->
>> >> org.apache.lucene.analysis.phonetic
>> >> lucene-analysis-smartcn-10.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar ->
>> >> org.apache.lucene.analysis.smartcn
>> >> lucene-analysis-stempel-10.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar->
>> >> org.apache.lucene.an
larized). In later Lucene
> 9.x versions we will add full module support and only expose APIs for
> external consumption and hide all internal lucene packages.
> >>
> >> The 9.0 relese should make sure that the module names are at least
> "defined", so we can use them la
Lucene 9.x
>> versions we will add full module support and only expose APIs for external
>> consumption and hide all internal lucene packages.
>>
>> The 9.0 relese should make sure that the module names are at least
>> "defined", so we can use
de all internal lucene packages.
>
> The 9.0 relese should make sure that the module names are at least
> "defined", so we can use them later in module-info.java,
>
> Should I send a vote thread about this to the mailing list separately?
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schi
dler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 7:36 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>
> Here is the change add
> > In every build.gradle file define the module name explicit using an ext
> property for the "Automatic Module Name" JAR manifest, don't use regex
> replace on the filesystem path of the gradle build.
>
> I disagree with you - convention over configuration. If you derive the
> module name from
Here is the change adding the 'org.apache.*' prefix, Uwe:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/487
I verified that Luke starts in the rebuilt distribution and that
module names show org.apache.* prefixes. Dashes are not allowed in
modules so Lucene artifacts using them (spatial-extras,
Dear Uwe,
> I did not notice this because it was somehow hidden.
It was not hidden, Uwe. It was right there in the issue that
introduced it, along with a comment that it was a deliberate decision
(mine).
> In every build.gradle file define the module name explicit using an ext
> property for
hterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Grand
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 3:31 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>
> Please vote for release can
nauthorized artifacts created
>> accidentally). If somebody wants to release a custom Lucene with patches,
>> one can pass -Dversion.suffix="Ubuntu20.04-foobar" to make a customized
>> release.
>> >>
>> >> Uwe
>> >>
>> >> -
; >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Dawid Weiss
> >> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM
> >> > To:
tomized
>> release.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Dawid Weiss
>> > S
w.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dawid Weiss
> > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
> >
> > I don't think it's a showstopper. This a
thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 1:33 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>
> I don't think it's a showstopper. This applies to any 9x branch -
> perhaps starting fro
I don't think it's a showstopper. This applies to any 9x branch -
perhaps starting from main. We can extract these instructions into a
separate document. On the other hand, it wouldn't be shown up there on
github front-page then... and times have changed - this is where most
folks would probably
Seems to me the details for how to turn a src tarball into something that
can be compiled should go in a BUILDING.txt file?
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:00 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:17:23.949074]
>
> +1.
>
> D.
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:31 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> >
> > Please vote
SUCCESS! [0:17:23.949074]
+1.
D.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:31 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
+1 SUCCESS! [0:22:43.58483]
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:30 PM Robert Muir wrote:
>
> +1
>
> (with --test-java17)
> SUCCESS! [0:26:01.193203]
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:40 AM Michael McCandless
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:06:46.020662]
> >
> > What a crazy speedup to smoke tester!!
> Also fine with some note that, if you want to fork lucene and make your
> own source release, you can use our packaging build infrastructure, but you
> need to git clone. We are giving you a source release, not a git clone
> (shallow or deep). If you want to fork and make your own customized
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> FYI,
>
> looks like this:
>
>
>
> I also tried to compile, test and assemble. All works. Only the src.tgz
> can’t be built from itsself, because the extracted folder is no git
> repository :
>
>
>
> > Task :checkWorkingCopyClean
>
>
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Uwe Schindler
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2021 10:51 PM
To: Robert Muir
Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
The pax file is only in the root of the ta
The pax file is only in the root of the tar file next to the folder named
"lucene-9.0.0/".
This is why I have seen it. You open the tar file and it shows up next to the
root folder, so it was impossible to ignore. Same after extraction.
Am 28. November 2021 20:58:52 UTC schrieb Robert Muir :
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 11:12 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> Thanks Robert!
>
> This is of course not a problem, but 7zip is the defacto unzipper used on
> windows nowadays, so we should be prepared because of questions.
>
> It's not an issue at all, the hidden file contains useful information
Thanks Robert!
This is of course not a problem, but 7zip is the defacto unzipper used on
windows nowadays, so we should be prepared because of questions.
It's not an issue at all, the hidden file contains useful information (commit
hash), so I don't care. I was more wondering why it was
https://sourceforge.net/p/sevenzip/bugs/2116/
Basically, it seems to me this 7zip doesn't support the posix pax
extensions used by lots of software (read the comments on the bug
report for an idea). So it treats them as ordinary tar files and
that's why Uwe sees these files.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 5:15 AM Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wasn't the src.tgz not created by Gradle? Was it done by using the git
>> command line inside the release wizard?
>
>
> No - we use external git because it simplifies excludes/ includes (git will
> only compress versioned files).
>
>
>
> Wasn't the src.tgz not created by Gradle? Was it done by using the git
> command line inside the release wizard?
>
No - we use external git because it simplifies excludes/ includes (git will
only compress versioned files).
I found that out, too.
Wasn't the src.tgz not created by Gradle? Was it done by using the git command
line inside the release wizard?
I used 7zip on Windows to review file contents.
Uwe
Am 28. November 2021 08:29:55 UTC schrieb Dawid Weiss :
>>
>> I checked the src.tgz file, I was only a bit
>
> I checked the src.tgz file, I was only a bit confused about the
> "pax_global_header" file, looks as if it contains the commit hash. What's
> this?
>
Seems like a file created by git export -
Kernel tar-archives created by git contain an extended header with the git
commit ID that was used
ginal Message-----
> > From: Adrien Grand
> > Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 3:31 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can
D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Grand
> Sent: Friday, November 26, 2021 3:31 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC3
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>
>
+1
SUCCESS! [0:08:46.711289]
(Java 11 JAVA_HOME=/home/gus/../zulu11.48.21-ca-jdk11.0.11-linux_x64/)
Smoketester only
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 10:57 AM Tomoko Uchida
wrote:
> Luke app starts on both of Linux and Windows (with or without spaces
> in the path) and works well for me.
> Thanks
Luke app starts on both of Linux and Windows (with or without spaces
in the path) and works well for me.
Thanks everyone who took the time for it.
Tomoko
2021年11月27日(土) 23:57 Robert Muir :
>
> +1
>
> (with --test-java17)
> SUCCESS! [0:26:01.193203]
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:40 AM Michael
+1
(with --test-java17)
SUCCESS! [0:26:01.193203]
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:40 AM Michael McCandless
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:06:46.020662]
>
> What a crazy speedup to smoke tester!!
>
>
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 3:42 AM Ignacio
+1
SUCCESS! [0:06:46.020662]
What a crazy speedup to smoke tester!!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 3:42 AM Ignacio Vera wrote:
> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:17:28.435474]
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
>> +1 SUCCESS!
+1
SUCCESS! [0:17:28.435474]
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 1:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1 SUCCESS! [0:23:41.775448]
>
> Only ran smoketester this time.
>
> Jan
>
> > 26. nov. 2021 kl. 15:31 skrev Adrien Grand :
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can
+1 SUCCESS! [0:23:41.775448]
Only ran smoketester this time.
Jan
> 26. nov. 2021 kl. 15:31 skrev Adrien Grand :
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
+1 (binding).
SUCCESS! [0:14:24.593226]
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Michael Sokolov wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:10:10.031522]
>
> +1 from me
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 9:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
> >
> > Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
> >
> > The artifacts can be
SUCCESS! [0:10:10.031522]
+1 from me
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 9:31 AM Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene 9.0.0.
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC3-rev-1ddce848cf3d5067efcafc6569d5f8203e56af0b
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u
40 matches
Mail list logo
