just say "I'm building
an RC right now!" at any moment. It's not n
dude you had 12 days since rob send the note to the list. what are you
talking about?
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Simon Willnauer
> wrote:
>
> > honestly I don't think we should push in last minute changes by saying
> "oh I will wait 2
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> honestly I don't think we should push in last minute changes by saying "oh I
> will wait 2 days" We should release early and often as we do and fixes will
> make it to the next release right next month.
Review and bug fixes are not last m
honestly I don't think we should push in last minute changes by saying "oh
I will wait 2 days" We should release early and often as we do and fixes
will make it to the next release right next month. Robert say I will do one
in the next 2 weeks unless somebody is quicker. As always folks say we
rele
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13634041#comment-13634041
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-4661:
--
I'm concerned about the empty commits opening
How about a short heads up so that people working on 4.3 issues can actually
wrap up? I know I have review I want to finish before 4.3 at least.
Robert gave a warning of 2 weeks, then less than a week later you say, I'm
rolling now? Can't we at least have a day or two notice to wrap?
- Mark
O
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
