I was going to file a Jira on an issue with Solr 3.6, but I noticed that Jira
still thinks that 3.6 is “Unreleased”.
-- Jack Krupansky
tokenized and lets you query by individual
words embedded in the field values, and a second field which is a string or
keyword and is not tokenized but use wildcards on the full field value, with a
copyField to populate one field from the stored value of the other.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Ryan
vy:retrieve] .. (0kB)
[ivy:retrieve] [SUCCESSFUL ]
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting#randomizedtesting-runner;1.5.0!randomizedtesting-runner.jar
(981ms)
resolve:
[echo] Building analyzers-common...
------
-- Jack Krupansky
side effect of
virtualization.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:45 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: New Jenkins for Windows and Linux
Hi,
I set up a new Jenkins server that runs Linux and Windows builds (both 64
bit, running Ja
Erik,
This fails locally the same way for me as well. I see:
"java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: solr.clustering.ClusteringComponent"
Some jar issue?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:34
Maybe:
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Smiley, David W.
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:48 AM
To: mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: CHECKSUM FAILED for commons-fileupload-1.2.1.jar
I'm trying to build Lucene/Solr today, svn updated, then went to do a compile
and I got this:
CHECKSUM F
Minor typo in the javadoc for IndexReader.java and CompositeReader.java:
DirectoryReader,open()
(note the comma)
s.b.
DirectoryReader.open()
(Although some may prefer “#” rather than “.”)
-- Jack Krupansky
these four issues?
-- Jack Krupansky
That commit was for the "4x" branch as well as "trunk", right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 4:32 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: reindex trunk indexes
I just committed LUCENE-4090, you should reind
Thanks. That’s all good info to be documented for users to be aware of when
they start pushing the limits.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Walter Underwood
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 1:30 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Documenting document limits for Lucene and Solr
Deleted documents
A typo at line 146 in UIMAUpdateRequestProcessor.java:
log.info(new StringBuffer("Analazying text").toString());
“Analazying” s.b. “Analyzing”
-- Jack Krupansky
builds and
only on a successful build are revisions listed in the HTML. Is this
actually normal or is this a step that should be skipped if there are no
changes? Just curious.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: build...@apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2
There is no javadoc for IndexWriter.hasDeletions. I would have expected it to
be the same as for IndexReader:
/** Returns true if any documents have been deleted */
Although, I think both should also say “since the most recent merge”.
-- Jack Krupansky
zero, the
number of documents is actually limited to 2^30-1, so the highest document
number is limited to 2^30-1 minus another 1 or 2^30-2.
-- Jack Krupansky
documents.”
The javadoc should probably simply say: numDocs = maxDocs - numDeletedDocs
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 3:47 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the maximum document number?
Hi,
In fact maxDoc is not the maximum, it is also a
Oops, I indicated that Integer.MAX_INT was 2^30-1, but it is 2^31-1 or
2,147,483,647. So the largest document number in Lucene would be 2,147,483,646
and the largest number (count) of documents would be 2,147,483,647.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 4:09 PM
Double oops... it is Integer.MAX_VALUE, not Integer.MAX_INT.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 5:11 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What is the maximum document number?
Oops, I indicated that Integer.MAX_INT was 2^30-1, but it is 2^31-1 or
A couple of typos in the javadoc for Solr QueryResponseWriter.write:
1. “this method must be thread save” – “save” s.b. “safe”.
2. “req” – “req” s.b. “request”.
3. “rsp” – “rsp” s.b. “response”.
-- Jack Krupansky
Don't forget to remind people to do "ant clean-jars resolve" when they see
the "[licenses] MISSING sha1 checksum file" messages.
Why can't that step be done automatically?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dawid Weiss (JIRA)
Sent: Tuesday,
” stigma?
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/queries/org/apache/lucene/queries/function/FunctionQuery.html
-- Jack Krupansky
avoid confusion in
CHANGES.txt?
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
-- Jack Krupansky
Great question. It is indeed one possible future, as is LUCENE-3837. All the
more reason to close SOLR-139.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Otis Gospodnetic
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 8:09 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status of SOLR-139 - Support updateable/modifiable documents
The fuzzy option will be ignored here – you cannot combine fuzzy and wild on
the same term, although you could do an OR of the two:
(hello* OR hello~)
-- Jack Krupansky
From: sri krishna
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:08 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: composition of different
As the official guide book states, "Please be patient. Committers are busy
people too. If no one responds to your patch after a few days, please make
friendly reminders."
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute#Contributing_your_work
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origin
t... not everyone is persuaded!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:43 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: dismax vs edismax
It was my hope that by now, the dismax & edismax distinction would be a
thing
of the pas
who are the "owners" (and that should/must be plural!)
or most-interested parties in a particular area.
If at any point it looks like there is a single "owner" in an area, that is
a sign of potential trouble. Keep the "bus factor" in mind.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
No, the wildcard or fuzzy query is part of the term and the boost is a separate
modifier:
(hello*^0.5 OR hello~^0.5)
Or...
(hello* OR hello~)^0.5
-- Jack Krupansky
From: sri krishna
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 12:21 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: composition of
and feature improvements accrue.
-- Jack Krupansky
not sure if this is a bug per se, or just an unintended usage of defType
and localParams query parsers, but either way it SHOULD work.
-- Jack Krupansky
Sami, I'm so sorry to hear that you have been promoted into "management".
Hopefully you will still occasionally find time for some "real" technical
work. Good luck in any case!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Wednesday, December
is mainly of interest
to the developers of higher-level search platforms such as Solr and
ElasticSearch as opposed to the users of those platforms?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 7:03 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Thanks. Now back to thinking about Lucene vs. Solr facets in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Shai Erera
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:45 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr faceting vs. Lucene faceting
Hi Jack,
> Are Lucene facets "static" in some/any sense?
incompatibly rename TrieDate to TrieDateTime and use TrieDate for the new
format), could be stored with, say, 40% more storage efficiency and maybe a
comparable or at least significant performance improvement for queries.
Thoughts?
-- Jack Krupansky
a-binary '
sku:td-01'
It would be nice if Solr would default to application/xml, but a friendly error
return would be better than a no-op in this case.
FWIW, curl –v shows this header being sent if I don’t specify it explicitly:
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
-- Jack Krupansky
ugh your comment seemed to imply that the new 4.1 postings format would
store day-style dates more efficiently - could you summarize what effects we
could see?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:05 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.or
cher.java?r1=1294212&r2=1294211&pathrev=1294212
Mon Feb 27 16:48:19 2012 UTC (9 months, 4 weeks ago)
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2012 11:38 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Cache stats and the log files
I'm not seeing cache statistics
ranteed to work.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: karl.wri...@nokia.com
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 3:32 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Is there documentation anywhere describing interoperability of
SolrJ?
Hi all,
For the ManifoldCF project, we have an output connecto
SOLR-788:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/MoreLikeThisComponent.java?r1=1421333&r2=1421332&pathrev=1421333
-- Jack Krupansky
he options be “list” (or “true”),
“details”, or “none” (or “false”).
-- Jack Krupansky
Solr, so
there should be no significant penalty.
-- Jack Krupansky
Sorry, but you need to ask this on the Lucene user list.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: algebra
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 6:49 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: get a Word in FuzzyQuery
Hello guys. I'm working with FuzzyQuery and I a have a doubt: I would
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4250
Register MoreLikeThis request handler in example solrconfig.xml
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2012 1:21 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improvement: Add commented-out
Seriously, why bother. I mean, just make an assumption about average sentence
length, say 15, multiple by 3, and search for matches within that many words,
say 50. Is there a great reason why that is not good enough?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Mike Ree
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 1:50 PM
To
You have 3 errors in that name, so it won't work for a spellchecker that has
a limit of 2 errors. So, try some of the other spellchecker algorithms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: algebra
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 8:52 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Su
“maxEdits”.
-- Jack Krupansky
en to a re-spin to
put quality over a mere day or two of delay. But draw a hard line on
Wednesday.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:36 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.1 release
Saying tomorrow without any date that gi
We look forward to your success!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Steve Rowe
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:53 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.1 release
On #lucene IRC, Robert Muir wrote "i'm not RM this time"
I volunteer to be the 4.1 RM.
S
ialized, except for that code path where
there was zero or one QueryConverter class.
-- Jack Krupansky
I just tried, and it causes an NPE, kind of as I had expected. I’ll file the
Jira.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Dyer, James
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:50 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Possible bug in Solr SpellCheckComponent if more than one
QueryConverter class is present
I saw the branch_4x commit go by for this, but I believe it was AFTER the
4.1 branch was made.
So, is it okay that 4.1 does not have this fix?
But this is just a test change, anyway.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:52 AM
To
Javadoc, if for no other
reason than that Eclipse is a friendly environment for developing and
testing plugins.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:42 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable javadoc check
Start by adding &debugQuery=true to your query request and look at the
timings for the various search components.
You know, there has been some recent chatter about slowness of references to
"localhost" vs. "127.0.0.1". Who knows, maybe that could be a factor h
as well.
Also, the getLimitedValue method is missing method Javadoc.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
%).
Latest trunk checkout was not having this issue for me in my numerous test runs
over the past few days. This is my first 4x test in the last two days.
-- Jack Krupansky
I posted comments for this specific case on LUCENE-4397. It did in fact
finish.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dawid Weiss
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:26 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testRollbackAndCommitWithThreads
looping
ield types
"spatial_alpha", "spatial_beta", etc. and users can use folklore and trial
and error to decide which types to use, and the full, detailed names need
only appear in the field type class attributes.
Is there an updated wiki I can look at to understand this stuff a littl
is fine. No mention of Java version requirement in the
Lucene CHANGES.txt.
I may just manually install 7u7 and not use it to avoid the update notice until
Lucene/Solr “upgrades” to Java 7, but I suspect a fair number of people will
simply take the update and say goodbye to Java 6.
-- Jack
with 4.0,
why should they have to read the release notes for 3.6??
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:52 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
development and use?
We already stated that in
of Lucene/Solr?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:45 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is it safe to upgrade to Oracle Java 7u7 for Lucene/Solr
development and use?
BUILD.txt:
Lucene Build Instructions
Basic steps
Sorry, but you should be pursuing this on the solr-user list, not the dev
list.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Biff Baxter
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 5:25 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: need best solution for indexing and searching multiple, related
Somebody is going to need to make a call on whether support for Solr Admin
UI in IE 9 is required for 4.0 release. See SOLR-3876.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3876
I marked it only as critical, for now.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent
x27;get POM templates', end=' ')
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
(The caret was under the “=” after “end”.)
-- Jack Krupansky
ache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0RC0-rev1389174/";
4.0.0 smoke-temp
Load release URL
"http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.0RC0-rev1389174/";...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mikemcc...@apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, Sep
manually define ant properties for these as well?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 11:51 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1390535 - in /lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x: ./
dev-tools/ dev-tools/scripts
ere is anything special cleanup I
need to do such as I had to do when running the py file directly.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 1:03 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1390535 - in /lucene/dev/br
The smoke tester even finally conceded "SUCCESS!" for me on Windows 7 with
Cygwin. (Only ran for two and a half hours!)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Steven A Rowe
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 4:41 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: VOTE: release
I always run ??ant clean clean-jars resolve eclipse?? after checkout, delete
the eclipse-build directory, then do ??refresh?? in eclipse.
-- Jack Krupansky
From:
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:52 AM
To: dev
Subject: ??build solr source
Hi all,
when I check the solr source
Thank you!
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 11:30 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: 回复：build solr source
Since 2 hrs there is now also „ant clean-eclipse“, so after checkout only “ant
clean-eclipse eclipse” would do a clean setup. No resolve
It’s all one project. In Eclipse do “Refresh”.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: 心如止水
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:02 PM
To: dev
Subject: 回复： 回复：build solr source
Hi both,
Thank you very much .
But in which directory to run the ant clean-eclipse eclipse command ?
I check out use this command
broken.
The wiki deserves a little more review for 4.0 release by somebody who knows
what's what for update processors.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
-- Jack Krupansky
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Oops, that link is probably not broken - connectivity to the wiki is flaky.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 5:53 PM
To: Lucene/Solr Dev
Subject: Solr 4.0 wiki update for Update Processors
I noticed this statement on the
Success for smoke tester on my Windows 7 Cygwin machine. with Java 1.6.0_29.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:10 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2
4.0.
-- Jack Krupansky
From:
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:02 AM
To: dev
Subject: where is org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrServlet class
Hi All,
Anyone can tell me where is the class org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrServlet ?
I have checked out the lucene source code from the path
http
Ah, and at long last, there we have it, "official" and "final" source for
Release 4.0 of Lucene/Solr!
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_0_0/
Thank you, Robert!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rm...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, O
As long as the unified change list is easy to get to (for people who are
primarily concerned with how 4.0 is different from 3.x), the abbreviated
news is probably fine.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:07 PM
To: dev
lease when you
last viewed unless you refresh), you also need to clear your browser cache
to see the new release rather than whatever release you previously
downloaded. (I'm running Google Chrome.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Friday, October
The Solr example schema says “
uot; (_version_ does not exist)
This is in 4.0.0.
-- Jack Krupansky
Can we put a notice on the github page that essentially says “ownership of any
code committed to this repo is implicitly transferred to ASF”?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:01 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Source Control
This has come up in
types. They are not on the schema wiki or in the
example schema either.
-- Jack Krupansky
wretches who trek up here from
downtown to crouch around every available public power receptacle to charge
their phones and computers - a cross between Matrix and Revolution.)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 3:10 PM
To: dev@lucene.apac
Check the tagged version:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/tags/lucene_solr_4_0_0/
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1396952
It is 1396952, but that says: "Copied from
lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_0, r1394844"
So, yes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Or
t know enough
about github to know whether you can have one class of user able to create
branches or comment on them but not merge into master or tagged branches
such as releases.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 7:02 PM
To: dev@lucene
ailable to
get things fixed. File detailed Jira's as well, as above, except NOT as
blockers. I mean, let's get the chronic failures under control on the "main"
supported platforms before expanding the supported environments - "supported
but with significant and chronic
as possible.
Ultimately, if there was a single fuzzy query implementation that did
everything for everybody all of the time, that would be the way to go, but if
choices need to be made to satisfy competing goals, we should support going
that route.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Mark Bennett
Sent
“we did not remove functionality”
Are you saying that full-featured “classic” fuzzy query is still available in
the Lucene query parser? By default? Or via what option?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:30 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE
discrimination that the old approach, such as
for very short terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:51 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: FuzzyQuery vs SlowFuzsyQuery docs? -- was: Re: [jira] [Commented]
(LUCENE-2667) Fix FuzzyQuery's defaults, so its
+1, exactly.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:32 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery vs SlowFuzsyQuery docs? -- was: Re: [jira]
[Commented] (LUCENE-2667) Fix FuzzyQuery's defaults, so its fast.
On Sun, N
+1
Now, is your proposal ONLY for the Solr query parser, or for the Lucene
query parser as well? Or... for FuzzyQuery itself?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:43 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: FuzzyQuery vs
a reindex? I don’t
recall seeing any discussion here about it.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:00 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Heads-up] Index file format change on trunk
Hi,
I just committed LUCENE-4509 [1] which changes the default
Thank you for that clarification!
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Adrien Grand
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:10 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Heads-up] Index file format change on trunk
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
Hmmm... does this mean that
ions about
Lucene.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Emiliana Suci
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 4:33 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: tokenizer in porterStemmer
PorterStemmer using tokenizer which class in lucene??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
“Apache
Lucene – Developer” and “Apache Solr – Version Control”.
And maybe the two pages should be merged somehow or at least made consistent
since both Lucene and Solr have the same needs in that area (Developer/Source.)
-- Jack Krupansky
d
also be part of the default text field type. Right now, it is hidden off in
text_en_splitting.
I'll file the Jira tomorrow. Feel free to hold off comments until the Jira
appears.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
(Feel free to add these comments to the Jira I filed this morning:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3723)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:22 AM
To: Lucene Dev
Subject: Re: Improve OOTB behavior: English word
I had in fact heard the distant echoes of your “sort of silently set to false”
plea, so it wasn’t in vain.
No matter what, we’ll make sure there is some updated documentation.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Tom Burton-West
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:12 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject
Robert,
I just happened to notice that you still have "lucidimagination.com" in your
mail message signature, even though the company is now named LucidWorks at
lucidworks.com. Didn't you get the memo?
http://info.lucidworks.com/blog/bid/204108/What-s-in-a-Name
--
ave false matches. And if the list of synonyms have
varying lengths, the position of the next term will be off for phrase queries.
In any case, I am proposing moving forward with a full solution at query time
only, for now.
-- Jack Krupansky
t is still down.) I mean,
a multi-word synonym is multiple tokens. How does any of the "tokens" span
more than one position?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 1:44 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Fu
index) cannot yet represent an arbitrary
* graph.
Granted, some of that is specific to index-time support for synonyms, which
I am avoiding, but it is a source for some confusion. If full graphs are
somehow supported at query time (or in the TokenStream in general), that
should be stated mor
1 - 100 of 591 matches
Mail list logo
