[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14197896#comment-14197896
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
If this looks acceptable, my plan is to commit to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14198367#comment-14198367
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
Unfortunately this issue never got consensus as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14198371#comment-14198371
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-4586:
[~rcmuir] now has a conflict-of-interest that he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196180#comment-14196180
]
Robert Parker commented on SOLR-4586:
-
I've opened a bug in response to this behavior:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196210#comment-14196210
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
IMO, maxBooleanClauses should just go away for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196212#comment-14196212
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-4586:
I'd like to point out that if you are submitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196260#comment-14196260
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
[~yo...@apache.org], I think you just stumbled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196266#comment-14196266
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
[~reparker], yeah, this is the known behavior
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14196963#comment-14196963
]
Ramkumar Aiyengar commented on SOLR-4586:
-
Since it's been mentioned somewhere
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14197467#comment-14197467
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. yeah, this is the known behavior - the first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14197627#comment-14197627
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
[~jkrupan], you were right and I was wrong. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14197692#comment-14197692
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
Currently this limit is set in the SolrConfig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14195112#comment-14195112
]
Robert Parker commented on SOLR-4586:
-
Under Solr 4.10.2 in solrcloud configuration, if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14195223#comment-14195223
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
[~reparker], maxBooleanClauses is a global Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14195233#comment-14195233
]
Robert Parker commented on SOLR-4586:
-
Ive only got one collection and one config in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14195253#comment-14195253
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
That's correct.
It is entirely possible that this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14103900#comment-14103900
]
Bragadeesh commented on SOLR-4586:
--
I bumped through this issue recently. Is this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14104249#comment-14104249
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-4586:
--
Bragadeesh:
You can set it in Solr via a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13714848#comment-13714848
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
Huh... I though we had settled this for 4.4.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629036#comment-13629036
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
In situations where true consensus cannot be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629048#comment-13629048
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
FYI, I'm currently working on testing that setting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629052#comment-13629052
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
{bq}
is there a way in Lucene to specify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629068#comment-13629068
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
My specific query example might have been bad, as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629080#comment-13629080
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Sure, just break it up into 1024-term chunks:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629096#comment-13629096
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Sure, just break it up into 1024-term chunks:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629098#comment-13629098
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
And, technically, the query parser's query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629301#comment-13629301
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
I was thinking that maybe there should be a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629302#comment-13629302
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
I'm still -1 to removing the limit. Its even more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629336#comment-13629336
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Its even more bogus to just silently ignore a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629399#comment-13629399
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Here's a simple patch that removes the max
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13629427#comment-13629427
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. I would also remove maxBooleanClauses from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623631#comment-13623631
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
Even before someone was crazy enough to make me a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623654#comment-13623654
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. For Lucene, choosing TermsFilter is probably a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623682#comment-13623682
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4586:
---
bq. Even the default I've proposed is probably too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623691#comment-13623691
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
My revised proposal:
1. Unless the Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623852#comment-13623852
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Leave it in Solr as well, on the theory that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13622910#comment-13622910
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
I have been working on a new patch. Here's my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13622924#comment-13622924
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
I already stated i dont think it should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13622994#comment-13622994
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. (I fundamentally disagree with the entire idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13623383#comment-13623383
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-4586:
Rob, how would you feel if the BooleanQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615068#comment-13615068
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
{quote}
1) Remove the solr.xml additions.
{quote}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615267#comment-13615267
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
-1 to put maxBooleanClauses in solr.xml, it does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13615312#comment-13615312
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4586:
---
bq. if the static max clauses had never existed,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614407#comment-13614407
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
Here's my proposal:
The current 4x patch goes in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611735#comment-13611735
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
My recommendation at solr.xml was to fix the bugs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611742#comment-13611742
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. when it really should be in solr.xml, since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611744#comment-13611744
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
I disagree with Integer.MAX_VALUE (as i said on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611757#comment-13611757
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. I disagree with Integer.MAX_VALUE (as i said
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611760#comment-13611760
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
Like i said: I disagree. if someone has more than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611764#comment-13611764
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4586:
We've seen tons of instances of people wanting to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611842#comment-13611842
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
I would note that neither SpanOrQuery or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611972#comment-13611972
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-4586:
FWIW My opinion is consistent with Yonik Jack's.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611368#comment-13611368
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
Side note: I notice that the default value for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611383#comment-13611383
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4586:
---
Yeah, it probably would be a good change except it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611411#comment-13611411
]
Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-4586:
--
This issue has morphed more than a bit since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13611537#comment-13611537
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
Yes, it has morphed quite a lot. I had some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13605943#comment-13605943
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-4586:
---
Instead of the hair involving reloading and stuff,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13606058#comment-13606058
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4586:
bq. Instead of the hair involving reloading and
58 matches
Mail list logo
