SOLR-15412 is rather serious as the title suggests. I haven't been tracking the progress so if it's already resolved, that's unknown to me and isn't reflected in JIRA.
~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mayya Sharipova <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > Hello everyone, > I wonder if everyone is ok for May 31st (Monday) as the date for the > feature freeze date and branch cut? > I've noticed that `releaseWizard.py` is also asking for the length of > feature freeze. What is the custom length to put there? > > Looks like Lucene > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LUCENE/versions/12349562> > doesn't have any unresolved issues for 8.9. > SOLR <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12349563> has: > - SOLR-15412 Strict validation on Replica metadata can cause complete > outage (Looks like it may be resolved already?) > - SOLR-15410 GC log is directed to console when starting Solr with Java 11 > Open J9 on Windows > - SOLR-15056 CPU circuit breaker needs to use CPU utilization, not Unix > load average > > Are we ok to postpone these issues to later releases if they are not > resolved and merged before feature freeze? > > Thank you. > > > > > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:41 PM Colvin Cowie <colvin.cowie....@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, >> Eric was going to have a look at the PR. >> But if it isn't done in time then I don't think it needs to block the >> release >> >> Thanks >> >> On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:50, Mayya Sharipova >> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Hello Colvin, >>> I am wondering if you still want to merge SOLR-15410 for the Lucene/Solr >>> 8.9 release? >>> Should we have a deadline for feature freeze? Say May 30th (Sunday)? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:30 PM Colvin Cowie < >>>> colvin.cowie....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hello, >>>> > >>>> > I raised SOLR-15410 yesterday with a PR to fix an issue with GC >>>> logging when using new versions of OpenJ9. It's small, so if somebody could >>>> have a look at it in time for 8.9 that would be great >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Colvin >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 17:52, Nhat Nguyen >>>> > <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi Mayya, >>>> >> >>>> >> I would like to backport LUCENE-9935, which enables bulk-merge for >>>> stored fields with index sort, to 8.x this weekend. The patch is ready, but >>>> we prefer to give CI some cycles before backporting. Please let me know if >>>> it's okay with the release plan. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> Nhat >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:44 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Perhaps https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15378 should be >>>> investigated before 8.9, maybe make it a blocker? >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:35 AM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mayya, I created backport for Adrien's issue here, to try to help >>>> out: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Personally, I felt that merging non-trivial changes from main >>>> branch >>>> >>>> to 8.x has some additional risks when cherry-picking: >>>> >>>> * structural changes in main branch making merging more difficult >>>> >>>> (e.g. LUCENE-9705 reorganization of codec versioning, great change >>>> >>>> moving forwards though) >>>> >>>> * there are many style changes due to spotless in main branch which >>>> >>>> add noise to merging against old code. >>>> >>>> * In the specific case of LUCENE-9827, the usual additional tricky >>>> >>>> backwards compatibility for 8.x must be added in the backport (due >>>> to >>>> >>>> minor version bumps there) which can go wrong. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I still think that particular change is worth considering for 8.9, >>>> it >>>> >>>> isn't just a performance bug but also a huge improvement to test >>>> >>>> coverage that helps combat risks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> But we should still take some precautions when releasing an 8.x >>>> IMO: >>>> >>>> * be mindful of what we are backporting and the risks involved: it >>>> is harder. >>>> >>>> * try to let jenkins bake changes in 8.x branches for longer than >>>> >>>> usual? even a few days really helps. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 1:29 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>> >>>> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Thanks everyone, >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Adrien, I am happy to try to be a release manager for this >>>> release. >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > Adrien, and Gus, please let me know when your changes are merged >>>> to 8.x >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > >>>> >>>> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:38 AM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> I'm also looking to find time to get >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14597 into some sort of 8x. >>>> I've recently completed the back port of 2/3 of the lucene tickets that are >>>> related, and hope to work on the third tomorrow.... >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> I had some feedback there, but I think folks were waiting for >>>> the version integrated with the final form of the Lucene tickets before >>>> delving further. Hopefully this week I can start on a patch that does that. >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:25 AM Adrien Grand < >>>> jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> I would like to backport LUCENE-9827 before we release 8.9, a >>>> performance regression to stored fields merges. I'll work on this as soon >>>> as possible. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:28 PM Adrien Grand < >>>> jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mayya, are you volunteering to be the release manager? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le jeu. 6 mai 2021 à 18:06, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:50 PM Mayya Sharipova < >>>> mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> >>>>>> I was wondering if we can have a 8.9.0 release. It has been >>>> more than 3 months since 8.8.0 was released. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> 8.9.0 doesn't need to be the last release in the 8.x series. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>>> >>> Adrien >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >> -- >>>> >>>> >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> >>>> >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>> >>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>> Noble Paul >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>>
