[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001457#comment-13001457
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2385:
---
I did consider them, but since we are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2398:
--
Affects Version/s: 3.1
> velocity / Solritas is throwing NumberFormatException if using Ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-2398:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> velocity / Solritas is throwing NumberFormatException
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001430#comment-13001430
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2385:
---
Hey Jan,
Thanks for kicking this off
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-2385:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Backport latest /browse improvements to branch
fects Versions: 3.0.3, 4.0
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Minor
In looking at using the surround queries with Solr, I am hitting issues caused
by collisions due to equals/hashcode not being implemented on the anonymous
inner classes that are created by things like Distance
I've been looking into the surround query parser and it's query implementations
and am having issues that seem to point to improper hashcode/equals
implementations for the anonymous inner classes that actually create a real
Query object. For instance, lines 76-88 in DistanceQuery (branch 3.x).
;> -
>>>
>>> Key: SOLR-1581
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581
>>> Project: Solr
>>>Issue Type: New Feature
>>> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996164#comment-12996164
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2366:
---
Hoss, I can live with ranges. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996032#comment-12996032
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
Another concern on this one is ho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995994#comment-12995994
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
bq. This is sort of analogous to rang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1581:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1581.patch
Totally non function, mostly just putting it up to take it off my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995915#comment-12995915
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
I've been digging into this a bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995894#comment-12995894
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
Here's a cool side effect of this
Upgrade Solr to Tika 0.9
Key: SOLR-2372
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2372
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Trivial
as the title
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2371:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2371.patch
adds min, fixes max
> Add a min() function query, upgrade
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
There doesn't appear to be a min() function. Also, max() only allows a value
source and a constant b/c it is from before we had more flexible parsing.
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995846#comment-12995846
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
bq. could probably reuse the sort par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995844#comment-12995844
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-385:
--
To make this slightly more generic, I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995843#comment-12995843
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2366:
---
{quote}Just throwing it out there... bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995652#comment-12995652
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2366:
---
bq. it just seems like a more confusing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2366:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2366.patch
Added more tests, cleaned up the patch, all tests pass. I think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2366:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2366.patch
Adds variable width gap capabilities and some tests. Still needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12995290#comment-12995290
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2366:
---
Note, also, the proposed syntax is ju
Facet Range Gaps
Key: SOLR-2366
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2366
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994828#comment-12994828
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
actually, in looking at this, we don&#x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994774#comment-12994774
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1581:
---
I would agree it relates to SOLR-1240.
On Feb 12, 2011, at 7:38 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote:
>
> One that comes to mind (and to several others I know) is SOLR-1709
> Distributed date faceting. This has had working code for a long time, though
> admittedly not a proper patch nor tests. That issue sorely needs to get
> committe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-2187.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
> Provide more DirectoryFactory implementati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994080#comment-12994080
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2187:
---
Done. Committed revision 107
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994075#comment-12994075
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2187:
---
Looks like this one just needs a merg
: Improvement
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
It is often useful to be able to restrict down the results of auto suggest,
spell checking, term components to only show results that are in documents that
are in a filter. For instance, in multitenant solutions, it is common to mix
content from multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992691#comment-12992691
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1942:
---
FWIW, I like the syntax of the schema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992690#comment-12992690
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1942:
---
Hey Simon,
Any progress on this? S
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
> in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
> on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length the
> list of issues in J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990530#comment-12990530
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2143:
---
Looks pretty good. I think it might
+1 to the bigger idea and +1 to releasing both at the same time.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>> Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
>> both?
>
> Both: because our development is merged,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-2143:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Add OpenSearch resources to the bundled exam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990191#comment-12990191
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2345:
---
Hi Bill,
Can you clarify what you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12989917#comment-12989917
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
bq. And it's finally sing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12989917#comment-12989917
]
Grant Ingersoll edited comment on LUCENE-2878 at 2/3/11 12:2
It might be worth noting that Freebase publishes a Text only extract of
Wikipedia: http://download.freebase.com/wex/latest/ We could take a snapshot
of that and host it somewhere as the new standard for benchmarking.
On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:20 PM, mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mikemcca
gt;>> provide the scientific community with an even more useful research aid,
>>> while regular users could benefit from superior ranking results.
>>>
>>> Please let me know your opinion about this proposal.
>
> -
> T
ery() throws Exception {
>> +
>> +return parser.parse("" + English.longToEnglish(getNextCounter()) + "");
>> + }
>> +
>> + private synchronized long getNextCounter() {
>> +if (counter == Long.MAX_VALUE){
>> + counter = Long.MIN_VALUE + 10;
>> +}
>> +return cou
: Analysis
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
Priority: Minor
Now that OpenNLP is an ASF project and has a nice license, it would be nice to
have a submodule (under analysis) that exposed capabilities for it. Drew
Farris, Tom Morton and I have code that does:
* Sentence Detection as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll closed SOLR-717.
Resolution: Duplicate
SOLR-2061 should take care of this
> Distribute Solr test jar so test c
I think this is akin to what some other projects do to automatically apply
patches and validate whether they apply or not. I've always wanted such a
system for Lucene, but never had the time to hook it together. I wish Hudson
had a JIRA plugin that did it automatically (or maybe there is and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987604#action_12987604
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2883:
-
bq. Does that make sense?
I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987582#action_12987582
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2883:
-
bq. I thought this was unders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987568#action_12987568
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2609:
-
Sounds good. I think we can make
On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Shai Erera (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987514#action_12987514
> ]
>
> Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2609:
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987549#action_12987549
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2883:
-
I think it makes sense to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987513#action_12987513
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2609:
-
bq. Hard to break what?
I just m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987508#action_12987508
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2609:
-
Mostly, I think I need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-2609.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
> Generate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll closed LUCENE-805.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> New Lucene Demo
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-2177.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Add More Facet demonstrations to the /browse exam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-2171.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
See SOLR-1298
> Using stats feature over a function, Funct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986584#action_12986584
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-445:
--
Oh, one other thing. You don't need t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986581#action_12986581
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-445:
--
This patch looks pretty reasonable from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved SOLR-482.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
committed on trunk and 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-482:
-
Attachment: SOLR-482.patch
Working through some old patches, this one is pretty tame and gives a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-445:
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll (was: Erick Erickson)
> XmlUpdateRequestHandler bad documents
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986442#action_12986442
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
I haven't looked at the patch
+1 Makes sense to me.
On Jan 24, 2011, at 4:07 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> Few days ago Robert and I discussed this matter over IRC and thought it's
> something we should bring forward to the list. This issue arise due to recent
> index format change introduced in LUCENE-2720, and the inte
-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@luce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983768#action_12983768
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2657:
-
Here's my suggestion: Let&
On Jan 18, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> It's just software and we have people willing to maintain the Maven stuff.
>> I simply don't get what the big deal is in keeping something that pe
On Jan 18, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>> In other words, I don't see consensus for dropping it. When you have it,
>> get back to me.
>
> Thats not how things are "added" to the
On Jan 18, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
>>
>>> I can't help but remind myself, this is the same argument Oracle
>>&
On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I can't help but remind myself, this is the same argument Oracle
> offered up for the whole reason hudson debacle
> (http://hudson-labs.org/content/whos-driving-thing)
>
> Declaring that I have a secret pocket of users that want XYZ isn't
> ope
On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I still don't see why you care so much. You have people willing to maintain
>> it and it is no sweat off your back and it is used by a pretty large chunk
&g
I still don't see why you care so much. You have people willing to maintain it
and it is no sweat off your back and it is used by a pretty large chunk of
downstream users. And don't tell me it is what holds up releases b/c it simply
isn't true.
On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
we would only
> slow down development.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980180#action_12980180
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-830:
Continuing a thread from IRC...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980156#action_12980156
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2846:
-
I get the comparison to omitTF,
On Jan 10, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> hey,
>
> today I came across function query in lucene and that reminded me that
> Solr is already using its own derived version which is no good IMO. We
> should try to consolidate the two version and make solr use the
> consolidated version
t;> ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL HSQL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, HSQLDB.ORG,
>> OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,
>> EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
>> PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>> LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR
The weird thing is, all of our collectors, IMO, are optimized for the
non-paging scenario, when I would venture to guess that the very large majority
of users out there do paging. AFAICT, about the only people who don't do
paging are those who do deep, downstream analysis which requires them to
On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. wrote:
>> Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler
>> (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited
>> and I like that it inclu
Kind of a nit-pick, but I don't think this needs to be limited to just
geographical search. We actually have clients who use the spatial filtering in
non-lat/lon uses (and it was designed with such in mind, hence the support for
n-dimensional distance calculations). Perhaps we should leave it
ommitters are needed to for incubation. Who else is willing to be
>> a committer?
>>>
>>> Grant I will definitely be taking you up on your offer to help on bring
>> Lucene.Net into incubation.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> -Origi
it might have been fixed in 3.2 and 4.1, but 4.0
> might still have it. (that scenerio has always been possible with our
> point releases, but with the multiple active branches the frequency of
> that scenerio is going to skyrocket)
>
>
> -Hoss
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
I don't think they are all the same, at least not in trunk. I believe there
are a few near San Fran, some near Buffalo, MN (my hometown ;-) ), and some in
Oklahoma. You can see this when you hit the /browse url.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> The example docs we distri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-2268:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2268.patch
This patch should in no way shape or form be seen as useful at this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971524#action_12971524
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2268:
---
Useful link on the algorithms:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971322#action_12971322
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1979:
---
bq. What about leveraging payloads (we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970892#action_12970892
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
bq. Other libraries likely pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970885#action_12970885
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
bq. I haven't had this e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970876#action_12970876
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
bq. If people see compression in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970868#action_12970868
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
{quote}
Providing a "genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970864#action_12970864
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
bq. I think though we'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-2810:
Summary: Explore Alternate Stored Field approaches for highly redundant
data (was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970862#action_12970862
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
Compression 1.0 was a different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970852#action_12970852
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-
bq. I think Grant was looking
Stored Fields Compression
-
Key: LUCENE-2810
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Store
Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 8, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
> ***
>
> ...my vote is to start having CHANGES.txt focus solely on the changes
> commited to the branches that lead to that release (so 4.1.1's CHANGES.txt
> will list 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, and 4.2.1 - but not 3.1, or 4.1.1) but i could
> als
George and Community,
I need the .NET Board Report update by tomorrow.
-Grant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12968777#action_12968777
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1979:
---
Sorry, you are right. See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12968757#action_12968757
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1979:
---
Have a look at http://tika.apache.org
701 - 800 of 1213 matches
Mail list logo
