[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13437984#comment-13437984
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-502:
---
I would put it in t
In regards to the NIOFSDirectory, we have no plans on supporting it
for several reasons, the largest being that NIO (meaning New I/O) is a
java only API. I guess it would be good to briefly discuss what NIO
is in Java (anyone feel free to correct me when I inevitably get some
of the details wrong
It must be something we've missed, as we want to target medium trust
locations in the future. I can't think of anything off the top of my
head that would require medium trust, though, let alone unmanaged
code. I'll dive into this.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Simon Sve
tion that it would be slightly more stable than the current
> work-in-progress.
>
> Thanks for the quick attention and clarifications. Especially for those
> that rely upon the binary packages.
>
> - Neal
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Currens [mailto:
liar thing was that it was just building the .NET
> 3.5 version randomly instead of being an actual deliberate change. I was
> trying to think how that was possible. =)
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13417213#comment-13417213
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-421:
---
Can you reproduce
http://dotnetrdf.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/dotnetrdf/Trunk/Build/nant/dotn
> etrdf.build?revision=2252&view=markup - Look at the projectgen goals for
> invocation examples and the compile targets for invoking MSBuild on the
> end results.
>
> It may be somewhat clunky but it d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-337:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.2)
Fix Version/s
Christopher Currens created LUCENENET-495:
-
Summary: Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of
System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations
Key: LUCENENET-495
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
Mike, The codebase for lucene.net should be almost identical to java's
3.0.3 release, and LUCENE-1044 is included in that.
Itamar, are you committing the index regularly? I only ask because I can't
reproduce it myself by forcibly terminating the process while it's
indexing. I've tried both 3.0.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13291130#comment-13291130
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-467:
---
Thanks. Patch app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-487.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
I did a quick
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-445.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
I saw this fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-464.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
Fixed in trunk
I don't think you've missed anything. I pulled the changes, and everything
immediately built with no errors, and all tests passed, so it works for me
as well. Licenses are in order, I verified the eol-style, and the source
and test data all look to be in the correct places. I think that's really
To unsubscribe a different e-mail - e.g. you used to be subscribed as *
user@oldname.example* - send a message to
*list*-unsubscribe-*user=oldname.example*@apache.org(lucene-net-dev-unsubscribe-user=
oldname.exam...@apache.org)
You can do this provided you can still receive e-mails sent to the ol
; I'm going to start doing this sometime tomorrow, but my main efforts will
> be on Thursday. I can certainly use any help in dividing work etc - please
> anyone who can join on Thursday for live collaboration or later chip in the
> discussion.
>
> I'll keep you posted.
>
&g
gt;
> @Prescott any idea re " CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an
> exact port - do you remember why? "?
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's in a weird place. And for the 3.0.3 version, its easiest to f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260708#comment-13260708
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-486:
---
I think this aff
to treat it as markdown still, within certain html tags (in this case,
).
I just moved the div tag to the template.html file, and removed them from
the markdown pages.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll take a look at it
ld I persuade you to create an issue for this here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET, so that we can keep track
of the progress on it?
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Björn.
>
> So I&
Thanks Björn.
So I've compared the code with the java equivalent, and the result from
java, via running the analyzer in the QueryParser:
Field:björ*
So, it seems to have the same behavior in Java as well. I want to see if
this is a known issue or expected behavior in java, and go from there. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-485:
--
Attachment: tt.diff
The diff doesn't specify files, but should be ea
Thanks, Sylvain, for the patch.
You can create issues at our issue tracker for Lucene.Net.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET
You have a to create an account first to do it, but I've added your issue
here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-485 and assigned it
to the 3.
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
Reporter: Christopher Currens
Fix For: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
{quote}
Hi list,
I am not sure how to report bugs, or even if anybody is interested in bug
reports. However, I have been playing with lucene lately, and found out an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13253598#comment-13253598
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-446:
---
So, I've b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13253542#comment-13253542
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-470:
---
Thanks for the feed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-468.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I'm closing this as fixed. All types that impl
matter, we can remove this from the solution, we don't use the
WeakHashTable anymore in lucene.)
These should be looked into.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So for a long time, we've gotten failed tes
Andy,
I'll take a look at that today. I actually don't know how to make the
changes, but fortunately it's all documented somewhere, and I think I can
probably figure it out. However, the RC1 label was just accidentally left
in there. It *is* the official release that was voted in, we just
negle
All,
I've been thinking about the future of Lucene.NET lately, and where I want
it to be by the end of the year. So far, we've had a decent year, with two
releases, both the 2.9.4 and 2.9.4g branch, and I want to keep this release
streak going. So, how are we doing on version 3.0.3?
Surprisingl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-481:
--
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
> Port Contrib.MemoryIn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens reassigned LUCENENET-463:
-
Assignee: Christopher Currens
> Would like to be able to us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens closed LUCENENET-466.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to trunk
> optimisation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13239594#comment-13239594
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-482:
---
Yes, 2.9.2 is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-466:
--
Attachment: DIN2Stemmer.patch
Bjorn,
I've made this patch from th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens reopened LUCENENET-466:
---
I see what you're saying. I missed that in the original conversation
: Christopher Currens
We need to port MemoryIndex from contrib, if we want to be able to port a few
other contrib libraries.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-462:
--
Description:
Running a spatial query against a list of locations all within
e.Net
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Lucene.Net Core
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g, Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Reporter: Christopher Currens
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
Parts of the QueryParser class are _very_ old. I'm not sure e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13235915#comment-13235915
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-466:
---
Since both DIN-50
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens closed LUCENENET-372.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: (was: Prescott Nasser)
We&#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens closed LUCENENET-179.
-
Resolution: Invalid
It's been so long since this patch was submitted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-477.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens closed LUCENENET-465.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I can't reproduce this problem, and there&#
That largely depends on how different the 3.4/3.5 java API is from the
current version in our trunk (3.0.3). From a maintainability standpoint,
it would be easier for us to fix this bug when we've ported Lucene.NET to
the same version that java was at when it was fixed. It looks like they
added a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13228713#comment-13228713
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-167:
---
It's still on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-474.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed patch. Everything compiles and tests pass as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-54.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> ArgumentOurOfRangeException caused
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-475.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 3.0.3
This has already
: 3/1/2012 7:23 AM
> To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
>
> On 2012-02-29, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On 2012-02-28, Christopher Currens wrote:
>
> >> Alright, it's done! 3.0.3 is now merged in with Trun
my Windows Phone
> ____
> From: Christopher Currens
> Sent: 2/28/2012 10:36 AM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Merging 3.0.3 into Trunk
>
> Now that we've release 2.9.4g, are we at a point to where we can merge the
> 3.0.3 bran
ease is
> the best place to make it.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Christopher Currens
> Sent: 2/24/2012 2:45 PM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major vers
HAIII--CHAAA!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> NO SUMMIT 4 U!
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Christopher Currens
> wrote:
> > I would have loved to, especially since I'm relatively close to the
> > Microsoft campus, but I'm
I would have loved to, especially since I'm relatively close to the
Microsoft campus, but I'm not an MVP. :)
Thanks,
Christopher
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Simone Chiaretta <
simone.chiare...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> is anybody attending the MVP Summit?
> Simone
>
> --
> Simone Chiaretta
Erg. Was it related to the whole documentation thing? I'm pretty sure
it's "frowned upon" for our documentation to break SVN every time we do a
release, so we should probably figure out a solution for that. :P
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> I
I made some changes to the website in staging. Just a few things regarding
the blog list, a little bit of left padding and adding a recent news header
above it. I also changed the link style a little bit. Feel free to revert
any/all changes I've made. :)
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Feb 14, 20
Looks like the blog was successfully setup (that was quick!). You can
access it here: https://blogs.apache.org/lucenenet/
I've migrated the whopping 3 new entries we already have on our
index/front-page in the news section over to the blog. I would give a shot
at integrating it into the website
Looks great, Prescott! Thanks for getting that done.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> > even though we're not voting on this. +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Prescott Nasser >wrote:
Nice. I noticed with R# 6.1 we can share settings on a
solution/project basis along with easy import. Do you happen to have
one pre-made with the coding standards we're using, or is one already
checked into the repo, like we have with StyleCop?
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:24 A
hanges
> >> > > >>> like StopAnalyzer(List stopWords),
> >> > > >>> Query.ExtractTerms(ICollection) etc.
> >> > > >>> But I think, a drop-in replacement will work for most of the
> >> > Lucene.Net
> >>
Some fixes might already be in trunk, the 2.9.4g branch and even the 3.0.3
branch. I can tell you that the code that the 3.0.3 branch was ported from
was the downloadable source, sometime around september/october and not
directly from SVN. Assuming that Lucene's Jira is correct, then all issues
t
There are a few patches that were made for 2.9.4 between when the 3.0.3
branch was forked from trunk and now that haven't been merged in. It looks
like I branched it on Nov. 7th, so
LUCENENET-431, LUCENENET-433, LUCENENET-453, and LUCENENET-455 may or may
not be fixed, since that also largely depe
sage-
> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Re: Memory Leak in 2.9.2.2
>
> FYI, 2.9.4 can be compiled against .Net 2.0 with a few minor changes in
> CloseableThreadLocal
>
; I can send you the dll that I am using if you would like. The documents
> > are _mostly_ small documents. Emails and office docs size of plain text
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 29, 2011, Christopher Currens <
> > currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
9] arrays that I didn't know where they came from in memory.
>
> On Monday, November 28, 2011, Christopher Currens >
> wrote:
> > Hi Trevor,
> >
> > What kind of memory increase are we talking about? Also, how big are the
> > documents that you are indexi
I wanted to take some time to discuss our position on the Contrib projects.
Digy and I were a little off topic in the roadmap thread and I brought it
up. Digy mentioned he always felt that it was a "nice to have" but
not necessarily required for a release. I can't say I disagree.
I had some tim
o dive into that can proceed.
> >
> > So what are the next two major milestones? And from a higher
> > level perspective what are the major items that deem those
> > milestones complete?
> >
> > What would be the the next 3 ideal milestones after the first
> >
ch more difficult, because it's hard to
> verify that your ported code behaves the same because you can't just
> rely on the unit tests to verify your port. Therefore, it's safer to
> follow a process that requires the developer to delve deeply into the
> meaning of the c
l Dispose methods to take
> inheritance into account, etc).
>
>
> - Nick
>
>
>
> From: "Christopher Currens"
>
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 2:56 PM
>
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
>
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net]
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late
nights and gotten far more done in a week and a half than I expected. The
list of changes is very large, and fortunately, I've documented it in some
files that are in the branches root of certain projects. I'll list what
ch
We're currently working on the release of 2.9.4, and its during out release
phase that we generate the NuGet package. There was a vote to release it a
week or so ago, but some last minute changes postponed it. I'm not
personally working with the other committers who are packaging the release
for
I noticed that we have a bit of documentation in the 'site' directory of
the, and the trunk directory. Which one are we using to link to the
website, the one in trunk or the site folder? I feel that maybe we could
still keep the docs in trunk zipped for each release and tag, then extract
that to
+1
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Michael Herndon wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
> >
> > As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13141637#comment-13141637
]
Christopher Currens edited comment on LUCENENET-451 at 11/1/11 9:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens reopened LUCENENET-451:
---
Assignee: Christopher Currens (was: Prescott Nasser)
I'm reop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens reassigned LUCENENET-438:
-
Assignee: Christopher Currens
> replace java doc notation with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-425:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: On a 1.18GB index of only text:
FS Reader: 27
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13049359#comment-13049359
]
Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-425:
---
On a 1.18GB inde
All,
I've spent the past few days looking at what it would take to implement
proper streaming of data into and out of an index. Fortunately, it hasn't
proven very difficult at all, leaving me with a solution that works very
nicely. Now that I know it's possible, I wanted to discuss with the
comm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034961#comment-13034961
]
Christopher Currens commented on PYLUCENE-9:
We can close it. Thanks for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13031284#comment-13031284
]
Christopher Currens commented on PYLUCENE-9:
Hmm, the code I have is ne
I'm not sure you're issue is related to single quotes. The only characters
that need to be escaped for the QueryParser are + - ! ( ) { } [ ] ^ " ~ * ?
: \ You can do that using QueryParser.Escape(string). It's possible you it
might be related to the analyzer that you're using. In my experience,
The site does look great, I only have one concern and that is that is seems
we used bitbucket.org as our sole design inspiration. I'm concerned that it
looks *too* much like the bitbucket site and that may cause problems in the
future. I don't like having words and not backing it up without any
a
I was going to post the link that Digy posted, which suggests not to
determine a match that way. If my understanding is correct, the scores
returned for a query are relative to which documents were retrieved by the
search, in that if a document is deleted from the index, the scores will
change eve
85 matches
Mail list logo
