[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5285) Solr response format should support child Docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034635#comment-14034635 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5285: I documented on the newly created page for doc transformer

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-4763) Performance issue when using group.facet=true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034610#comment-14034610 ] Steve Rowe edited comment on SOLR-4763 at 6/17/14 11:42 PM: [~t

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-4763) Performance issue when using group.facet=true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-4763: - Attachment: SOLR-4763.patch [~thirstycrow]'s patch, modified to patch trunk. I didn't get any test failur

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley resolved SOLR-6160. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.9 Assignee: David Smiley >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034577#comment-14034577 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6160: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034573#comment-14034573 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6160: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5773) Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034571#comment-14034571 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5773: - +1, its been totally bugging me how this stuff

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-6176) ElevatedMarkerFactory is not emabled by default?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6176?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-6176. Resolution: Invalid bq. ...or even be more sophisticated and have QueryElevationComponent's init method aut

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034556#comment-14034556 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6160: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5773) Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034554#comment-14034554 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-5773: -- bq. it would be great long term too if someh

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-6176) ElevatedMarkerFactory is not emabled by default?

Hoss Man created SOLR-6176: -- Summary: ElevatedMarkerFactory is not emabled by default? Key: SOLR-6176 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6176 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5773) Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-5773: - Attachment: LUCENE-5773.patch Here is a patch. It compares the output of {{SegmentReader.ramByte

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe resolved SOLR-6164. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 4.9 Assignee: Steve Rowe Comitte

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034540#comment-14034540 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6164: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5773) Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034534#comment-14034534 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5773: - +1, it would be great long term too if somehow

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034528#comment-14034528 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6164: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034513#comment-14034513 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5752: Thanks Rob. bq. concatenate: as

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5773) Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed

Adrien Grand created LUCENE-5773: Summary: Test SegmentReader.ramBytesUsed Key: LUCENE-5773 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5773 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Test

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034502#comment-14034502 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6164: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034495#comment-14034495 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6164: --- Commit 16033

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-6164: - Attachment: SOLR-6164.patch Gregory's patch with a CHANGES.txt entry; also cleaned up the test a little.

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5714) Improve tests for BBoxStrategy then port to 4x.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034453#comment-14034453 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-5714: -- Progress report: * I added an onslaught of r

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034442#comment-14034442 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-6160: That confirmation works for me. I'll commit to tr

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034433#comment-14034433 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5772: - I was thinking to create an RC on thursday, si

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-6174) Facet count incorrect when duplicate facet queries (facet.query) are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-6174: --- Comment: was deleted (was: Does using the *key* parameter ({code}facet.query={!key=one}test&facet.que

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6174) Facet count incorrect when duplicate facet queries (facet.query) are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034394#comment-14034394 ] Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-6174: Does using the *key* parameter ({code}facet.query

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.7.0) - Build # 1621 - Still Failing!

: Error Message: : posix_spawn is not a supported process launch mechanism on this platform. does anybody understand what's going on here? My mail log shows that this has happend 8 times since April 4th on policeman jenkin's MacOS builds of both trunk & 4x, using both jdk7 & jdk8 reading betw

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6160) Exception possible with group.facet, range faceting, with distributed search

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034369#comment-14034369 ] Peter Ciuffetti commented on SOLR-6160: --- Confirming that this patch has resolved the

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6174) Facet count incorrect when duplicate facet queries (facet.query) are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034362#comment-14034362 ] Scott Smerchek commented on SOLR-6174: -- It is interesting, indeed. It's not so much

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6174) Facet count incorrect when duplicate facet queries (facet.query) are specified

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034324#comment-14034324 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6174: Interesting edge case. I haven't looked closely, but this

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034245#comment-14034245 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5752: - I think the tests and docs etc look great here

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034174#comment-14034174 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-6175: - I see. I don't have a windows bo

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034170#comment-14034170 ] Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-6175: - bq. The ignoreException call cau

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034146#comment-14034146 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6175: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5772: --- Attachment: LUCENE-5772.patch Fixed silly test bug. > SortingAtomicReader should implement getSorte

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034132#comment-14034132 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-6175: - bq. I think we should also chang

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034131#comment-14034131 ] Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5772: Thanks Rob. I know you're working on 4.9 release

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034130#comment-14034130 ] Gregory Chanan commented on SOLR-6164: -- Thanks for taking a look, [~steve_rowe]. bq.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034125#comment-14034125 ] Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-6175: - Thanks Shalin. I think we shoul

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034110#comment-14034110 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6175: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034108#comment-14034108 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6175: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034103#comment-14034103 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5772: - +1, thank you Shai! > SortingAtomicReader sho

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034094#comment-14034094 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6175: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6175) DebugComponent throws NPE on shard exceptions when using shards.tolerant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034095#comment-14034095 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6175: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-5772: --- Attachment: LUCENE-5772.patch Fixed SortingAtomicReader and added relevant test. > SortingAtomicRea

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6062) Phrase queries are created for each field supplied through edismax's pf, pf2 and pf3 parameters (rather them being combined in a single dismax query)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034070#comment-14034070 ] Michael Dodsworth commented on SOLR-6062: - [~ramayer] does that output look correct

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5761) Remove DiskDocValuesFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034066#comment-14034066 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5761: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5761) Remove DiskDocValuesFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034065#comment-14034065 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5761: - Commit

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5772) SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues

Shai Erera created LUCENE-5772: -- Summary: SortingAtomicReader should implement getSortedNumericDocValues Key: LUCENE-5772 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5772 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5761) Remove DiskDocValuesFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14034063#comment-14034063 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5761: - Commit

4.9 branch

I created the branch here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_9/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5714) Improve tests for BBoxStrategy then port to 4x.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033995#comment-14033995 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5714: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6164) Copy Fields Schema additions are not distributed to other nodes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033988#comment-14033988 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-6164: -- +1, this looks great [~gchanan] - the code to update c

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033978#comment-14033978 ] Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-5770: bq. btw as i see you have this targeted at 4.10,

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033971#comment-14033971 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5770: - btw as i see you have this targeted at 4.10, i

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-6129. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 5.0 Thanks for the reminder and the patch,

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033962#comment-14033962 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6129: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033959#comment-14033959 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-6129: --- Commit 16032

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-6129: Attachment: SOLR-6129.patch I have added a simple test. > DateFormatTransformer doe

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-6129: --- Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar > DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTi

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5771) Review semantics of SpatialOperation predicates

David Smiley created LUCENE-5771: Summary: Review semantics of SpatialOperation predicates Key: LUCENE-5771 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5771 Project: Lucene - Core Issue

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6129) DateFormatTransformer doesn't resolve dateTimeFormat

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033942#comment-14033942 ] Aaron LaBella commented on SOLR-6129: - Anyone out there? This patch is ready to go --

Re: Solution to Solr Master-Slave single point of failure.

The sticky parts of that solution (off the top of my head) are > assuring that the two masters have all the updates. How do you guarantee that > the updates succeed and the two masters do, indeed, contain the exact same > information? > There'd have to be logic to insure that when the switch wa

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033934#comment-14033934 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5770: - I'm not worried about it. We should also consi

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6168) CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly when 3 or more sort params are used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Umesh Prasad updated SOLR-6168: --- Description: CollapsingQParser Plugin ranks documents incorrectly when more than 2 sort fields are us

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6168) CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly when 3 or more sort params are used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Umesh Prasad updated SOLR-6168: --- Affects Version/s: 4.8.1 > CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly when 3 or more sort params are us

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6168) CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly when 3 or more sort params are used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Umesh Prasad updated SOLR-6168: --- Attachment: (was: SOLR-6168-broken-sort-test-case.patch) > CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrect

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6168) CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly when 3 or more sort params are used

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Umesh Prasad updated SOLR-6168: --- Attachment: SOLR-6168-broken-multi-sort-test-case.patch > CollapsingQParserPlugin ranks incorrectly wh

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033854#comment-14033854 ] Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-5770: I was curious whether Java8 would reduce or elim

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033837#comment-14033837 ] Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-5770: To assess relative performance of the modified S

Re: Solution to Solr Master-Slave single point of failure.

Hello Arcadius, why not simple moving to SolrCloud that already addresses fault tolerance and high availability ? Simply imagine a configuration of : 1 shard, factor of replciation 3. And you have even a better scenario than 2 masters and 1 slave. Cheers 2014-06-17 14:43 GMT+01:00 Arcadius Ahoua

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated LUCENE-5770: --- Attachment: LUCENE-5770.patch Preliminary patch modifying the specifications for StandardTokenizer,

Solution to Solr Master-Slave single point of failure.

Hello. SolrCloud has been out for a while now. However, there are still many installations running Solr4 in the traditional master-slave setup. Currently, the Solr Master is the single point of failure of most master-slave deployment. This could be easily addressed by having : a- 2 indep

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5770) Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0

Steve Rowe created LUCENE-5770: -- Summary: Upgrade JFlex to 1.6.0 Key: LUCENE-5770 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5770 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type: Task Repor

[JENKINS] Lucene-trunk-Linux-java7-64-analyzers - Build # 7901 - Failure!

Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-trunk-Linux-java7-64-analyzers/7901/ 1 tests failed. REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChainsWithLargeStrings Error Message: startOffset must be non-negative, and endOffset must be >= startOffset, startOffset=9,endOffs

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6095) SolrCloud cluster can end up without an overseer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033734#comment-14033734 ] Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-6095: - bq. RollingRestartTest.regularRe

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-5752: --- Fix Version/s: 5.0 I'd like to commit to trunk first and let things bake for a while

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-5752: --- Attachment: LUCENE-5752.patch I think this is close to ready; here's an initial appl

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033631#comment-14033631 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5752: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033621#comment-14033621 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5752: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-5752) Explore light weight Automaton replacement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14033613#comment-14033613 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5752: - Commit