On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 15:00 +0100, Karell Ste-Marie wrote:
> I think that in the end, there should be at least 3 projects for Lucene:
> 1. The Lucene algorithms, in a platform-neutral language - let the search
> engine gurus implement how this should be done without having to worry about
> impera
Karell,
What would be the problem with Lucene.Net in Azure?
-Original Message-
From: Karell Ste-Marie [mailto:stema...@brain-bank.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 6:01 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
I&#
I don't really understand why so many people seem to have a problem with the
interface of Lucene.NET. From my experience it's straightforward and easy to
use. Sure, it doesn't support LINQ and doesn't have properties but to me
this is just syntactic sugar. And I like the fact that I can use sample
]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:58 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
I don't think Lucene.Net staying a line-by-line port is craziness. We're not
saying that Lucene.Net is the one true implementation and there can be no
others. I see
:pierogi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:58 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
I don't think Lucene.Net staying a line-by-line port is craziness. We're not
saying that Lucene.Net is the one true implementation and there can be
On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Granroth, Neal V. wrote:
> Is Java Lucene "grown up" ? Look at how much discussion it took to determine
> how to get Java out of the name :)
Neal, that discussion is exactly how a well-functioning project should work at
the ASF. Things are discussed and then a de
ept
> level would find it more beneficial to join that brain-pool instead of
> diluting the effort by starting up elsewhere.
>
>
> - Neal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:55 PM
> To: lucene-n
: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:55 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project announcement
This topic has been coming back again and again which I have tried to
address multiple times, so let me try
ly, and thus we can't influence them.
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] [mailto:casper...@caspershouse.com]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:36 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene project annou
you should" is a
demand.
Unfortunately, that's not what is happening in and out of the list
and it's behavior that I hope is curbed immediately.
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hadfield [mailto:paul.hadfi...@palmerharvey.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, Novem
lication
support: idealinksupp...@brainbankinc.com
http://idealinksupport.brainbankinc.com/OnTimePortal/
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 7:08 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene project announcement
I a
11 matches
Mail list logo
