Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

hi, If we are going to respin I would like to consider this PR https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13877 which is a forward port of a change we did in 9.11.1 which has arised after we reverted https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13857. The change is straightforward so I don't think there is an

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.0 RC2

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:09:46.441375] On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 8:43 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:51:16.934304] > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:57 AM Chris Hegarty > wrote: >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.12.0 >> >> This build includes the bwc stu

Re: Welcome Armin Braun as Lucene comitter

Welcome Armin! On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:16 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > > Welcome Armin! > > -Chris. > > > On 26 Jul 2024, at 05:24, Anshum Gupta wrote: > > > > Congratulations and welcome, Armin! > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 2:10 AM Luca Cavanna wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Armin

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.11.1 released

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.11.1. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform. This

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 11 (11 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:29 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.11.1 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

jdk19 >> Java 20 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/64bit/hotspot/latest-jdk20 >> Java 21 JAVA_HOME=/home/jenkins/tools/java/64bit/hotspot/latest-jdk21 >> >> Logfile is here: >> https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/34/console >> >> SU

Re: Bugfix release 9.11.1

>> [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13494 >> >> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 08:36, Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_11. I am >>> planning to build the RC next Monday. >>> >>>

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.11.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.11.1-RC1-rev-0c087dfdd10e0f6f3f6faecc6af4415e671a9e69 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smoke

Re: Bugfix release 9.11.1

branch_9_11. Can't > remember what changes.txt policy is - do we copy the entire section for > 9.11 once it's cut back to main/ 9x? > > Dawid > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:41 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Stefan sounds good. >> >> Sure Dawid. Thanks for movi

Re: Bugfix release 9.11.1

5 > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:37 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_11. I am >> planning to build the RC next Monday. >> >> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: >> >&

Bugfix release 9.11.1

I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_11. I am planning to build the RC next Monday. Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. *

Re: Do we need a 9.11.1 release?

Hi Stefan, Yes, I think we need a 9.11.1 release. There are a couple more bugs that we might want to fix. The first one is a performance regression due to an expensive operation added on NumericComaprator [1]. In addition there is another one I would like to address when an IndexWriter loses the

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1 On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:34 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 8:54 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:54 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > Uwe >> > >> > Am 23.02.2024 um 12:24 schrieb Chris Hegarty: >> > > Hi, >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:54:32.772088] On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 11:23 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to release. > > Tested smoketester with Java 11 and 17; results: > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/31/console > > Uwe > > Am 25.01.2024 um 12:57 schrieb Chris Hegarty: > > Pleas

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC2

SUCCESS! [1:20:23.570231] +1 On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:55 AM Shyamsunder Mutcha wrote: > SUCCESS! [0:38:41.054860] > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 9:59 PM Nhat Nguyen > wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [1:22:43.808415] >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 6:09 PM Christian Moen wrote: >> >>> SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC1

SUCCESS! [0:52:59.891964] +1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 12:42 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 to release. > > I hit a corner-case test failure and opened a PR to fix it: > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12859 > > I don't think this should block the release? --

Re: Welcome Patrick Zhai to the Lucene PMC

Welcome Patrick! On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 3:29 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Welcome Patrick! > > Uwe > > > Am 10. November 2023 21:04:32 MEZ schrieb Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com>: > >> I'm happy to announce that Patrick Zhai has accepted an invitation to >> join the Lucene Projec

Re: Lucene 9.7 release

+1 On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 6:20 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > +1 > Thanks Adrien > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 9:19 AM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1, thanks Adrien! >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 12:11

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.6.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:42:35.102645] On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:45 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.6.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.6.0-RC2-rev-f94cd1750d198cd0294fb1d967c4e511a7035f1e > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.6.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [2:07:32.970671] On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:08 AM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > +1. Thanks Alan! > > SUCCESS! [0:48:46.465752] > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:33 AM Alan Woodward > wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.6.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>

Re: Lucene 9.6 release

+1 Thanks Alan! On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 1:27 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Hi all, > > It’s been a while since our last release, and we have a number of nice > improvements and optimisations sitting in the 9x branch. I propose that we > start the process for a 9.6 release, and I will volunteer to

Re: Welcome Ben Trent as Lucene committer

Congratulations Ben! On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:08 PM Luca Cavanna wrote: > Welcome Ben, congratulations! > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 4:27 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Welcome and congratulations, Ben! >> >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 8:48 PM Adrien Grand wrote

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:44:15.998020] On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 9:19 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:36:32.191785] > > Jan > > 25. jan. 2023 kl. 19:43 skrev Luca Cavanna : > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.5.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.

Re: Lucene 9.5.0 release

+1 On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:58 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > +1, thanks Luca! > > On 13 Jan 2023, at 09:54, Luca Cavanna wrote: > > Hi all, > I'd like to propose that we release Lucene 9.5.0. There is a decent amount > of changes that would go into it looking at the github milestone: > https://gi

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.2 RC1

SUCCESS! [0:46:39.842784] +1 On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:18 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.2-RC1-rev-858d9b437047a577fa9457089afff43eefa461db > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.4.1 released

#x27;s Lucene homepage. > > Uwe > > Am 24.10.2022 um 14:30 schrieb Ignacio Vera: > > The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.4.1. > > > Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library > written entirely in Java. It i

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.4 - Build # 509 - Failure!

wrote: > > What's weird is that tidy should have been called from within the release > wizard - it was added in this issue. > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11748 > > Have I missed something obvious here? > > Dawid > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM Ig

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.4 - Build # 509 - Failure!

I pushed a fix for this spotless error. On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 4:17 PM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.4/509/ > > All tests passed > > Build Log: > [...truncated 1292 lines...] > BUILD FAILED in 19m 30s

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.4.1 released

The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.4.1. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires structured search, full-text search, faceting, nearest-

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

I push the following commit to the lucene-site which seems to fix the issue. New versions of Markdown seem to break the build. https://github.com/apache/lucene-site/commit/dc74048f65395ce853a7d93d9b4750db073973df On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:19 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Hello, > > I am

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

uld not process core/core_news/2020-03-24-8-5-0-available.md | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info' ERROR: Could not process core/core_news/2020-10-07-8-6-3-available.md | module 'markdown' has no attribute 'version_info' Thanks, Ignacio

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.1 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 6 (6 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.1 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.1 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.1-RC1-rev-810817993e0956e63e29906e78a245949501b77d You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTe

Re: Bugfix release Lucene 9.4.1

Hello, I spoke with Julie and I agree to take over the release manager duties for this release. I will shortly astart the vote. In the meanwhile, here are the release notes that Julie had already prepared for review: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.4.1 On Wed,

Re: Welcome Luca Cavanna as Lucene committer

Welcome Luca! On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:31 AM Bruno Roustant wrote: > Welcome! > > Le jeu. 6 oct. 2022 à 11:20, Michael Sokolov a > écrit : > >> Welcome Luca! >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022, 1:05 AM 陆徐刚 wrote: >> >>> Welcome！ >>> >>> Xugang >>> >>> https://github.com/LuXugang >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2022

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC3

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:53:18.788514] On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 6:50 AM Patrick Zhai wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:57:17.821452] > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:32 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1, smoke tester: >> >> SUCCESS! [0:26:01.696388] >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

r wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I also added the small build system changes and the localSettings fix > for Smoketester to make Robert happy with validating release :-) > > > > Uwe > > > > Am 27.09.2022 um 10:59 schrieb Ignacio Vera: > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

some small build system fixes like support >> for Eclipse and Smoketester bootup (regarding MR-JAR) also to the 9.4 >> branch. But that's not urgent. >> >> Uwe >> Am 27.09.2022 um 10:01 schrieb Ignacio Vera: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just noticed an

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC2

Hi, I just noticed an important regression on polygon queries using the LatLonPoint field, see https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11824. It feels like an important regression so it might be worth a respinning. Sorry about that. On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 10:30 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 (b

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.4.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949] On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017] > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391] >> >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mik

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.3 - Build # 72 - Failure!

I fixed this. The script that adds new versions to addVersions.java is generating code that makes spotless nhappy. On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 3:36 PM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.3/72/ > > All tests pass

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.3.0 released

29 July 2022 - Apache Lucene™ 9.3.0 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.3.0. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires structure

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

iled to check? > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/18/console > Am 25.07.2022 um 13:12 schrieb Ignacio Vera: > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.3.0 > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 7 (6 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED

Re: Welcome Vigya Sharma as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome Vigya! On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:34 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Vigya Sharma has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Vigya, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a > brief bio. > > Congratulatio

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

Thanks Adrien! It sounds much more exciting indeed. On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:35 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Thanks Ignacio! I tried to iterate on some release highlights to make them > sound more exciting. > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:05 PM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> Ignacio

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

Ignacio Vera Jul 20, 2022, 1:41 PM (5 days ago) to dev Adrien told me that I sent the wrong link, I thought I could share the draft before publishing. Here the draft for the release highlights. I have probably missed things that should be included so please feel free to add them. https

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.3.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.3.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d25cebcef7a80369f4dfb9285ca7360a810b75dc You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTe

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

9.3 until it > proves more stable. Apologies. > > Cheers, > -Greg > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 7:59 AM Greg Miller wrote: > > > > Ack, thanks Ignacio for the quick approval. Just merged the fix onto > > the 9.3 branch. > > > > Cheers, > > -Greg &

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

ent about LUCENE-10592, it's also a >>>>>> big change, maybe we should not even try to get it in before cutting the >>>>>> branch? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 4:09 PM Mayya Sharipova >>>>>> wrot

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

t; Cheers, > -Greg > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:42 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have probably > missed things that should be included so please feel free to add them. > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

Please find here the draft for the release highlights. I have probably missed things that should be included so please feel free to add them. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=217391905 On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:17 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > NOT

New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.3.0

NOTICE: Branch branch_9_3 has been cut and versions updated to 9.4 on stable branch. Please observe the normal rules: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit a

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

nice feature > for enabling facets and aggregations over XYShape and LatLonShape field > types and could make for a good 9.3 geo highlight. > > Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > Principal Engineer - Search | Amazon > Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > nkn...@apache.org &

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

NE-10592 is also baking and > has a PR that seems to be progressing rapidly. > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:03 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating a > good bunch of new features

Lucene 9.3.0 release

Hello! Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating a good bunch of new features, optimizations and bug fixes. Would there be support for releasing Lucene 9.3 soon? I am happy being the release manager.

Re: Welcome Greg Miller to the Lucene PMC

Welcome Greg! On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 1:40 PM 陆徐刚 wrote: > Congratulations, Greg. > > Xugang > > > 在 2022年6月7日，17:48，Dawid Weiss 写道： > > > > Congratulations and welcome, Greg. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@luce

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

+1 Thanks Alan! > On 3. May 2022, at 13:01, Alan Woodward wrote: > > Hi all, > > It’s been six weeks or so since we released 9.1, and we have a bunch of nice > new features and enhancements piling up in the 9.x branch. I’d like to > volunteer to be a release manager for a 9.2 release. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.1.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [1:08:44.248804] On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:08 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > > > the test also failed several times in usual Jenkins jobs (see builds@lao > list). Looks like a problem with the test or some wrong assumption or some > missing synchronized block (the Policeman Jenk

Re: Lucene 9.1 release soon?

+1 On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 9:05 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 8:43 AM Michael Wechner > wrote: > > > > I think this would be great :-) thank you very much for your efforts! > > > > Michael > > > > Am 24.02.22 um 00:28 schrieb Julie Tibshirani: > > > Hello everyone, > >

Re: Welcome Guo Feng as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome! On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:50 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Welcome and congratulations, Feng! > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 3:40 PM Koji Sekiguchi < > koji.sekigu...@rondhuit.com> wrote: > >> Welcome, Feng! >> >> Koji >> >> >> On 2022/01

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC4

+1 SUCCESS! [0:18:22.596596] On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 12:58 AM Anshum Gupta wrote: > +1 > > Smoke tester is happy. Tried sample indexing/searching, looks good! > > SUCCESS! [0:20:22.007002] > > Thanks for your effort and patience, Adrien! > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:56 AM Adrien Grand wrote: >

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations Julie! On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 10:03 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Congratulations and welcome! > > - Alan > > > On 30 Nov 2021, at 21:49, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I'm pleased to announce that Julie Tibshirani has accepted an invitation > to join the Lucene PMC! > > > > Congratula

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [0:17:28.435474] On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:23:41.775448] > > Only ran smoketester this time. > > Jan > > > 26. nov. 2021 kl. 15:31 skrev Adrien Grand : > > > > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can b

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:28.854798] On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 1:20 PM Robert Muir wrote: > Thanks Adrien for addressing one half of the back compat problem. > > Unfortunately, the "branch_8x" branch is still live and running hot, > same as before. > So I have to again give my -1 VOTE, due to the fact tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

Your issue has not been ignored but the problem is that the version of the blocker has not been added so it doesn't appear in a search for blockers in Lucene 9 :( Do we need to discuss this again? I thought we discussed and agreed on increasing our backwards compatibility. My personal opinion is t

Re: What should we do of branch_8x?

I agree with Robert here, this makes little sense as there is no tooling in this repository to release solr without lucene. If it ever happens it will probably be done outside. The idea of "leaving a door open" has no justification because it is more "drawing a door in a wall" and might give false

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.11.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:16.453882] On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:31 AM Gus Heck wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:16.982080] > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:06 PM Mayya Sharipova > wrote: > >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:09:47.023515] >> >> On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 6:42 PM Timothy Potter >> wrote: >> >>> totally unofficial, bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:01:50.808390] On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:40 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > > SUCCESS! [0:44:35.590557] > > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 8:00 PM Mayya Sharipova wrote: > >> Please vote for rel

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

+1 On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:47 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, 20 Sep, 2021, 12:33 pm Adrien Grand, wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Jira gives the following note when opening an issue: >> >> ``` >> This project has a user mailing list and an IRC channel fo

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 2387 - Unstable!

fixed here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/123 sorry for the noise On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:12 AM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-main/2387/ > > 2 tests failed. > FAILED: > org.apache.lucene.repl

Re: Welcome Zach Chen as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome! On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 4:36 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Welcome Zach! > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:38 PM Greg Miller wrote: > >> Congrats Zach! >> >> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:09 PM Robert Muir wrote: >> > >> > Congratulations! >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 19

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 RC1

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:56:27.324736] On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 12:01 PM Bruno Roustant wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran the smoke tester successfully. > > Bruno > > Le jeu. 8 avr. 2021 à 04:38, Anshum Gupta a > écrit : > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Ran a sample indexing/search app and browsed through th

Re: Welcome Peter Gromov as Lucene committer

Welcome Peter! On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:10 PM Peter Gromov wrote: > Thanks, that helped! > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 11:23 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > >> See here - >> https://git.apache.org/setup/ >> >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:52 AM Peter Gromov >> wrote: >> > >> > I have 2FA, but nobody added m

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

rote: >> >> Hi Mike, >> >> I’d like to back port LUCENE-9744 (which fixes an NPE in intervals >> queries) and LUCENE-9762 (which fixes a bug in QueryValuesSource). >> >> Thanks, Alan >> >> On 29 Mar 2021, at 09:47, Ignacio Vera > <https://ma

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

I'd like to backport Lucene-9870 which is a bug in distance queries that causes no matches along indexed lines and polygon edges. This fix only touches one class tho so very low risk. lucene On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Mike Drob wrote: > Ishan, > > Thank you for bringing this up. I’m comfort

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 1835 - Unstable!

I open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9859 On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:04 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > This reproduces for me. I can't file a jira issue for some reason - weird. > > gradlew :lucene:core:test --tests > "org.apache.lucene.search.TestXYPointQueries.testSamePointManyTimes"

Re: Congratulations to the new Lucene PMC Chair, Michael Sokolov!

Congratulations and many many thanks! On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:46 AM Alessandro Benedetti wrote: > Congrats Michael! > -- > Alessandro Benedetti > Apache Lucene/Solr Committer > Director, R&D Software Engineer, Search Consultant > www.sease.io > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134] On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but > didn't have time to investigate it. > > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC1

+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:05:30.358141] On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 8:25 PM Timothy Potter wrote: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:07:15.796578] > > > Also built a *local* Docker image from the RC and tested various features > with the Solr operator on K8s, such as the updates to the Prom exporter & >

Re: Code reformatting

Hi Dawid, It is fine, if there are conflicts and will juggle them :) thanks for this effort, it is very cool! On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 5:04 PM Michael Sokolov wrote: > I see it there - yes, it makes some occasional widows, and sometimes > fails to join up consecutive single-line comments (I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.7.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:42:16.864208] On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [2:11:05.149743] > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:54 AM Atri Sharma wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.7.0 >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> https://

Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest, third time's a charm

A1, A2 (binding) On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 8:00 AM Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 9/1/2020 2:21 PM, Ryan Ernst wrote: > > In February a contest was started to design a new logo for Lucene > > [jira-issue]. The initial attempt [first-vote] to call a vote resulted > > in some confusion on the rules, as wel

Re: [VOTE] Lucene logo contest, here we go again

here is my vote: A1, A2 (binding) On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:49 PM Aurélien MAZOYER wrote: > Hi community, > > I would vote for A1. > > Aurélien > > > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 13:26, Andrzej Białecki wrote: > > > A1, D (binding) > > > > > On 1 Sep 2020, at 02:26, Ryan Ernst wrote: > > > > > > De

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Solr 8.6.2 released

01 September 2020, Apache Solr™ 8.6.2 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 8.6.2 Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful full-text search, hit highlighting, facet

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.6.2 released

01 September 2020, Apache Lucene™ 8.6.2 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.6.2. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 RC1

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 12 (10 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.2-RC1-rev016993b65e393b58246d54e8ddda9f56a453eb0e You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/script

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

a respin for this small UI thing. But if there is an RC2, > let’s include it. > > Jan > > 26. aug. 2020 kl. 11:13 skrev Ignacio Vera : > > Hi Jan, > > I spoke with Simon offline and we agreed I will be the release manager as > he was running in to issues. I have alr

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

ks Simon. >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 4:14 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >>> +1 thanks Simon >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:12 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: >&g

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

, 25 Aug, 2020, 11:21 am Simon Willnauer, > > wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 thank you! I was about to write the same email. Lets sync on the RM > > >> I can certainly help... I need to go and find my code signing key > > >> first :) > > >>

Lucene/Solr 8.6.2 bugfix release

Hi, I propose a 8.6.2 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The motivation for this release is LUCENE-9478 where Simon addressed a serious memory leak in DWPTDeleteQueue. If there are no objections I am planning to build the first RC by the end of this week. Ignacio

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:59:43.446356] On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:19 PM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I've pushed up the draft Solr Ref Guide for 8.6: > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_6/. > > This release will be the public debut of the redesign I finished a couple > months ago; if you have time, plea

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida to the PMC

Congratulations! On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:52 AM Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Welcome and Congrats, Uchida-san! > > Koji > > > On 2020/07/04 15:26, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I am pleased to announce that Tomoko Uchida has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > > > Welcome Tomoko! > > > > -- > > Ad

Re: Welcome Michael Sokolov to the PMC

Congratulations! On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 4:20 PM Steve Rowe wrote: > Congrats and welcome, Michael! > > -- > Steve > > > On Jul 3, 2020, at 7:57 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: > > > > I am pleased to announce that Michael Sokolov has accepted the PMC's > invitation to join. > > > > Welcome Michael! > >

Re: 8.6 release

+1 thanks! On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:43 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > +1, thanks Bruno! > > I would like to volunteer to be the RM for the next release. I will > shadow Bruno for this one and learn to prepare for the next release if > that is fine. > > Atri > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 7:05 PM Adrien G

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova as Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations Mayya! On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:04 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > Congratulations and welcome, Mayya! > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:58 AM jim ferenczi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Please join me in welcoming Mayya Sharipova as the latest Lucene/Solr >> committer. >> Mayya, it's tradition

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:28:18.127654] On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:30 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:27:85.49203] > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 3:03 PM Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [1:30:49.112899] > > > > Regards, > > Tommaso > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 14:47, Michae

Re: [VOTE] Solr to become a top-level Apache project (TLP)

+1 (binding) On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:38 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > -1 (binding) > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >