I back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14654 as I suggested
not long ago.
Thanks for volunteering to do the release, Chris!
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 3:02 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> I would recommend including this commit
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/86091d379820f65eec
If there's another 9.12, I'd backport this annoying bug for the ValueSource
API: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14654
I assume we're free to backport at-will just in case there is one?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 8:52 AM Mayya Sharipova
wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I have discoved a bug in the I
29, 2025 at 1:24 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> I think most of the code is currently formatted automatically anyway
> (python, java, gradle) but if it helps anybody - why not.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:09 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
>> This is an old thread bu
o handle this?
>
> David Smiley at "Fri, 31 Mar 2017 03:00:51 +" wrote:
> DS> bq. Let's make 'em uniform and argue later.
>
> DS> Agreed. I find it very annoying that the indentation on some of them
> are internally inconsistent.
>
> DS
I did this: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14433/files but using
the newer LongValuesSource API not the older ValueSource API.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 3:12 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Actually, I think all that's needed is a new ValueSource that gets the
> nor
sure about
NormValueSource's purpose and limitation to TFIDFSimilarity.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:03 PM David Smiley wrote:
> A useful relevance "feature" is the number of terms in a field in a
> document. Basically the term length discounted for overlaps, or the total
> number o
Welcome Michael!
(belated)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 3:07 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm pleased to announce that Michael Froh has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a Lucene committer.
>
> Michael, the tradition is for new committers to shortly introduce
> themselves.
>
sing. There is something similar --
NormValueSource but that yields the decoded norm, not the term length (AKA
position length), and it's limited to TFIDFSimilarity.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Was it actually only one machine that was too out-of-date?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:05 PM Christos Malliaridis
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> In consultation with David Smiley, I am planning to request an OS upgrade
> for our build nodes *lucene-solr-1* and *lucene-solr-2* on Monday
The 10x write factor is probably logs. Solr writes a lot of logs. Most
tests need very little data to write & read.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Woohoo! thanks Uwe; exciting you were able to get 2x the lifespan of
> the drives. Let's go for 4x this time!
>
> On Tue
embered past Kevin being of so helpful.
>>
>> Kevin Risden
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:14 PM David Smiley wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, I haven't seen this before:
>>>
>>> Verify...
>>>
>>> confirm all release
Hmmm, I haven't seen this before:
Verify...
confirm all releases have coverage in TestBackwardsCompatibility
find all past Lucene releases...
run TestBackwardsCompatibility..
Backcompat testing not required for release 9.9.2 because it's not
less than 8.11.4
Backcompat t
IMO the offset ordering constraint should have been a SHOULD not a MUST.
I'm not aware of any actual impact of non-ascending ordering. Where I
work, we have a fork of Lucene to modify the one-liner enforcement of the
rule. We've noticed no ill-effects. It had been like this for years, back
into
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:51 PM Michael Froh wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Great meeting you at Buzzwords last month!
Nice seeing you too!
...
> Adding an overload to IndexWriter.getReader would be pretty easy, but that
> method is package-private. The hairier part probably involves deciding which
What "composite subproject" / "included build" specifically is the
matter? Searching our build.gradle, I only see:
includeBuild("dev-tools/missing-doclet")
when searching for "includeBuild" but maybe it's other syntax too?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:01 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>
>
> I've spent so
I'm coming to this late but want to chime in to concur with most of
Dawid's responses.
I don't see why in the gradle.properties template we've messed with
the default daemon; this should purely be a personal choice and not
one where we the project need to make a strong preference for you.
On Thu,
I took a look!
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 5:51 PM 쿨해머 wrote:
>
> Hello. I have submitted a PR that allows users to decide the final sorting
> criteria for passages in the FieldHighlighter. If anyone is interested,
> please take a look. I will leave the PR link below.
>
> https://github.com/apache/
Cool Mike!
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:41 AM Michael McCandless
wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> ~1.5 years ago (August 2022) we migrated our Lucene issue tracking from Jira
> to GitHub. Thank you Tomoko for all the hard work doing such a complex,
> multi-phased, high-fidelity migration!
>
> I finally fi
nnotations.
>
> I vaguely recall option (2) was added specifically for nightlies which bumped
> the iteration multiplier - this affected tests that normally ran fairly fast
> but during nightly runs could run slower than anticipated.
>
> D.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 3:18 PM
uite=1000!
>
> takes precedence over any annotations (1 second).
>
> Dawid
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 7:53 PM David Smiley wrote:
>>
>> Looking at LuceneTestCase, I see the annotation from RandomizedTesting:
>> @TimeoutSuite(millis = 2 * TimeUnits.HOUR)
>&
higher. Not 2
hours though; individual tests needing so much should have a
TimeoutSuite applied to them.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
-
To unsubscribe,
I updated the script accordingly and I still see the problem:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.x/6008/console
+ status=0
+ ./crave pull --extra-rsync-flags ' --ignore-missing-args'
'**/build/**/test/TEST-*.xml' '**/*.events' 'heapdumps/**'
'**/hs_err_pid*'
Error: rsync: [sen
to do
the same thing (like in highlighting).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:35 PM Stefan Vodita
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I came across an interesting article [1] on patterns of code evolution. I
&g
reasons specific to the PR and be raised on the PR itself.
Afterwards, I leave it to others to move the limit with its configurability
to be enforced in a codec specific way.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:58 PM
> easily be circumvented by a user
This is a revelation to me and others, if true. Michael, please then point
to a test or code snippet that shows the Lucene user community what they
want to see so they are unblocked from their explorations of vector search.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/S
dn't checkIndex work if the dimension
*limit* is configurable? It's not checkindex's job to enforce the limit,
only to check that the data appears consistent / valid, irrespective of how
the number of dimensions came to be specified originally.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Se
Robert, I have not heard from you (or anyone) an argument against System
property based configurability (as I described in Option 4 via a System
property). Uwe notes wisely some care must be taken to ensure it actually
works. Sure, of course. What concerns do you have with this?
~ David Smiley
024). Your response
suggests trying to somehow perfect what the _default_ limit should be, but
I've not seen an argument _against_ configurability. Especially in this
way -- a toggle that doesn't bind Lucene's APIs in any way.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
h
Thank you Bruno! Glad to see Greg take the chair!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 12:15 PM Bruno Roustant wrote:
> Hello Lucene developers,
>
> Lucene Program Management Committee has elected a new ch
ducibility.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 4:27 PM Gus Heck wrote:
> Some discussion on https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12096 lead to
> the question of whether or not reproducible builds (
> h
Hello Zachariah,
You have sent this to the wrong list. This is the Lucene dev list. Your
message should go to d...@solr.apache.org
The Lucene & Solr projects have split; not long ago, this would have been
the right list.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
Welcome Luca!
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:04 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Luca Cavanna has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> Luca, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
> brief bio.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
>
>
it during dev, we should still
have an env variable pointing to it?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:57 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with deleting the file, I meant the "gradle.propertie
Congrats Vigya!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:34 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Vigya Sharma has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> V
FYI I had filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-23503
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 3:54 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> searching JIRA for "slkjfdf" I found a few issues in other project
I suppose someone bent on not using GitHub could also email the patch to
the dev list, starting a thread around it.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 9:14 AM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com>
s say Lucene 11. At
that point if there's an older issue of resumed interest, which would be
getting increasingly rare, someone could manually copy the original
description and title into GitHub plus a historical reference back. Again
-- rare by then.
~ David Smiley
Apache Luc
Welcome Greg!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 2:44 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Greg Miller has accepted an invitation to
> join the Lucene PMC!
>
> Congratulations
I merged SOLR-16227 to main, 9, 8.11 some minutes ago.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 1:59 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> Yes, please fix and backport SOLR-16227, it looks almost ready from the
> conversation on
Welcome Lu!
Welcome Chris!
+1 Approve (PMC)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:40 AM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub
> issue from Jira.
> It&#
Is anyone familiar with using GitHub (or maybe GitLab I suppose) for
tracking metadata about the issue -- something JIRA excels at? For example
the version of our project that a given PR is released in -- aka the JIRA
"Fix Version"?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Deve
Thanks for your service Michael and congrats Bruno!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 9:03 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Hello, Lucene developers. Lucene Program Management Committee has
> elected a new
Congrats and welcome!
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:09 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Guo Feng has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> Feng, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a
> brief bio.
>
> Congratulations and welcome!
>
are
omitted yet the many older ones exist.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:01 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Dawid,
>
> I did mean that we should be pushing the tags as well as their associated
> comm
I wouldn't have thought to do such a change in a minor release, but I
suppose for tests it's fine.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
> TortoiseGit's Viewer
I like the idea of using our Wiki more as you describe.Not so much
*new* news entries because I think search-ability of these CVEs is fine to
an existing entry.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 4:39 PM Gus
Congratulations Haoyu!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 4:12 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Please welcome Haoyu Zhai as the latest Lucene committer. You may also
> know Haoyu as Patri
+1
SUCCESS! [1:27:33.004868]
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:17 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I think ASF allows exception to the 72h voting rule for urgent fixes. The
> current vote result is 7 "+1&
Looks good; thanks Jan!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 9:34 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Including Lucene dev as well.
>
> As I see no Lucene level bug fixes for 8.11.1, I have prepared an "em
I prefer to not auto-close anything. An issue that's open forever doesn't
seem to be harmful. That said, I don't feel strongly enough to veto
whatever the consensus is. I love the bulk-comment proposal!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/
Welcome Julie!--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
+1 to “leave the door open” despite it seeming an awkward endeavor.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:15 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since there is no concrete design available for that as of today, that's
> why I mentioned about "keeping the door open" for 8.12. I'm n
+1
SUCCESS! [0:57:23.948714]
s
approach doesn't prevent us from fully-committing to JDK 17 for Lucene 10
if we want. When we consider that Lucene is a library and not a full app,
we should be somewhat conservative here.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Nov
I think build & distribution oriented efforts shouldn't be held up by a
feature-freeze. FF is more for getting stability on runtime code. But
this is Adrien's call.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Oct 29, 2
+1 Adrien. Thanks for moving things along.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> For visibility, I recently opened a new issue about a case of index
> corruption
Welcome Michael Gibney! It's about time :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 9:34 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Please welcome Michael Gibney as the latest Lucene committer. Mich
Agreed Walter. At least it's better than before.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:09 AM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> it seems odd too start with a statement that there is a mailing list
> without a
tiny bit and it's annoying to back-port to yet another branch
when there are last-minute fixes.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:53 AM Timothy Potter wrote:
> That's the process I've been foll
The release branch separate from cutting the RC used to be quite normal;
not exceptional. We should continue the practice for release stability.
It also gives clarity for those of us like me that have something ready-ish
to merge on which 8x version it should go into.
~ David Smiley
Apache
Yes, simply delete it, I think.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:56 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> oops, sorry, i mixed up the "origin"
here:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/main/lucene/spatial-extras/src/java/org/apache/lucene/spatial/composite/IntersectsRPTVerifyQuery.java
Only some "shapes" that are at the border of the query shape will require
the potentially expensive DocValues lookup.
~ David Smiley
Apache L
There are also deprecations to remove:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 2:43 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> Looks like just LUCENE-9334 remains?
>
> On Wed, Apr
Welcome Mayya!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:17 AM Robert Muir wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Mayya has accepted an invitation to join
> the Lucene PMC!
>
> Congratulations, and we
x all our modules at this layer.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:41 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> We can have modules, but why do they need to be in an additional folder
> deep? Why not just have langid next to
n of what "module"
is? I believe most of us would be happy to move away from "contrib"
wording, anyway.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:03 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> I think related to th
I believe we can do a fair amount of re-organization pertaining to Jetty
without losing the Jetty configuration that I think is valuable to users
who want to tweak something.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 8:01
Bumping this conversation up, based on recent communication. I have yet to
take action but really any of us can.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:48 AM David Smiley wrote:
> I'll proceed on this w
I reviewed and merged it to the relevant branches. Thanks for your
patience Mayya!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:44 AM Thomas Wöckinger
wrote:
> I already fixed it, I hope David can review it as soon
+1 to Jan's comment; no need to hold up the release.
I also think we should be open to more releases in the future for 8.x.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:55 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Let's no
Uh; I mean, "Congratulations and Welcome Greg" LOL sorry
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 5:24 PM David Smiley wrote:
> Congrats and welcome Mike!
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene
Congrats and welcome Mike!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:47 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Greg Miller has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to become a committe
SOLR-15412 is rather serious as the title suggests. I haven't been
tracking the progress so if it's already resolved, that's unknown to me and
isn't reflected in JIRA.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, May
Sounds like this would be a good addition to /dev-docs/...
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:56 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Thank for this tipp! Helps for Solr, too. I was giving up because it
> always wan
DISI, but we don't actually know if
> that's true right now.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 8:41 AM David Smiley wrote:
> >
> > Instead of a Collector, why isn't this a TwoPhaseIterator with a high
> matchCost?
> >
> > ~ David S
Instead of a Collector, why isn't this a TwoPhaseIterator with a high
matchCost?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:43 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> Thanks Adrien, that is something like what I had in mind
is is easy then great! If it isn't, then
no worries -- I could perform some manual steps and deploy to
http://home.apache.org/~dsmiley/ instead.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
Welcome Zach!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:14 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Zach Chen has accepted the PMC's invitation
> to become a committer.
>
> Zach, the
Welcome Peter!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:48 PM Robert Muir wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Peter Gromov has accepted the PMC's
> invitation to become a committer.
>
> Peter,
+1 Certainly; shouldn't be controversial at all?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:02 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> +1 it would be nice to be able to sort these out differently with filters
>
>
Nice post -- this work item was definitely a big collaboration!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:40 AM Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I just published
rue as well.
Having tags for actual releases (e.g. for 8.8, 8.7, etc.) is great for
doing quick IDE comparisons to see how code changed.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:50 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Welcome Bruno!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:56 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Bruno has accepted an invitation to join the
> Lucene PMC!
>
> Congratulations, and we
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:17 PM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> ...People work on their local repos these days anyway, it's
> not like everyone pollutes the same workspace.
>
I very much concur. When I got started with git, I treated it closer to
what I was previously more familiar with and created branch
Thank *you* Dawid! You and Jan have been big heroes of this transition!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:36 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> Thank you everyone for the collective effort to clean up stale proj
s for
future releases (e.g. for a vulnerability).
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:58 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Made a branch in my normal repo:
> https://github.com/cominvent/lucene-solr/tree/silly-pr and spun i
Just a reminder that Solr development discussions have moved to
d...@solr.apache.org. I sent a message there yesterday about tracing.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
ore the split so we all have guidance on how to
do this without all of us trying to redundantly figure it out at the same
time.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:43 PM David Smiley wrote:
> One of us will get
he" but I might
first rename it to "apache_pre9". I am not yet sure if I will use another
worktree for the new Lucene repo or if I'll do a new clone.
I think there's a case to be made for the Lucene repo to rewrite history to
remove Solr.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Sea
Is Solr ready? Where will Solr get the Lucene binaries?
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:53 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are 324 open PRs. Some numbers:
> Number updated last month: 40
I filed an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15223
"Deprecate HttpSolrClient, mark httpcomponents dep as "optional" in SolrJ"
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:45 PM Jan Høydahl
An even smaller baby step is to mark the httpclient dependency as
"optional" in the Maven pom we generate. This is a clue to consumers to
move on.
Also marking HttpSolrClient deprecated.
~ David
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:06 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> Oh I see; there are entan
ation, and shear mental
overhead of what's going on.
~ David
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 8:55 AM Noble Paul wrote:
> +1 @David Smiley
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 4:07 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we need them for kerberos? I'm totally fine getting r
+1 to remove.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 4:03 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi
>
> The general@ list is not being used for practically anything. I see some
> user questions there and we announce rele
appear on every return (e.g. due to a
cookie)? I imagine we will stop doing this in a year or maybe sooner.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:03 PM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> I clicked around a bit; didn't
The corresponding docker image has been released as well:
https://hub.docker.com/_/solr
(credit to Tobias Kässmann for helping)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:39 AM Timothy Potter
wrote:
> The Lucene PMC
ndardization on with!
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 7:50 AM Mark Miller wrote:
> I hope that doesn’t sound too negative, “clinging” never sounds as
> positive as I’d like and I do negative plenty well without d
Thanks for the background on that. I suspected it was a new feature.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 5:02 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> This feature was added to Gradle 6.2, which wasn't available when we fir
1 - 100 of 6865 matches
Mail list logo
